MovieChat Forums > After Tomorrow (1932) Discussion > Frank sexual dialogue before the Code er...

Frank sexual dialogue before the Code era


Sidney: Well, I thought - listen Pete, why can't we have a holiday together? Well, why can't we go away somewhere together? We could come back...and nobody would have to know. Well wouldn'tcha?

Pete: You poor little kid, somebody's been telling you a lot about the differences between women and men...self-control. Maybe it's true, and maybe again it's just a lot of applesauce. Anyway, as far as I'm concerned, and this is on the level, it's got nothing to do with sex. It's just on the level, that's all. Get me?

reply

All of the film's explorations of sexuality are spot-on, and the most honest representations I've seen in a film from this era. It's a shame this movie is not more well known. It's such a rare, perfect treat.

reply

It's a great, though very little know movie, and it was kind of surprising how many times they openly said "sex" in the dialogue, like half-a-dozen! But always with good taste, and the context totally justified the use of the word.

Animal crackers in my soup
Monkeys and rabbits loop the loop

reply

In this post-sexual revolution age, it's hardly ever acknowledged that courting couples under the old sexual codes were strongly conflicted and stressed about sexual intimacy - especially women. Most courting couples had to abide by the ruthlessly strict moral codes of their day. With access to contraception being heavily restricted and pregnancy out of marriage being the ultimate life destroyer, they had little choice. It's hinted, but not outright acknowledged, that Sid's parents had a shotgun wedding. The outcome seemed to have been OK for the father, but it had left the mother clearly frustrated and unfulfilled.

The problems with money and with Sid and Pete having to endlessly postpone their wedding became a flashpoint of sexual frustration, especially for Sidney - not so much Pete, strangely enough. The scene of their physical and flirtatious wrestling was quite poignant, underlying their sexual frustration (reminiscent of the pillow fight in My Brilliant Career). The intervention of the judgemental mother reduced something playful and beautiful to a grubby little incident.

The presence of the flirty 'bad' girl trying to seduce Pete was annoying, but served to show that he was a decent and loyal man. I doubt if most men of the era were so honourable.

This is a beautiful little gem of a film, that highlights the problems of young people struggling not only with financial problems and family loyalty, but also the unnatural sexual morality imposed on them.

reply