This film describes how running for office was a STUNT or a SCAM that was pulled as a way to GET A RAISE:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FiiygzGY6SI
The plan was NEVER to WIN the election, but to only FORCE the NETWORK that he worked for to give him a BIGGER PAY RAISE than someone else was getting.
Why is it you can't confine your politics to the politics board as our Moderator3 has instructed?
shareCORRECTION:
THIS TOPIC isn't ABOUT POLITICS.
On the CONTRARY …
IT'S ABOUT the PERSONALITY and the CHARACTER of the PERSON that this BOARD is about.
Which also means YOU are the ONE who is OFF TOPIC,
because this TOPIC is for a DISCUSSION ABOUT A FILM,
which the MODERATOR also has explained is permitted here,
which you can also see from part of the other discussion that took place here:
Here's what the COMMUNITY GUIDLINES has to say:
Community Standards:
[b]MovieChat was born out of a desire to encourage free speech and open discussion[/quote]
**************
And The MODERATOR also describes what is acceptable here and says this board is:
*****************
QUOTE:
[quote]
[b]intended for discussions about him as they relate to his activity in movies and TV.
Since MOVIES are often ABOUT POLITICS ..
such as HBO doing the DOCUMENTARY called GAME CHANGE …
which was about SARAH PALIN …
one also CANNOT DISCUSS that FILM without the mention of POLITICS.
In other words, POLITICS and FILMS and other TV SHOWS are so INTERELATED that it's almost IMPOSSIBLE to SEPARATE them from one another.
Same situation with the SEPARATION of CHURCH and STATE.
Since the CHURCH is so INVOLVED in POLITICS NOW, it's also nearly IMPOSSIBLE to KEEP those 2 ISSUES SEPARATE as well.
In other words, what you're really saying is YOU ONLY WANT PEOPLE to TALK ABOUT WHAT YOU WANT THEM TO TALK ABOUT (which is also an infringement upon one's FREE SPEECH which is also a POLITICAL MATTER as well).
END QUOTE
****************************
"FOR DISCUSSION about him AS THEY RELATE to his ACTIVITY in MOVIES and TV" means that it's PERFECTLY OK for us to DISCUSS a FILM like this.
So unless YOU actually have something else to say ABOUT THIS FILM …
you should STOP TROLLING TOPICS,
TAKE YOUR OWN ADVICE
and CONFINE YOUR OWN COMMENTS to another BOARD or TOPIC.
Because they are also NOT WELCOME on wanted HERE on this TOPIC.
Its a movie with Trump in it - Deal
shareIt's more than just a MOVIE with HIM IN IT …
It's a FILM that EXPOSES how his RUNNING for OFFICE was just a STUNT he pulled as a way to GET A RAISE from the NETWORK he worked for at the time.
In other words, he was doing the SAME kind of SLEAZY thing that he use to do back when he use to call NEWSPAPERS and MAGAZINES and PRETEND to be someone else who was telling them who he was DATING as a way to try to get them to PRINT a STORY ABOUT HIM.
Because that's what kind of a DESPERATE ATTENTION WHORE he is, that he had to PRETEND to be SOMEONE ELSE when he TELEPHONED them hoping they'd PRINT something ABOUT HIM.
Because the NARCISSISTIC MAN CHILD is also NEVER HAPPY unless he's in the LIMELIGHT and has PEOPLE PAYING some kind of ATTENTION to him.
Q is trying to suggest that your post doesn't belong here because its too political and should only be posted on the politics board. He's on a mission to suck up to the mods as much as possible to hide the fact he was the one flooding the boards with nonsense and also to hide it was the ackbars bumping his posts to push the relevant topics to page 2. The behavior of the ackbars and Qberto are what have drawn the mods to this board. So now he's gotta play nice.
But since you're talking about a movie with Trump in it there is nothing Q can say about it.
Yes the TROLLS who've been the WORST OFFENDERS here are now PRETENDING as if they're concerned about BREAKING the RULES that they've been breaking here all along.[/b]
Like having lots of SOCK ACCOUNTS, and POSTING at least 10 or more TOPICS on PAGE 1.
And they also BUMPED UP my OLDER TOPICS to HIDE my NEWER ONES, which also made it look as if I'd done the same thing they'd done when I had not.
And they're also constantly calling others names, and saying other RUDE things to them, etc.
[b]As for the CORRUPT CHARACTER of the POTUS (who is also fond of NAME CALLING):
The FILM also reveals how the SCAM MAN who also ran the FAKE UNIVERSITY and the FAKE CHARITY never really gave a DAMN about the COUNTRY (which is also proven by the way he DODGED the DRAFT with the FAKE CLAIM that he had BONE SPRUS that NEVER EXISTED).
Because All he really cared about was MAKING MORE MONEY than the other PERSON on the other TV SHOW who got a BIGGER PAY RAISE than he did.
And now ALL of us have to SUFFER from his INCOMPETENCE because of his GREED and his NEED to MAKE MORE than someone else was making in the ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY.
That’s exactly what he’s doing. Great post!!
shareI'll see any film that Michael Moore makes. I don't always 100% agree with him, but I believe his heart is in the right place. Unlike most Republicans, who consider having a heart to be a non-essential component for doing business.
I hope Donald's grand scheme from 2016 pays off for him bigtime in 2021...when he's finally indicted for all his past and present crimes.
btw, you owned that psycho Queerto with your responses!
By his GRAND SCHEME do you mean his DESIRE to get A BIGGER PAY RAISE than the other person on the other TV SHOW???
I hear PRISON doesn't PAY Very WELL at all. Definitely MUCH LESS than he was making before. :)
The one thing in the film I disagree with is where MM makes it seem as if BERNIE was ROBBED by HILLARY getting the VOTES from the state of West Va.
