Protected class - David Hogg Discussion

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Man that sucks that your post expressing your desire to face punch a teenage survivor of a mass shooting got deleted. Gosh are you ok? Need to talk? It's sad how these message board rules are holding you back from being your best self!

reply

[–] Gary O. (997) 5 years ago

I said in the thread that I did not like Hogg. I still don't.

reply

[–] QOK (1504) 5 years ago

You seem like you need therapy. Hopefully you get it.

As for Hogg, word is he wasn't even at the school during the shooting. What did he survive?

It seems this thread exploded though so it backfired on whoever reported the original thread.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

As for Hogg, word is he wasn't even at the school during the shooting. What did he survive?

Is that what the word is? Because the truth is that he was in environmental science class when the shooting began, and ended up hiding in a culinary arts classsroom. This has been confirmed by other students and faculty. There are also those that accused him of being a crisis actor. Whether you disagree with his activism and views on gun control or not, trying to minimize the tragedy he lived through is wrong.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

That was censorship, plain and simple.

And a load of BS.

I guess his gay lover reported the thread.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

No, it was a post that was in clear violation of the rules and the mods have every right to delete posts that violate the rules. You agree to the terms when you sign up to post here. If you don't like it, go elsewhere (simple right?). The post didn't address Hogg's positions and why they may have not been incorrect. It simply said he'd like to punch him in the face.

Incidentally the rule in question from the user agreement in the prohibited content section under standards:

2) Content that threatens or advocates for harm on oneself or others, or otherwise violent content

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

lol oh gosh no you called me gay...I'm devastated. It's not only the laziest insult out there but also the most outdated.

reply

[–] Gary O. (997) 5 years ago

Was the phrase 'the most punchable face' used? I mean in the deleted thread.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I think it was the title of it, or something along those lines.

reply

[–] Gary O. (997) 5 years ago

Granted, it was not very nice, but I didn't see it as a threat.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

For the record I didn't report the previous thread or even comment on it. I saw it though and found it kind of lame. Someone clearly must've reported it though and the mods agreed. Their decision, which is fine by me.

reply

[–] QOK (1504) 5 years ago

Sure you didn't. You sure have a lot to say about it now though.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

And by the way...

He didn’t advocate violence against the kid.

Saying someone’s face is punchable is not advocating violence.

It’s just an adjective like...”kissable” lips or “edible” mushroom.

Ciao

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Kissing someone isn't violent (except the way my ex did it). Punching someone is.

Ciao

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Otter (24464) 5 years ago

Okay, I HATE to defend someone who is obviously a massive asshole, but...

Saying someone looks "punchable" or "slappable" isnt the same thing as stating an intention to punch or slap someone. The words are commonly used to describe someone who makes you remember which hand you use for bitchslaps (real or imimagined), but it's a description of a feeling of annoyance and not a threat.

And shaddup about "censorship". The terms of service state what is not tolerated, if you dont like the terms of service fuck off to some other site.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

I get what you're saying and you may be right. I wasn't the one who reported the thread nor did I even comment on it. And I don't remember exactly what was said in the thread so it's possible the punchable thing went beyond the subject line but I honestly dont know. But the mods obviously made a judgement call and it's their's to make. I think this thread complaining about that being deleted is just lame though...is it really that important that a thread calling a teenager punchable get to stay? I mean seriously how old are we here?

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Honestly how old are you? Your insults are not only insanely immature, the anti-gay rhetoric is really dated.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

[deleted]

[–] StinkyPoopyPants (2680) 5 years ago

"Kissing someone isn't violent (except the way my ex did it)"

Lmao! Sounds like we had the same ex XD

reply

[–] QOK (1504) 5 years ago

Good for you to have memorized the rule book here. But the reporting of that post has backfired. This thread is pushing 50 replies.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Wow 50 replies between a total of 10 people (one of whom had the majority of his posts deleted)...not sure MC has the bandwidth to handle such a raging success lol

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

You're confused! Trump is the bully who name calls, starts trouble and is into abusing young children by tearing them out of their mother's arms and placing them in cages.
https://amp.businessinsider.com/images/5cf4d8ed11e2053220356d93-750-375.jpg

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

Just for the record, the Obama Administration used the same facilities and "cages" to detain people illegally crossing the border. Not defending it, but they're both guilty.

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

Lies! Stop drinking the Kool-aid and making excuses for a sociopath who believes a mob of hundreds of neo-Nazis marching in the streets of America screaming, "Jews will not replace us!" are very find people.

Save yourself and get deprogrammed now!

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

Not lies, facts.

https://www.businessinsider.com/migrant-children-in-cages-2014-photos-explained-2018-5

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

You're deflecting! That article has nothing to do with "abusing young children by tearing them out of their mother's arms and placing them in cages" which Trump had done. Typical sociopath behavior. And I'll add that Trump is also killing these young children since four of them have already died.

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

I agree that seperating children from their parents was an inexcusable idea, but the article I posted did indeed point out that the Obama Administration kept people in the same exact conditions.

