MovieChat Forums > Asia Kate Dillon Discussion > Genderqueer/Non-Binary

Genderqueer/Non-Binary

posted 5 years ago by Rorikon (16360)
18 replies | jump to latest

The heck? Had to look up the term special people make up so they feel normal about themselves. Apparently she can't wear any swimsuits that's been given a gender...

https://www.instyle.com/fashion/asia-kate-dillon-non-binary-style

In any case, she's pretty cool as the Adjudicator in John Wick 3.

[–] TandyMan (10317) 5 years ago

Well that was hard to read. All them confusing vague pronouns. Anyhow, she's a pretty interesting person. I've seen a few interviews with her.

[–] [deleted] 2 years ago

Everything about this person Asia Kate is hard to read: bios, interviews etc because of the confusing pronoun game. I bet even my life would be semi interesting if I start describing it with vague pronouns

[–] exatera (3942) 4 years ago

In any case, she's pretty cool as the Adjudicator in John Wick 3.

Did you really think that??
I was actually wondering how she even got the part - it didn't seem like she could act worth sh*t.

[–] Threadkiller (2947) 4 years ago

I just recently saw John Wick 3 & i have to say she was quite forgettable. Not much of a performance to speak of.

[–] exatera (3942) 4 years ago

You are being kind. She stunk up every scene she was in.

[–] Scape (503) 4 years ago

Tell me about it, “they” were terrible in every scene... Awful acting.

[–] Satan2016 (23240) 4 years ago

She has the face for a non-binary Joker.

[–] Kowalski (56921) 4 years ago

OH NO.

[–] DeckardB26354 (953) 2 years ago

IT, or whatever the flying fuck IT want's to call ITSELF or ITS swimsuits, is just another fucking Hollywood infiltration weirdo who is into all this fucking pathetic woke gender shite, that insists we all adhere to. Well IT can fuck off.

There are TWO GENDERS - MALE & FEMALE, and that has serious mental health issues, along with all the others who give themselves these stupid fucking labels.

[–] strntz (10766) 2 years ago

Well IT can fuck off.

Well, I'm sure it does. Just not sure by which method it accomplishes that.

[–] Mustang (5178) 2 years ago

“They” are pan sexual too. Who the fuck gets off on frying pans?

[–] Nate Adams SA23 (896) 2 years ago

I wonder if it's the non stick pans

[–] DeckardB26354 (953) 2 years ago

Fucking brilliant. LMAO.

[–] Mustang (5178) 2 years ago

I like hearing it as though it were being delivered by Rodney Dangerfield or Don Rickles.

[–] OvertonPendulum (4026) 2 years ago

I wonder how her boyfriend feels calling her "they". Personally the idea of calling my gf they makes me want to puke.

[–] Mustang (5178) 2 years ago

Something I've noticed with these Woke terms, they are very dehumanizing. "They" doesn't even have to pertain to a person.

[–] DeckardB26354 (953) 10 months ago

That whatever it is, has serious mental issues. That is all.

[–] Druff (1444) 10 months ago

Pretty much the only thing I didn't like about JW4 is that they didn't bring her back simply so Wick could put one right between her eyes. That was one of the only reasons I was looking forward to 4.