But BERNIE isn't even a DEMOCRAT. He's a member of the INDEPENDENT party. And he's also a big part of the reason why HILLARY isn't sitting in the OVAL OFFICE now (because those who supported BERNIE got pissed and didn't vote for HILLARY).
And MOORE also makes it sound like MORE PEOPLE DON'T VOTE than do VOTE when he calls those who DON'T VOTE the LARGEST POLITCAL PARTY. But the TRUTH is MORE people do still vote than DON'T VOTE.
As for OWNING the TROLL, what was DONE was CORRECT the FALSE ACCUSATION they were FLINGING at me (where they also try to PRETEND as if I'M the BREAKING the RULES that they CONSTANTLY keep BREAKING).
In other words, it was to DEFEND oneself against the FAKE CLAIM they made where they try to accuse one of not obeying the MODERATOR's rules.
So the REPLY they were given was also for THE MODERATOR as well, so they'd also be AWARE of how the FALSE ACCUSATION that was FLUNG at me had NO VALDITY or MERIT.
You’ve handled it well.
shareThanks DD. You've also handled the TROLLS WELL as well.
Have you seen the newest THREAT he's issued today to remove MILLIONS of MIGRANTS???
This is the way he chose to officially announce the start of his next campaign, by once again making a RACIST remark in hopes that doing so will endear him once again to his CULT following.
There's also another topic called CAMP AMERICA where you can see a VIDEO of KIDS inside of CAGES who represent some of the other kids that have been taken away from their PARENTS and placed there.
How nice it will be to see KARMA come KNOCKING on his DOOR one day soon and then watch him being placed inside of one himself !!!
This MALIGNANT NARCISSIST has no EMPATHY or COMPASSION WHATSOEVER for anyone else but HIMSELF.
Do you think he'd also try to do a REALITY TV SHOW from PRISON ONCE they LOCK HIM UP???
Also Hope they place him into a CAGE or inside a JAIL CELL with that RUSSIAN BEAR for his CELLMATE … the one that we saw on top of him on that PARADE FLOAT!!! :)
"a way to GET A RAISE from the NETWORK"
then why is he giving his yearly presidential salary to charity.... every year!
According to this FACT CHECK SITE he has NOT been GIVING it to CHARITY:
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/08/false-stories-revive-claim-about-trump-salary-donation/
QUOTE:
Trump’s first donation — of $78,333 — in 2017, to the National Park Service, did go toward a pair of projects at the Antietam National Battlefield — which houses the Antietam National Cemetery. But the Interior Department said the money, along with other funds, would be used to “restore the historic Newcomer House on the Antietam battlefield, and will underwrite the replacement of 5,000 linear feet of deteriorated rail fencing along the Hagerstown Turnpike.”[/b]
END QUOTE
What he's been doing is HANDING IT OVER to other GOVERNMENT AGENCIES that as you can see don't USE IT for CHARITABLE PURPOSES.
So IRONICALLY, it's going to things like the replacement of INFRASTRUCTURE, which he also refused to REPLACE due to the way CONGRESS REFUSED to FUND the BORDER WALL that he wanted.
T-rump and his spawn claim they 'give to charity' - yet there's never ever any proof they do so. Even on his TV show he claimed he would 'donate' to different charities, yet those charities he named never received a dime.
shareHe also had that other FAKE TELEVISED FUND RAISER where he claimed to raise 6 MILLION in one night for VETS.
Trump Fundraiser Screws Vets Out Of Millions As His Rich …
https://www.politicususa.com/2016/05/20/trump-fundraisers-screws-vets-millions-rich-friends-welch-donations.html
Donald Trump's veterans fundraiser scam has gotten worse as Trump's rich friends have welched on a promise to donate millions to veterans groups. …
One night in January, Donald Trump skipped a GOP debate and instead held his own televised fundraiser for veterans. At the end of the night, Trump proclaimed it a huge success:
It was all a scam. Trump and his pals promised vets money, and they never delivered. Trump also promised that all of the donations would go to veterans groups when the truth was that the donations went to Donald Trump’s foundation.
If Donald Trump is as wealthy as he claims to be, why didn’t he just write a check to the vets? Trump claims to care about veterans, but he is going to go back on a promise to them.
If Donald Trump is willing to lie and cheat those who have risked their lives for this country. Imagine what President Trump would do the rest of the country.
And now we don't have to IMAGINE what he'd do because we already KNOW WHAT HE'S DONE to RUIN IT.
And we also know that several months later there was NO PROOF that any MONEY had been donated to the VETS, and it was the PRESS who finally FORCED HIM into paying them something.
Wasn't The reason why he had that FUND RAISER also because he was PISSED about the way the DEBATE had been set up, so the FAKE FUND RAISER that he had for the VETS was a way to try and DIVERT ATTENTION AWAY from the DEBATE???
What was it he got UPSET ABOUT??? Was it the way they'd put a TIME LIMIT on the LENGTH of the replies so that he couldn't FILIBUSTER the DEBATE the way he was previously doing before???
So he got UPSET about the TIME LIMIT, refused to DEBATE, and had the FAKE FUND RAISER that he NEVER PLANNED on using the MONEY FROM to PAY the VETS anything???
And only PAID them something once the PRESS kept PESTERING HIM until he had NO OTHER CHOICE???
His CHARACTER is so REPREHENSIBLE that one will NEVER UNDERSTAND the reason why others find him to be so APPEALING to them.
Thats the beauty of being a messenger for the alt-right. It doesn't matter if you lack the facts to support what you say. Your audience will eat it up regardless.
shareIf he says so
share