Also, Trump isn't killing anyone. Please stop being hysterical. Lets look at the facts.
So far, 24 immigrants have sadly passed away in ICE Custody, which is on pace with the 78 who died under the previous administration.

Under Trumps administration, 4 people in custody die per 100,000 a year. That is an incredibly low number considering in the US 28 people per 100,000 between the ages of 5-18 die each year.

On the subject of illegal immigration, I'm not ok with it. These people are abusing the asylum system when in fact they are economic migrants. If they want to come here, they need to get in line and do it the legal way, like my father and his family did.

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

"I agree that seperating children from their parents was an inexcusable idea"

Everything else you wrote is irrelevant.

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

Not really. It's pertinent to the conversation. To say is he is "killing children" is completely disingenuous.

Mistakes happen. Where was the outrage when Obama placed immigrant CHILDREN with human traffickers?
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/did-obama-administration-children-human-traffickers/

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

Deflection!

Trump is still ripping young children out of their mothers' arms and placing them in cages. And they are dying. Did I mention how he is teargassing children?

Are you defending Trump because he called you and your friends "very fine people." Are you the one with the beard in this video?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n12sjwk9FBE

Not one woman. You all must be intels.

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

I'm not defending Trump. I didn't even vote for the guy. I'm simply pointing on your hypocrisy with facts, while you continue to be hysterical. Are you even aware that family separation stopped a long time ago?

And about tear gas, its a common method that has been always used by border patrol. Tear gas was actually used 79 times towards migrants trying to illegally enter the country under Obama.
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/12/several-administrations-used-tear-gas-at-the-border/

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

More Deflection!

"City of Deming says Border Patrol continues to separate migrant children from families"
https://cbs4local.com/news/local/city-of-deming-says-border-patrol-continues-to-separate-migrant-children-from-families-06-15-2019

It's still being done - unofficially. Most are unreported.

Btw, you stupidly believe that anyone who criticizes Trump is automatically a supporter of Obama and Clinton. You're wrong so stop bringing them up. Nobody cares. The focus is on the present and future which can be changed.

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

More hysterics!

"CBP said the only reason separations like these would happen is if they determined the children didn’t belong to the families in question."

I never said anyone who criticizes Trump is automatically a supporter of Obama and Clinton. My point is that they used the some of the same tactics at the border and no one said a word - hence the hypocrisy.

Question: Are you ok with economic migrants abusing the asylum system? These people are not refugees. If your ok with this, then your part of the problem. If they want to come here, get in line an do it legally.

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

Trump already admitted that he wanted to separate children from their mothers as a deterrent. A sociopath who doesn't care about children won't care about the truth either.

A 2 year old screaming "mama!" while being torn from his mother's arms is ample proof that he does belong to the family. Your "justification" for child abuse is vile.

Why don't you think for yourself instead of repeating pathological liar Trump's rhetoric?

Facts:
Illegal immigration has been falling since 2007. Violence in the Northern Triangle is a major driver of emigration from there.

All migrants have a LEGAL RIGHT to due process and a right to apply for asylum. An immigration judge determines if they have a legitimate asylum claim - not you.

Trump hired illegal immigrants to work for him. How come you're not complaining about that?

reply

[–] Padeen (6459) 5 years ago

I do think for myself. Your the one who sounds like your reading off script. I've debunked all of your lies with facts.

Yes, illegal crossings are statistically at a 20 year low, but The U.S. Border Patrol still apprehended nearly 400,000 people crossing the Mexico-U.S. border in 2018, up roughly 100,000 from the prior year....These numbers are concerning and your being willfully ignorant if you think these people are legitimate refugees - economic migrants don't apply for asylum.....They get a green card and go through the naturalization process.

If violence and generally unsafe conditions in the Northern Triangle were grounds for asylum, then EVERYONE could claim that reason and just be let in, unfairly skipping ahead of the people doing it legally. And if they were actual refugees, the law says they are supposed to apply for asylum in the nearest country...So why aren't they applying for asylum in Mexico? Didn't they at one point offer the migrants JOBS and EDUCATION for their children?

Anyone who knowingly hires illegal immigrants should be charged with a crime. This has never been political for me. I've always been staunchly against illegal crossings and have always and will always support those who want to come to American legally.

We need MAJOR immigration reform to stop the flow of illegal crossing into this country, however:
1. Kids who were brought here as children should be allowed to stay.
2. Those who are already here and have made a life for themselves should be allowed to stay, as long as they have not committed any crimes.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8081) 5 years ago

And I'll add that Trump is also killing these young children since four of them have already died.

Paranoid, off-kilter partisan drivel.

If these people didn't illegally enter a foreign country in the first place NO ONE would be contained and there would be no possibility of anyone (inadvertently) dying. Problem solved.

I should add that Trump was 1000-2000 miles away when these deaths occurred.

As for the four deaths, that's a sincere shame but you ironically support a party that advocates & even celebrates the murders of MILLIONS of babies every year (almost 3000 per DAY), including survivors of abortion that they just leave on the table to die, the cold bastages. So you have no place lecturing border agents/policies on the proper care of children.

