We have approximately 245 days until President Trump is President again.
Rejoice for the Trump shall return!
cant wait. he will be an ever better President than before!
shareYou lot are UTTERLY DELUSIONAL, and so is your LORD AND MASTER.
shareYour lot think men in frocks are women, don't talk to anyone else about delusion.
shareActually, I don't think that.
Actually you do. You made it binary with the you lot statement, you're not part of my lot so you're part of your lot and your lot think men in frocks are women.
share"You made it binary with the you lot statement"
The difference is your lot believe 99% of Trump bullshit
I mean ... just look at how many supporters believe ninjas with pillows stuffed the ballot boxes in the middle of the night - because DT told you they did.
while only about 1% of the other lot believe "men in frocks are women"
Well you did vote for a dementia patient, just saying.
sharewe need Trump back stat!
shareHow would Trump improve himself?
Less golf?
Fewer gun grabs?
Fewer lies?
Less flag groping?
Less gushing over dictators?
Salute fewer North Korean generals?
Less Putin boot licking?
Less voter fraud?
Why couldn't we have the better Trump back in 2016 instead?
it will be Trump 2.0. the same Trump but better.
shareSo more golf, more gun grabs, more groping, more dictator gushing, more Putin boot licking and more phones calls to find more votes that were not placed?
shareat least Trump can play golf,. diaper joe can barely walk up stairs.
shareTrump sure plays lots of golf. He said he would be too busy to play golf while president, but he had plenty of time on the course anyway.
sharenothing wrong with staying active and healthy. meanwhile your turd of a president said he loves chocolate chip ice cream.
shareYou're honestly going to argue that Trump is physically healthier than Biden? Maybe if Trump lost 75 pounds.
There's a difference between loving a dessert (which most people do) and overindulging in said dessert.
And golf is hardly an aerobic activity.
go play 18 holes and then let me know if golf is hard or not.
sharePlayed 36 yesterday. Golf is not hard physically. Just seems that way because the majority of people who play are old as hell or fat as hell(in Trumps case both) and a medium length walk would be physically demanding to them.
Also, Trump is a massive golf cheat. Who throws a tournament, misses the first day, and declares he can use his score from earlier in the week to count as his round 1, totally screwing the other competitors? Just a POS in every way.
its not physically hard like football or hockey, but if you walk all 18 holes then you will be exhausted by the end. even pros have said playing 18 holes is demanding. if you are riding in a golf cart then yeah, it will be easy.
if you walked 36 holes than I assume you are in top physical condition. a round of golf is typically 3 hours and you might walk 4 to 5 miles.
I walked the first 18 since I was alone and later in the day, I rode the second cause I was with a group.
But I'd bet everything I have that Trump doesn't walk a round of golf. He plays the way most elderly people play, which is to minimize the physical activity part of it.
more than likely he uses a golf cart. at least he is outside doing something, most people over 70 just sit inside.
shareI said it wasn't an aerobic workout. It's not. Some golfers do walk between the holes but not necessarily at a brisk pace, so it doesn't necessarily raise their heart rate, which is what is needed in order to make it aerobic.
Also, do you think Trump walks between holes? I'm pretty sure he rides in a golf cart.
a round of golf is typically 3 hours and you might walk 4 to 5 miles. if you are in good shape then its not a big deal but its still tiring, especially if the temps are over 85.
I am sure he rides in a golf cart but at 75, just getting outside and doing something is good at his age. most people his age just sit inside and watch tv.
What is your point? That Trump is healthy because he goes outside and rides around in a golf cart for a few hours?
I won't pretend that I have examined his medical records, but he is most certainly not considered healthy.
its healthier than just sitting in a chair all day. I would say Trump is healthier than Biden thats for sure. he cant even walk up stairs.
shareIs that the best you've got? Biden tripped on the stairs one time, so he's unhealthy? Trump is not even close to being as healthy as Biden.
Everyone trips occasionally. Even Trump. Even you.
