Heloise and Abelard
One reviewer saw the not saying outright what happened to Abelard as showing the limit of precode liberality. In my view it would have been a very coarse WWI era man indeed to go into the details with a woman. She and we understood his meaning. There were limits to what gentlemen said to ladies so having him go into the whole gruesome story would have shown him to be no gentleman and that he was treating her as if she were no lady.
My question is whether he was also saying he had more sympathy with the story than just a desire to have that sort of loving connection with a woman. Was he also saying that had happened to him in the war?