The Ending


*POSSIBLE SPOILERS*

Did anyone else not get the ending or think that it ended to abrruptly?

reply

The reason people might not "get" the ending is because it was so different from Buster Keaton's better, previous movies. He doesn't get the girl! He just stands there upset. The old Buster would have come up with some way to get her back. What was MGM thinking, having that ending? When they gave this script to him? This movie was just awful. It only serves as an example of how MGM ruined Keaton's career.

reply

He wouldn't necessarily have gotten her back. (He doesn't get the girl in "Cops", either.) But he would have turned it into a dark, shuddering laugh somehow.


reply

Every other Buster Keaton movie I ever watched made me happy, including some of the supposedly bad ones. This one just made me sad. I think it was the ending. I refuse to ever watch it again.

"I now pronounce you man and wife. Proceed to the execution."
--The African Queen

reply

I know. This ending really depressed me. That's the main reason why I don't like to watch it.

reply

this film was pretty good. of course, when weighing it based on it being a buster keaton film, it was far far farrrrr inferior to even the worst of his usual works.
he was robbed entirely of his true comedic talents at the lame expense of 25 watt puns and dialogue sequences making his character seem slower than the "boost" in his career as a result from this film out....the whole bit about the queen has swooned broke my heart beyond means. yuck!

the payoffs were number one hearing his voice for the first time( how abruptly appropiate it was in the very beginning). singing was a different note as well. you may have been able to tell from his physical bravado and expertise that he is a very talented dancer as well.

his usual slapstick scenarios were far and few between in this film, the ones within were sort of worth it. i loved the clown makeup(not the costumes), you could really feel what he was thinking. and really, i liked it that he didn't get the girl in the end. it was something really different from what he would usually do....he is a very skilled dramatic actor(just look at the very last shot) i certainly had a couple of tears. especially since i was not expecting that turnout at all. i knew elvira would swoon to larry, but out of instinct expected elmer to somehow get her back. that didn't happen, so with that reality...the ending was truly heartbraking. even more heartbraking is knowing just how much buster hates doing drama.

basically, there were a lot of things i didn't like, a few i really did enjoy. for me, it was a bittersweet experience. but i honestly did like the ending.

p.s. let's face it, she wasn't good enough for him anyway

-i need a nap-

reply

MGM must have thought that creepy, slimy, lying Robt Montgomery would naturally be preferable to the honest, earnest, protective character of Keaton's. So, "here's the ending, and get out of our theater so we can sell your seat again!" hehe

ps - Montgomery seemed slimy in every role I've ever seen

reply

After finishing the trio of movies on the TCM collection, I found Spite Marriage more depressing than Free & Easy. At least there was no masterpiece in Keaton talkies he had to live up to!

Robert Montgomery was an upright, good guy in a John Ford movie; what was it...he seemed unsure about Buster slurring in their "intimate" scene. Looked offscreen to director, "should I continue?" Poor buster.

reply

"I found Spite Marriage more depressing than Free & Easy"

I thought spite marriage was wonderful. No Buster movie left me quite as depressed as Free and Easy and it just felt like an extremelyu depressing ending to the TCM collection.

reply

Robert Montgomery was a fine actor, and his performance in Ford's "They Were Expendable" was the most believable depiction of "an officer and a gentleman" ever put on film. Even in films where he was a conflicted hero--"Ride the Pink Horse" and "Lady in the Lake"--he wasn't anything but slimy.

reply

Yeah, the ending kind of stunk, especially after watching many of his earlier films prior where he's an indomitable character that receives rewards in the end. In this one he looked defeated.


"Keep Ted Turner and his goddamned Crayolas away from my movie."--Welles


reply

As an audience we just expect the humble Buster to prevail with the starlet. Before he moved to MGM, he would have. Free and Easy is of a piece with post-Zeppo Marx Brothers films at Metro, where the fellows clown and pimp for the young romantic leads. Of course the Marx films are superior, but I enjoyed Free and Easy in many places, and it was surely worthwhile to see from an historical vantage as his first sound feature. In the MGM universe of the time, Keaton gets top billing and Bob Montgomery gets the girl.

