With certainly no offense meant to Jean Harlow, who's a beautiful woman, but Loretta Young is simply radiant in this film! Each scene she's in just resonates with her stunning beauty! I was completely taken with her the first time she came on screen. :)
I comletely agree! I have to say I think she is much more alluring than JH in this film. I was surprised at just how un-sexy JH was in this, given that she was renowned for being THE orgiginal blond bombshell, I was certainly expecting more of an 'it' factor. I didnt get any kind of sexy vibe from her performance and for me she was disappointing. LY on the other hand, an underestimated revelation & am now on the hunt for more of her films to watch :-)
An interesting thing about this film is its symmetrical miscasting: Loretta Young would've been perfect in Jean Harlow's role -- and vice versa.
Harlow (though undeniably a knock-out) has a kind of earthy appeal that would've made Stew Smith's comment that he always thought of Gallagher as "one of the boys" almost believable. But when he says it about the ethereally beautiful and utterly feminine Young, you have to think he's either blind or insane.
hipdadiddy An interesting thing about this film is its symmetrical miscasting: Loretta Young would've been perfect in Jean Harlow's role -- and vice versa.
Yes, perhaps you're right.
That Young got top billing here is questionable. Not that she was, even at her age of 18, not a star. The starring roll is Harlows character. Harlow at this point of her career, 21 years of age, was not comparable to Young. Harlow as of yet doesn't rule. A few years later that all changed.
Harlow was actually 20 (not 21) when this was made.
The film was initially called "Gallagher" after Young's character, but the studio (Columbia) wanted to capitalize on the platinum blond craze Harlow had swept the nation in after Hell's Angels. Also, Harry Cohn was loaned a great deal of money by mobster Longy Zwillman (whom Harlow was dating on and off at the time), so one of the conditions of the loan was that Harlow get a two film deal with top billing.
The other film she made for Columbia was the forgettable "Three Wise Girls."
by - hipdadiddy on Thu Feb 7 2008 12:00:09 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An interesting thing about this film is its symmetrical miscasting: Loretta Young would've been perfect in Jean Harlow's role -- and vice versa.
_______________________
I have to completely agree, hipdadiddy - in fact I JUST sent a post on another thread for this film in which I stated the exact same thing!
I agree, and thought that immediately when Harlow walked on camera. But switching the roles was fascinating. And JH curbed her accent for the role... She and the actress who played her mother were spitting images of one another, as well.
Just saw this one today. Boy films like this and the Busby dance routine ones (Fred & Ginger too) offered the Depression Era such needed escapism. Npw we have the Bond series and beloved as those are, I don't sense the same lift to the spirit needed now. Young and Harlow just roll thru this. Writing is of Broadway stage level for that time. Check those interiors with sky high ceiling and curtains. Capra's shots from the upper staircase are practically Busby like. The audience must have been awestruck by the mansion magnificence. As an aside, one wonders what this kind of film said to the rest of the world as to the US place in the globe back then. What a mix of rich vs working class even if they were reporters. So loved Young & Harlow. Esp Young. So fresh yet the womanly range was right there. I loved the bits about how, oh she's 'just' Gallagher, one of the boys. Even that name is so male, yet has the Gal in it. Really sets the tone for the wisecracking journalism films yet to come. But those didn't play up the same rich crowd theme. They were more on the small d democrat mold as the Big D went deeper. Less glamour & flash w/o the babe power charge. Be interesting to see how Hollywood, such as there is such a thing, treats what unfolds as this current econ mess goes thru. Will they mostly ignore it as with the Mideast wars or dig into it. Meanwhile it is great to see the comments here on PB and see that quality does survive time! Pass on any more such delightful films guys.
A long time since, but what a great post! The "GAL agher" went right over my head--TY TY TY!
I'd love to see what you posted about Hollywood's reaction to the economic crisis at the time you wrote your post... I can think of lots of independently sourced films that dealt with corruption...and did they not lavishly remake F. Scott Fitzgerald's The Great Gatsby? A bit late tho... We got quite a few vampire movies and a lot of sci fi about a dystopian future....Hunger Games, Divergent, Elysium, etc... All based on books?
I don't know, I think Jean Harlow looks her prettiest in this movie than in other films I have seen her in, however have not seen all that many. Loretta Young is very pretty here also and I might say the same for her. IMO they are pretty in different ways one a 'bombshell' the other less "noisy".
I could hardly believe it was Loretta Young, having seen her on TV when I was a child and she was older then. In this movie, she is naturally gorgeous and fresh, really stunning. I am so impressed!
While I'm a huge fan of both Young and Harlow, I never thought of the latter as a great beauty. Sure, she was cute, pretty and immensely charming, especially while playing tough girls with heart of gold in those great '30s comedies; but Loretta Young was certainly a vision of beauty. Her face was just exquisite and her beauty classy and angelic.
Unlike many previous posters, I don't think they were miscast, as in the end is the gorgeous and sensible Loretta who -with all justice- gets the guy.
Animal crackers in my soup Monkeys and rabbits loop the loop