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

Of course, a sociopath troll like yourself would justify young children being killed. And you're making light of a school shooting in which more children have died.

You also lost any right to pretend you care about abortion when you allowed babies to be ripped from their mothers arms and put in cages. Hypocrite!

Typical sociopath behavior of you and the nut in the White House!

BTW dummy, it's legal internationally and nationally for anyone to seek asylum. What's illegal is to deny a person that right. Go read a law book and learn something useful instead of trolling!

reply

[–] Wuchak (8081) 5 years ago

Whenever someone resorts to ad hominem bluster they're losing the debate.

Do you seriously believe these people are really seeking "asylum"? Do you know what seeking asylum actually means? These illegals simply want to get on the ridiculous welfare programs that the US provides thru loony Dems who are seeking a reliable voting block for the future.

Also, I guess you missed the memo on how these kids aren't even their children in most cases. They acquire them to win Lib sympathy and help them unlawfully enter the USA.

Answer me this: How come you're frothing in hysterics over four accidental deaths on the border and not the MILLIONS of intentional murders of babies every year in America? Blind fool!

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

I just want to know what the wages are for Russian sock puppets? Your fellow comrades are being deleted. Scroll up! LOL!

reply

[–] robocat893 (13354) 5 years ago

...MILLIONS of intentional murders of babies every year in America

If there were millions of babies being murdered how come you cannot provide a single reliable news source proving this? If this were really happening it would be front page news. Even on Fox News.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8081) 5 years ago

I specified almost 3000 a day, so do the math: That's 1.058 million Abortions per year in America: https://www.all.org/learn/abortion/abortion-statistics/

How come this isn't emphasized in the lamestream media? Because Libs don't think human beings with heartbeats in the womb are babies -- i.e. human beings -- but rather fetuses with no rights that can be legally murdered at whim; it's the same thing with survivors of abortion lying on a table.

reply

[–] robocat893 (13354) 5 years ago

American Life League is a right wing religious website that is complete bullshit. Their abortion statistics are made up with nothing to back up their claims. They also claim that birth control is the same as abortion. That's just ridiculous.

So I ask you, please provide a link to a RELIABLE news source to back up these claims. Surely if millions of babies are being murded each year (3000 a day) it would be all over the news.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8081) 5 years ago

I said almost 3000 (i.e. 2800).

a right wing religious website that is complete bullshit

Says who? You? Prove it. A Rightwing (simple common sense wisdom) Christian website has far more credibility than a godless Lib site.

But, let's say -- for the sake of argument -- it's HALF of what I cited or even a third. They're all outrageous numbers.

But continue on in your blinded, deluded Leftie fantasyland; nothing to see here.

reply

[–] robocat893 (13354) 5 years ago

After reading some of your other posts here you seem to be very miserable. I almost feel sorry for you. Maybe you should turn off your computer and leave your trailer park once in awhile. The world is not as scary as Trump has you to believe.

Oh, I'm still waiting for your news source to back up your claims.

reply

[–] Wuchak (8081) 5 years ago

My supposedly being miserable is irrelevant, a common Lib deflection tactic. Nevertheless, I acknowledge that what they say about "ignorance is bliss" is valid to some degree.

Yet I don't get what your problem is concerning the data I cited on abortion/infanticide in America since it's commonly known. Even Lib sources like Kathleen Parker admit that there have been over 50 million abortions since Roe vs. Wade in 1973, as noted in the second half of her most recent editorial: https://siouxcityjournal.com/opinion/columnists/kathleen-parker-how-about-a-plan-for-making-abortion-irrelevant/article_18ddbdd0-92f3-5c60-956c-ac2017a4706b.html.

Do the math, what's that come out to? A little over 1 million a year. It's not rocket science. The source I cited above -- which you claimed is "complete bullshit" -- stated 1.058 million Abortions per year in America. This agrees with Ms. Parker's stat. Where's the beef? There is none, but you apparently work for Planned Parenthood so it's in your best interest to play down the actual facts. I understand.

By the way, I live in a nice house with three properties and an additional cottage, where do you live?

reply

[–] Keelai (31804) 5 years ago

People who are miserable want other people to be miserable along with them.

Putting a woman in prison because she doesn't want to be pregnant by her rapist is barbaric A police officer or government official "questioning" a woman who just miscarried to ensure she didn't have an abortion is also barbaric.

Women with money will still have abortions like they always have by buying a plane ticket. The backward laws only punish women who are impoverished who will seek unsafe methods like wire hangers or the new black market which will be created.

reply

[–] [deleted] 5 years ago

Do us all a favor and go hang yourself I'll pay for the rope and the ladder.

reply

[–] QOK (1504) 5 years ago

Whoever reported that other thread had it backfire. Now this thread is twice as hot.

reply

[–] SeussMyTub (226) 5 years ago

It'a true though. He does have a punchable face LOL

reply