reply

How can anyone not see that the ending of Free and Easy is BRILLIANT? I didn't think much of the movie until the ending, and then I was bowled over. I personally think that Buster Keaton(with Charlie Chaplin) is the greatest screen comedian of all-time, but with one unbroken shot he proved that he is a great dramatic actor also. He loves Elvira, but when he sees that she loves Larry and Larry loves her back, Elmer realizes that he had waited too long and that stepping out of the way of their happiness is the best and only path. He loves her so much that he wants her to be happy even if it isn't with him. All this conveyed in four wordless shots. Elvira blowing a kiss to Larry; Larry looking at Elvira with love in his heart; Elvira returning the same look back to Larry; and finally Elmer witnessing the connection between the two, realizing that he is too late, understanding that he must step aside, and as he accepts his fate he closes his eyes which reveals his make-up to be a caricature of "the great stone face" that Buster Keaton was famous for. With that final shot having Buster convey all that heartbreaking emotion in the foreground as the chorus line dances joyfully in the backround. Truly brilliant filmmaking.

reply

Well-spoken, one9deuce. It is a LOT easier to appreciate these vintage MGM films if you forget how well Buster did his own thing - and created his own silent character - during the 20s.

MGM and sound was supposed to be a new era for everyone (and the audience forgot the silent era and its stars almost overnight). F&E is an interesting first step in a sound Buster character that we were never to see developed or exploited, due to BK's troubles, MGM's stubbornness, myopia, whatever. Keaton could have become a sad tragician in another world, but instead, he became Durante's drunken foil.

Another post notes, also, F&E has some GREAT behind-the-scenes MGM footage and stuff. You have to get your thrills where they're offered.

"That must have happened when the dough fell in the toolbox."

Roger 212

reply

Are we talking about the same movie or are there two movies with the same title made in the same year with the same actors? F & E had one sexy musical number and the rest of the movie? Er...Let's just say that I don't understand what the people above are talking about.

reply

"one sexy musical number and the rest of the movie?"

it did have a musical number but it wasnt very sexy.

reply

Not that I really want to argue anything in this movie's behalf, but I thought the girl--Was it Doris MacMahan?--looked pretty nice.

reply

Yes, the girl is Doris McMahon and I agree she is pretty nice!!

reply

Free & Easy is just Freakin' depressing. It causes me to drink.

There is nothing good in the film and the only good thing about the ending is you can stop watching this POS.

Not all Keaton's movies end happily if you include the shorts although the "unhappy" endings to Cops (when the girl turns him down and opens the doors) and even better The Boat (He mouths the DAMFINO boat name) are *beep* awesome!!!!

reply

This ending seems to go along similar lines as City Lights - the guy who is (likely) not to get the girl makes eye contact and they both realize the affair is doomed. Buster becomes passive in the MGM talkies, and in real life he became (had to become?) passive in directing his career. Another reason why F&E, with all its flaws, resonates with us, who like to follow our favorite film makers, even through the low points.

Roger 212
"That must have happened when the dough fell into the toolchest."

reply

PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Do not compare the ending Free and Easy to City Lights (or Cops). Just because they don't get the girl ends all similarities.

Chaplin in all his glory creates one of the most heartbreaking scenes ever on his terms.

Keaton is in some stupid clown costume dancing and probably hung over. And they just happy the POS is over. Keaton does not get the girl in Cops but has a great scene of opening the doors and stone face throwing himself to the officers.

reply

If Keaton was allowed to make a film on his terms I doubt he would appear to be "in some stupid clown costume," and he is grossely underrated as a filmmaker because of the downturn his contract MGM led him in whereas Chaplin still had his own creative control.

reply

"That must have happened when the dough fell into the toolchest."

Love that title card!!
You know you're Keaton-obsessed when you know all the title cards to all his silents. Lately, I've been very obsessed, well, because he's gorgeous!!

reply

I have this movie as an also-ran with the Buster Keaton Collection (it includes the genuinely great The Cameraman, the okay Spite Marriage, and a good documentary about Buster), and the ending was the only part I watched. It almost made me cry. Weird ending for a comedy. I can't help but think Buster's sadness in that scene is real though.

What's the Spanish for drunken bum?

reply

The ending brought a lot of weight to the film. It made it more sincere and even though we may not like it, was more true to life. The movie as a whole has a lot of flaws but the ending was pure gold!

Just because it doesn't make you happy doesn't mean it's not good.


.:Time You Enjoy Wasting Is Not Wasted Time:.

reply