Trump is extremely healthy, he just gave a 2 hour speech in 87 degree weather, meanwhile Joe said he likes chocolate chip ice cream.
shareNow that is just sad. I almost feel sorry for you. Oh my gosh! He admits that ice cream tastes good! Alert the media! Cover your children’s ears. Not ice cream! Scandalous!!!!!!!!!
sharehe joked he had ice cream when 3 kids were just murdered, thats messed up.
shareDJT said the following about Covid-19:
"It’s going to disappear. One day — it’s like a miracle — it will disappear. And from our shores, we — you know, it could get worse before it gets better. It could maybe go away. We’ll see what happens. Nobody really knows.share
President Trump
February 27, 2020
You don't get to talk about how something Joe said is messed up when the other person in the discussion is Trump.
shareI dont mind talking about Trump. tell me more about him....
remember when Trump put America first? I miss those days...
Every president in US history has put America first. If you believe otherwise, it's because you take what Trump says at face value. Which is never a good idea.
shareBiden is putting Ukraine first. and he has done nothing to BBB yet.
shareDo elaborate. How is Biden putting Ukraine first?
And what does Bergen Brass Band have to do with this?
when does BBB start?
shareYou really are a sad little clown. The only reason you bump months or even years old posts is because you're too stupid to post anything original.
shareat least I am not obsessed with Boebert. she doesnt know you exist and will never date you.
shareYet you are obsessed with Trump. He won't date you either.
shareI support and voted for Trump twice and will vote for Trump a third time. you support a dementia patient but yet you dont even talk about him.
you are jealous of republicans because we have all the hot women.
https://wealthyspy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Kayleigh-McEnany-1.jpg
Not only does he ride, but he drives on the green like an asshole to minimize the walking!
shareIf I became President, I'd be the only one in modern times who disliked playing golf. I know I'd have to play it with other politicians. But they'd hate playing it with me cause it'd take me 4 hours to get halfway through the game. Then after the other politicians beat me and left I'd just leave the game unfinished, go to the white house, and watch my favorite action movie. CNN and Fox both would be talking about my poor golfing skills.
share'👍👍👍
shareAll still better than what the other guy has done, which is nothing. Thats why nobody talks about him.
shareSo Trump sucks, but he doesn't suck as much as Biden? We can do way better. We deserve way better.
shareAnyone can do better than Dementia Joe. He is a total failure and is ruining America with his gun grabbing policies.
shareWhy are Biden's gun grabbing policies bad, but you approve of Trump's anti-gun agenda?
shareJoe wants to abolish the 2nd Amendment.
shareNo kidding. So did Trump with his "take the guns 1st " nonsense. Why do you keep on giving Trump a pass?
shareWhat guns did Trump want to take?
shareTrump wanted to take any gun from any person who was imagined to be a threat to anyone.
The way the usual red flag laws work is that if a person feels someone else is a threat to themselves or others, they go to the police or the court to file an emergency protection order. If a judge signs off on it, then the guns can be confiscated. This is what VP Pence wanted to see happen.
But Trump insisted that the guns be taken prior to any due process. He never explain how this would work. It seems that he wanted to just legalize firearm theft and let the victims try to get their guns back later.
Perhaps you can explain how this kind of action is pro-gun or protects our 2nd Amendment rights? I've been trying to pry an answer out of you on this for years, but you pretend to just not understand anything about gun control laws. You can't be that stupid, right?
Red flag laws are passed by the States not the Gov. They are designed to take away guns from those who want to inflict harm on others.
If you are against it that means you want mentally ill people to have guns and kill other innocent people.
The NRA supports Trump by the way just in case you forgot.
Your failed fake president Joe is the one that wants to abolish the 2nd Amendment.
Trump was pushing for Congress to pass red flag laws without due process.
How do you determine who should not be allowed to own guns without due process?
I am against taking away a person's civil rights without due process. But it seems that you believe civil right are over-rated.
The NRA is not really interested in protecting our civil rights either.
"What if Biden was spouting this crap?"
He doesn't need to spout it since it is still in effect.
