MovieChat Forums > Ben Shapiro Discussion > Smug, entitled, arrogant prick.

Smug, entitled, arrogant prick.


He has the look of a bratty 14 year old boy who refuses to clean up his room.

reply

Definitely not hot.👎🏽

reply

[deleted]

Why yes he does.
However, he also has solid arguments in many political topics which, crazy I know, may or may not be more important than what he looks like...

But you do you, don't change.

reply

Except he doesn't. Stupid people only think he's intelligent because he talks fast. But if you slow down his arguments, alot of his points are actually quite ridiculous. People have short attention spans, so they don't pick up on that.

There's a reason he usually only debates dumb college kids. He knows he has no chance with anyone else.

reply

"But if you slow down his arguments, alot of his points are actually quite ridiculous."

Name a few.

reply

Here's an excellent video that discusses his tactics and gives examples. https://youtu.be/KcTx_SXun_4

Remember when he walked out of that cringe worthy BBC interview with Andrew Neil (who wasn't even debating Shapiro just asking questions)? That tells you all you need to know about BS.

Like I said, he should stick to debating below average undergrad students.

reply

"Here's an excellent video that discusses his tactics and gives examples."
You must have send the wrong video, because all I saw was a video from a very salty and aggressive person that obviously hates Shapiro's guts.
He started right away by making the video personal despite calling it "Ten Horrible Ben Shapiro Arguments Debunked"

He did not debunk anything, he at best raised some counter-arguments but that doesn't make the opponent's argument magically disappear nor wrong.

I only watched it to 1/4, I can think of better ways to waste my time.
If someone *actually* has an argument(!), I am all ears.
So far all I heard were personal attacks and insults, which says a lot though.

reply

+1

reply

Andrew Neil breakdown: https://youtu.be/qJ8bcM9GVqE

reply

Most of his arguments are correct, his real problem is word choice. You can't use college vocabulary when the other side is filled with people that are unlikely to have better than a middle school vocabulary. His biggest fail is not taking into account his audience.

reply

Someone like you would say that. You are a boot licker.

reply

Just because you get off licking people's feet doesn't many anyone else does, ya foolish cunt.

reply

[deleted]

There are two ways to be at the top of the class: be very smart or be an extreme sycophant. This dbag seems like he falls into the latter group.

reply

[deleted]

Teacher’s pet. He fits the mold. Priggish. It takes a special sort of cunning to be a successful sycophant, but it doesn’t mean the person is entirely intelligent.

reply

Teacher's Pet doesn't work at Harvard Law. Intelligence and hard work does.

reply

He debates college kids because democratic leadership is scared to debate him.

reply

[deleted]

Three months in and you have yet to address a single position Shapiro has taken.
But you don't like his face.
Well, who can argue with that?

reply

I take it you don't like people who speak the truth about the left.

reply

Translated: "I'm offended by his politics"

reply

one of the few times i got seriously ratio'd and dragged on twitter was when i said something nice about ben shapiro.

i'm not fan of his, and i think he can be a bit silly sometimes, & a bit too willing to play footsie with some elements of trumpism, presumably because it's in his financial interest to do so.

but i think on economic issues, he's mostly rock solid, and all of his ideas area really well thought through, at least from what i've seen. i haven't listened to or read everything he's written.

reply