That's pretty much his best chance to get this verdict overturned... saying that to the world...
The only thing I respect Roger Goodell for is how he's stood his ground... he knows he's guilty, I know he's guilty... and everyone with "half a brain" (outside of Boston that is) knows he's guilty.
Wrong. Brady is innocent. I will prove it.
For the science, the following scientists/firms have demonstrated that no deflation occurred: John Leonard. Drew Fustin. HeadSmart Labs. Mide Technology. Dale Syphers. Michael Naughton. FLIR Systems.
Basically, a 20F drop = a 1psi drop. Rain causes an additional drop up to .7psi. The Pats' footballs averaged 11.5psig at halftime, the lowest was 10.9psig. That's within the expected effects of the ~50F raining weather.
No scientists have confirmed or even agreed with Wells' conclusion. Wells' report had instances of obvious bias. For proof, look at the images of the gauge needles - figure 3, page 15 of Exponent's appendix. They're measured from different points to make their difference in lengths seem smaller, so Wells' could more easily dismiss ref Walt Anderson's recollection that he used the logo gauge pre-game.
Wells/Exponent did an experiment to try to determine which gauge was used. See section VIIB for the explanation. The problem is, without precise temperature values for the pressure measurements, it's literally 100% impossible to experimentally determine which gauge was used.
The Colts' footballs did not appear to lose as much pressure because they were measured at the *end* of halftime. The Pats' were measured at the start of halftime. This means the Colts' had ~10 minutes to warm and dry while inside, and the Pats had little to no time. More time = more heat = more pressure. Newton's law of cooling.
If you think the May 2014 text with 'the deflator' matters, consider the following;
Months later, during a cold November Pats@Packers game, McNally texted Jastremski "deflate and give somebody that jacket" when he saw him on TV on the sideline wearing a thick jacket and holding another. This definitively demonstrates a different meaning for the word.
In an October 2014 text, Jastremski mentions to his fiancee after a Pats v Jets game that the footballs were nearly 16psig, but they were "supposed to be 13" This demonstrates it was not their goal to go outside the legal limit.
Brady's phone. As posted on Brady's FB: "I replaced my broken Samsung phone with a new iPhone 6 AFTER my attorneys made it clear to the NFL that my actual phone device would not be subjected to investigation under ANY circumstances."
This means his phone was not evidence. It was never going to be evidence. Therefore, destroying it was not tantamount to destroying evidence.
Besides, Wells went through McNally and Jastremski's phones and found no evidence of a scheme. In order to believe Brady's phone had other evidence, you've got to believe he texted it only to someone BESIDES the last 2 guys to handle footballs before a game. That is completely illogical.
If their texts are indicative of any kind of deflation, it's because Jastremski pumps up footballs to rub them down with rags/brushes, then gives them to McNally to set them to the desired pressure before the pre-game inspection. Not tampering, just preparing footballs together legally.
There was no motive to tamper with the footballs. In 2006 Brady got other QBs to support him in petitioning the league to change a rule, allowing teams to alter the surface texture of footballs. This means if Brady wanted pressure outside the legal limit, he could have just gotten that rule changed. There was no need to sneak around. His 2015 stats were better than the previous FOUR seasons. The Patriots 2015 fumble rate was as remarkable as any other year. There's no apparent statistical advantage.
There is no evidence the footballs were ever tampered with.
There is no evidence anyone wanted to tamper with them.
There is no motive to tamper with them.
Even if he was guilty, the NFL penalty for tampering with equipment is 25 thousand dollars. Not a million dollars, not draft picks, and not suspending a quarterback.
This is a total over reach of authority by Goodell. I would have preferred for Brady to personally sue Goodell even if he had to leave football to do it.
Never proven guilty and pretty much debunked by science. Goodell suspended Brady for an excessive 4 games for one reason. He wanted to take the Patriots out of Super Bowl contention-basically handicapping them. Goodell was celebrating at half time, only to crap his pants a quarter later.
share