Prettier than Juliette Binoche - Sally Hawkins Discussion

yes

reply

Sally Hawkins was a real beauty back in her day. This is her RADA photo from 1998:

https://www.rada.ac.uk/profiles/sally-hawkins/

reply

[–] John Kyle (647) 2 years ago

Still is a beauty

reply

[–] whynotwriteme (7120) 2 years ago

Sorry, my friend... I just do not see that at all. Neither woman in this shot is by any means a glamor queen, but even in this plain duo, Hawkins comes off a distant second in the looks category. (Not that I find either woman at all attractive.) In addition to being rawboned and homely, Hawkins looks like a snotty assistant librarian. At least the other woman looks pleasant-natured and feminine, without that Ichabod Crane in drag air to her.

https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/aaa/83d/a52620aefe84d6c469f0145d9c10e5f013-08-shape-of-water.rsquare.w700.jpg

The 1998 photo of Hawkins was nice, but Jesus, what happened in those 23 years? Must have been a fluke shot.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 2 years ago

Sally came down with lupus ( an autoimmune disease ) in late 2008 I think it was and has been affected by it on and off ever since. She dropped a lot of weight at stages and looked very unwell.

reply

[–] whynotwriteme (7120) 2 years ago

Well, I feel bad that she's sick, but I still cannot say she is attractive to me.

reply

[–] Otter (24464) 3 years ago

Well, maybe from the neck down, Hawkins did some nude scenes in "The Shape of Water" and she's got a great figure!

But the face has always been cute, but never classically beautiful.

reply

[–] Quasimodo (16388) 3 years ago

Don't tell me Otter, her eyes are crooked and she hasn't got enough hair on her face !