I think that perhaps this movie would have worked better with an American or English setting.
You may be right that the movie's setting was a turn off for some audiences. It would have been a sore point around this time due to the recent wars. I get that but the setting of the movie plays a crucial role in the story. I suppose England could have been a suitable alternative but definitely not the US.
The movie was good, though a bit old-fashioned for 1932. The talkies seemed to abandon the European settings that were in vogue during the silent era.
If that's the case, I don't know why the movie makers wouldn't have known that and made whatever changes were necessary.
I could not get past how much the butler Albert sounded like Count Dracula.
Lukas was so good in the role of Albert, I wonder if his casting didn't have something to do with keeping or changing the setting of the movie. If I recall, Albert's family was supposed to have been in the employ of the family for generations. His accent wouldn't have worked if the movie was set somewhere else.
Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]
reply
share