Which part did you not understand about “regardless of POTUS/Administration the DS/DNC is in control”, and therefore it would still be imposed regardless?
It has been 2+ years into the Biden-Administration and the “Red Flag Laws” are still in effect, so whether it was Obama or Hillary, or any Republican POTUS/Admin they still would have proposed/imposed it.
Oh, btw there are at least three methods that could determine that a person may be a threat to themselves or others that may fall under a 'red flag law'.
-A person can have multiple police complaints, and/or several arrests without necessarily having a conviction.
-A person can also have mental/psychological issues and still own a firearm unless the person is involuntarily committed to a mental hospital, or if a court or government body declares the person mentally incompetent.
-A person can have multiple restraining orders filed against them due to aggression/violence.
I was asking if you would approve of Biden saying he wanted to confiscate guns without due process. Would you approve or not?
All red flag laws that are in effect have due process associated with them. There are no "Trump style" red flag laws without due process.
Which red flag laws are you talking about? Do any of them allow the confiscation of guns without due process, like Trump wanted?
All of those methods are a form of due process. How do you think a "take the guns 1st red flag law" would work?
You are been contradicting. If all those methods are a form of due process than why are you complaining?
The methods I mentioned are only a few examples that DJT was referring to, and you are complaining because he was not specific in the details about the ‘who/how/when’ this would work, you said so in a previous statement when you asked how this would work and I explained it.
This is the 2nd time that you have misinterpreted something and blown it out of proportion.
BTW, Biden doesn’t want to temporarily confiscate firearms from those deemed dangerous as per my examples; he wants to permanently ban them in general. He almost always mentions wanting to ban them. This has been a DS/DNC goal for decades.
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20230306/guess-what-biden-wants-to-ban-guns
https://www.heritage.org/firearms/heritage-explains/bidens-gun-control-agenda
I'm complaining because Trump pushed for red flag laws without due process. Surely you understood what he meant by "take the guns 1st, due process 2nd"?
Do you really trust the government to give you due process only after violating your civil rights? What would you do if someone you did not know just showed up at your house and took your guns then told you to wait for your due process? Would you think you civil rights were being violated.
So do you think a red flag law that did not provide for due process would be constitutional at all? Why is Trump the only one proposing something this stupid?
You don't need to show me anything that says Biden wants to take our guns. I and everyone else already know he wants to do this.
Once again; you misinterpreted just like you did last time.
Only an imbecile and an idiot would consider a person ‘deemed dangerous’ because of how they look, or their appearance, or what they are wearing, or some other irrational nonsense.
I did not say I would use that criteria. You're evading direct answers to my questions.
What criteria would you use to determine if a person is dangerous without any due process? Should anyone take your word for it that they are?
If you go to the courts or the police to complain, then this is a form of due process.
You implied it as result of your misinterpretation and lack of common sense which includes: (some other irrational nonsense).
I already provided at least three of them. You are going in circles….again.
I chasing you in a circle trying to get you to buck up the courage to supply a direct answer to my questions.
shareI already have, but like last time, you want others to humor your foolishness.
Try using some common sense and things will become clearer.
Dr. Andersen: “I do not.”
Chairman Comer: “Do you have any experience in the Foreign Service or diplomatic corps?”
Dr. Andersen: “I do not.”
Chairman Comer: “Okay. Thank you. You were the one with the preferred political narrative. You said it right there. This preference was reiterated by Dr. Collins, saying that the lab leak theory would, quote, do great potential harm to science and international harmony.”
Classified report with early support for lab leak theory reemerges as focal point for lawmakers digging into Covid-19 origins
https://www.cnn.com/2021/06/07/politics/covid-lab-leak-theory-classified-report/index.html
In the aftermath of this weekend’s mass shootings that killed at least 31 people, attention turned to what could be done to prevent something like this from happening again.
Among the solutions floated by President Donald Trump: red flag gun laws.
He didnt have much choice really. I assume you support mass murder by the mentally ill?
Thats not up to me to figure out.
