MovieChat Forums > Kellan Lutz Discussion > NOT a bankable lead actor!

NOT a bankable lead actor!


Hercules was a HUGE flop!

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

He looks so hot I don't care if he can act. I would eat his dirty socks. ...

reply

So did Dwanye Johnson big screen version flop and I bet it lost more money than Kellen's version. Kellen Lutz is absolutely drop dead gorgeous! Come on girls let show Hollywood we want eye candy too! I would watch him acting in anything.

reply

Was Arena and Java Heat bankable films on the Direct to DVD and VOD markets?

And did Tarzan make money?

reply

Wrong Dwayne Johnson version of Hercules made more money thane Kellan Lutz version of Hercules

Kellan Lutz version of Hercules

Legend of Hercules Domestic: $18,848,538

Foreign $42,430,914

Worldwide $61,279,452

opening weekend open at number 3 $8,868,318


Dwayne Johnson Version of Hercules

Domestic $72,688,614

Foreign $170,700,000

worldwide $243,388,614

opening weekend open at number 2 $29,800,263


Lara Croft Himiko! The First Sun Queen! This is Yamatai.

reply

I am thinking Hollywood agrees with the sentiment that Lutz isn't a bankable actor if he is filming TV shows instead of movies. He's done quite a few of them post- Twilight. A tv show would likely interfere quite a bit with any potential movies he might film.

Then again, who knows how much he is getting paid to show up on this tv show Bullseye? Seems like a kitschy kind of show. Perhaps he only cares about bank and not notoriety or fame...but considering he decided to work in Hollywood I doubt it.

reply

Deciding to release a major motion picture on the same day as Star Wars probably wasn't the best of decisions either.

He does not seem to be finding success in Hollywood. Pity since I appreciate his work.

reply