Are we seriously nominating children for Razzies now?

Well you have to be pretty pathetic to vote for the 'worst' of things so the joke is on them.

You know how they sometimes charge children as adults if they've committed a terrible crime? Its kind of like that. Audiences are being traumatized by Mackenzie's acting as much as a school shooting. She makes Nicholas Cage look like Daniel Day Lewis.

Mattshular, you're nuts. Just plain ole cray cray.

Audiences are being traumatized by Mackenzie's acting as much as a school shooting.



The rules that determine Razzie eligibility are the same as it is for the Oscars. Children can get Oscar nominations and win Oscars. Hence the same principles apply for the Razzies.

Are you one of those people who actually believes 'participation medals' are a good thing, and that children should be wrapped in cotton wool and protected from any form of criticism?




Never defend crap with 'It's just a movie'
http://www.youtube.com/user/BigGreenProds

1) Children have been nominated for Razzies for years. At least she wasn't nominated for acting.
2) So what? Are children incapable of being bad actors? Besides, if they can be nominated for Oscars, they should be able to be nominated for Razzies too.

Being that she was nominated for "worst couple" in Twilight, I also don't take it directly as a criticism of her acting (she was very good in Interstellar, for example), but merely a display of public opinion on the "adult Jacob imprinting on a newborn" thing.

65 Roses = Cystic Fibrosis