If you are against it then you are for mass murder. See above.
Yes they are.
I am not against red flag laws; I have never said I was. I have repeatedly said I am against Trump's proposed red flag laws that do not have any due process.
shareDid Trump ever pass a red flag law without due process?
shareNo. But Trump said he wanted it passed, just like Biden wants to grab guns.
Are you now going to claim that President Biden is not anti-gun because all he has been able to grab is forced reset triggers?
Are you going to claim that Obama was pro-gun because all of his major planned gun grabs and restrictions failed?
So basically wanting and doing is the same thing now?
Biden wants to abolish the 2nd Amendment, by your logic he has already done it.
No one cares about triggers except for you.
Obama was anti-gun just like all democrats. He wanted to grab our guns and put all Republicans in his gulag.
But by your logic, failing to accomplish a gun grab means they are not anti-gun? Like Trump?
Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Obama, Trump and Biden are all anti-gun due to their desire to violate our civil rights to keep and bear arms.
But you and others like you, think it is okay when Trump proposes to or succeeds in grabbing guns.
Derp.
shareSo dangerous individuals such as the mentally ill and criminals should be allowed to go on a shooting spree first “while they go through due process” and then take the guns away from them afterwards?
shareIf they are already judged to be a criminal or mentally ill, then they cannot legally possess a firearm. So if they have a gun, it can be taken away immediately, then they can be put into prison. Of course this does not really apply so much to the wealthy junkies like Hunter Biden.
But if a person does not have a criminal record, then how do you fairly determine if they're a threat without any due process? Even going to the police to complain about someone is a form of due process.
It is a well known trope that a person who carries a gun legally near a school or other soft target area is not breaking the law until they open fire or otherwise threaten anyone with their gun. Where do you draw the line?
Should a member of this forum be allowed to track you down and take any firearms you might own because they think you are a threat, even though you have never (as far as I know) threatened anyone here? Of course not. But that is what Trump wants. Take the guns 1st, due process 2nd.
Where did he request that guns be taken away from those that do not have a criminal record or a history of mental illness or not known to be a threat?
There are people who are known to be a threat to themselves and to others regardless of whether or not they have a criminal record or history of mental illness. Those he referred to as “potentially dangerous individuals with weapons”.
If I was a known threat to myself and/or others, than why should I expect or demand due process first? Besides, the removal is only temporary. Do you have any idea how lengthy the process is for the court to complete the ‘due process procedure’?
I don’t see what the issue is considering that the establishment has made it almost impossible for law-abiding citizens the right of armed self-defense without risking indictment/imprisonment after an incident.
Keep in mind that regardless of POTUS/Administration, it is the DS/DNC that has been in control for decades and they are the ones that would see all guns banned or made unusable.
Every time there is an incident, they are the ones that exploit it in order to push some changes/alterations to gun control, meaning that the ‘red flag laws’ would be proposed/imposed regardless of Administration…see below.
‘Red Flags’ laws were proposed in the wake of the three mass shootings in Gilroy, Calif. - August 2019
https://www.thoughtco.com/us-gun-control-timeline-3963620
On C-Span. Take the guns 1st. https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4716578/user-clip-guns-first-due-process
You tell me what Trump means when he says "I like to take the guns first". How are you not aware of this video clip? It has been all over the internet for the last 5 years. I post it often here.
Do you understand that you have a civil right to possess a firearm? Years ago the Supreme Court defined that right as an individual right, and not a collective one.
After the next school shooting, would you favor the police going around to every house near the school and just confiscating all of the guns? How else are they going to take the guns 1st, and use due process 2nd?
Would it be okay for the police to just show up at your house some day and tell you that they are here to take your guns now and you can try to get due process later?
Exactly how do you determine that a person is a threat without any due process? Sounds like you would fold like a lawn chair if Biden said so. I would not, neither should you.
lmao, once again, you failed to understand anything due to your lack of common sense and TDS.
It is obvious that for years, you have been using this ‘gun grab BS’ as an excuse for your deranged obsession. You should seriously consider getting some mental health care.
