i was rooting for someone much younger and hotter... cause that's the way dan brown described her... but oh well they changed a lot in the film adaptation anyways so there's no point in having to insist that she's not the real vittoria...
shareThis message has been deleted by the poster
shareI thought Ayelet did a much better job than I originally thought. While she may not be "hot" like Megan Fox or Angelina Jolie, she has, in my eyes, a classical beauty similar to Sophia Loren or Julie Christie.
We will be cruel to the Germans, and through our cruelty, they will know who we are.
Ayelet brought credibility to the character something the book was lacking.
shareI agree, she did a great job. I think she played a more professional and mature Vittoria than in the book.
I'm also greateful she was dressed in proper clothes than looking like a hot chick. And I also liked that they kept her attraction to Langdon out of the movie.
I think in casting Vittoria they reacted to criticism of the choice of Audrey Tatou as Sophie Neveu in The Da Vinci Code. Tatou was widely considered a bit green for the part.
shareShe's so YUMMY! I was staring at her alot while watching Angels and Demons! :P
The Joker: You prefer a magic trick, instead? Watch me make this pencil disappear
I realize I must have been out of the loop in a big way, but I could have sworn that I read that Maggie Gyllenhall was going to play Vittoria. I haven't seen the movie yet so I can't give an opinion but I was certainly shocked to see a pic of Vittoria. Trying to explain the character from the book to my husband, I realized all over again what a complex casting decision she would be. I look forward to seeing it.
shareShe's more beautiful, and a better actress than Angelina and Megan combined, IMO.
share