MovieChat Forums > Downstairs (1932) Discussion > Surprised noone has started a thread on ...

Surprised noone has started a thread on here


I believe this movie is good enough for discussion. It's actually better than good. It's one of those overlooked gems, I feel. John Gilbert commands the screen in this movie. How does anyone else feel about this movie?

reply

I agree this is a really good film and John Gilbert proved that he was a very good actor as well as very intelligent in coming up with the idea for this film, I'm now a fan of both the movie and Mr. Gilbert, too bad he died so young.

I'm Whackjob, I'm insane, and I approve this message
-WhackJob March 18, 2008

reply

I've read a lot about John Gilbert over the years, but had never seen one of his movies until I saw "Downstairs" on TCM today. It was wonderful. I was really impressed by Mr Gilbert's performance.

reply

The movie was good, though a bit old-fashioned for 1932. The talkies seemed to abandon the European settings that were in vogue during the silent era. I think that perhaps this movie would have worked better with an American or English setting. I could not get past how much the butler Albert sounded like Count Dracula. Of course that was not a consideration for the viewers at the time.

reply

Er, Paul Lukas (Albert, the butler) and Bela Lugosi were both Hungarian. Guess that's one reason their voices were similar...
May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?

reply

I think that perhaps this movie would have worked better with an American or English setting.
You may be right that the movie's setting was a turn off for some audiences. It would have been a sore point around this time due to the recent wars. I get that but the setting of the movie plays a crucial role in the story. I suppose England could have been a suitable alternative but definitely not the US.

The movie was good, though a bit old-fashioned for 1932. The talkies seemed to abandon the European settings that were in vogue during the silent era.
If that's the case, I don't know why the movie makers wouldn't have known that and made whatever changes were necessary.

I could not get past how much the butler Albert sounded like Count Dracula.
Lukas was so good in the role of Albert, I wonder if his casting didn't have something to do with keeping or changing the setting of the movie. If I recall, Albert's family was supposed to have been in the employ of the family for generations. His accent wouldn't have worked if the movie was set somewhere else.


Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan. [Tarzan and his mate]

reply