It is no surprise that no one else bothers providing imbeciles like you with any explanations since it is futile.
So take the guns 1st, due process 2nd makes sense to you? What if Biden was spouting this crap? Is this the pro-gun attitude that you want in our politicians?
sharecomeback NoW
shareTrump will be back soon unless he loses by chicanery.
shareTrump will steamroll the shit out of Nicki Haley on Super Tuesday and in honor of this, I post this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZOTtHA7NkA
I laugh so hard at this..
MAGA MANIA!
I cant wait.
There is nothing better than a comeback.
shareWhat comeback? Most Americans dislike Trump, the MAGA party is dead and the GOP wants nothing to do with him. Trump will never be president again.
shareYou seem confused.
So what will it take for you and your kind to see things clearly?!
Perhaps when the nukes start flying?! Or perhaps when your ass is screaming in hell.
🤴
shareYou do know that 78 people and 78% are not the same thing, right? (Maybe math wasn't your best subject!)
shareThis isnt a Diaper Joe rally. Over 15,000 showed up in Waco.
shareUm, 15,000 is 0.005% in the US Population (not 78%), but nice try.
Biden didn't have large numbers at rallys because he and his voters are more intelligent and compassionate and didn't want to be super spreaders of Covid 19.
There's also these things called tv and the internet where you can listen to speeches without being present.
They showed up, but they didn't stick around for very long!
"According to the Tribune-Herald's report, police stated there were no problems with protesters or violent incidents and that campaign estimates of 15,000 attending sounded about right.
However, the report notes that even after having to stand in long lines for hours to get in, the crowd grew perceptibly smaller not long after the rally started."
'According to the Tribune-Herald's Mike Copeland, "Trump arrived shortly before 6 p.m., his plane circling the airport as attendees intently looked to the heavens. He wrapped up at 7:32 in the evening, though quite a few fans did not last that long."
"About 30 minutes into the rally, the crowd began to thin, with people getting a head start on the walk back to the parking lots, designated and otherwise," he wrote.'
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-waco-2659656624/
So, when is the last time Joe had a rally with 15,000?
shareWho cares? He got more votes and he's your POTUS!
shareIllegal votes by mules. I just hope the 2024 election is fair.
shareWell, when your guy doesn't win, rather than just admit it, by all means, make things up.
The 2020 election was fair, and Trump lost.
It worked for Nancy.
Nancy Pelosi
@SpeakerPelosi
Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to #ProtectOurDemocracy & #FollowTheFacts.
11:44 AM · May 16, 2017
This reply to the Pelosi tweet kinda says it all:
"This tweet was about Russia interfering. DT claims Dems cheated. Completely different. Also, the former was true. The latter is babyback crybaby nonsense. DT lost two popular votes. The majority never wanted him. Never will."
Sorry Bubba, you're wrong yet again...
Why did Obama let Russia interfere in the 2016 election?
WASHINGTON/GRAND JUNCTION, Colo. (Reuters) - U.S. President Barack Obama lacerated Donald Trump on Tuesday over his repeated assertions that the Nov. 8 election is rigged against him, telling the Republican presidential candidate to “stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.”
He responded with a blistering attack on the Republican candidate, noting that U.S. elections are run and monitored by local officials, who may well be appointed by Republican governors of states, and saying that cases of significant voter fraud were not to be found in American elections.
Obama said there was “no serious” person who would suggest it was possible to rig American elections, adding, “I’d invite Mr. Trump to stop whining and go try to make his case to get votes.”
Obama was right. Trump won fair and square in 2016.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUzGMFFifN4&ab_channel=%F0%9F%8C%BAAMAZINGNATURE21%F0%9F%8C%BA
shareThat was the mule that stole the election.
sharehe already prophesized he was the chosen one,
to lead us out of this hell we're in with the cryptkeeper and gangbang kamala currently in charge,
we had to live through these horrific 4 years to truly appreciate what Trump will give us in 2024