Actual Film Length


I recorded this on VHS several years ago(before it was restored)at a running time of 1:43. I just watched it on TCM (restored) at 1:25. What happened to the missing 18 minutes?



"Are my eyes really brown?"

reply

I'm presuming it's just the usual matter of what projection speed the silent movie was reproduced at. Even though a silent movie can look pretty much identical if projected, at time of copying, at slightly faster or slightly slower speed - often not enough speed difference for a casual viewer to readily notice (either can look entirely natural) - it can make a considerable difference in presentation length. This question arises frequently where variant copies of silent movies are concerned.

As a sentence in the Wikipedia feature article about silent movies states, "Film speed is often a vexed issue among scholars and film buffs in the presentation of silents today, especially when it comes to DVD releases of restored films."

reply

Thank you, genplant29. That is a terrific explanation.

"Are my eyes really brown?"

reply

You're very welcome. I used to often wonder the same, until eventually discovering what the usual main cause of the discrepancy issue is.

For more information on the topic, see the "Projection speed" section of the following interesting Wikipedia article:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silent_film

reply

The original film length is 2:16:30. There's another version at 1:39:00. It's more than likely the shorter version came out first after restoration, and subsequent editions followed when missing elements were found around 2001, I believe. Plus, a lot of the original negatives were mixed and missing title cards. I read some versions have added title cards to them not original to the film.

I believe Kino Entertainment has two versions out: a shorter version on their DVD release and a longer version on their Bluray but I'm not 100% positive of that, it's something I read awhile ago.

-Nam

I'm on the road less traveled...

reply