MovieChat Forums > Donald Trump Discussion > "Plaid shirt guy" removed from T-rump's ...

"Plaid shirt guy" removed from T-rump's camera shot for 'being honest' at Montana rally


Tyler Linfesty, a Billings West High School senior, has become a social media sensation after being removed from a 'T-rump' camera shot at the T-rump rally Thursday night in Montana. His transgression? Not being 'enthused' enough, and giving 'honest facial expressions'.

Linfesty, who was standing just over Trump's right shoulder in the camera shot, was making faces and mouthing responses as T-rump spoke at the podium. Viewers caught on and quickly dubbed him 'the plaid shirt guy'. After about an hour, he was removed from the position and replaced by a young female who cheered like a high school cheerleader behind T-rump.

Linfest explained what happened on a CNN interview this weekend.

"I just wanted to go, just see the President and hear what he had to say. I mean, I'm not going to pass up the opportunity to see the President of the United States," he told Don Lemon on Friday evening. "I was not trying to protest," he said, explaining those were his honest reactions to the President's speech.

"When I got back there, I knew that I was going to be genuine. I was going to give my actual reaction to the things he said. So whenever I disagree with him, you could tell that I disagreed. But whenever I agreed with him, you know, I clapped," Linfesty explained.

At one point, viewers can see him mouth the question "Have you?" in response to T-rump's claim that he has "gotten a lot of support" in the wake of the anonymous New York Times op-ed author and the writer's claim of a "resistance" within the White House administration.

"Before the rally, they told us that, you know, you have to be enthusiastic and be clapping and cheering for Donald Trump. And I wasn't doing that because I wasn't enthusiastic and I wasn't happy with what he was saying," Linfesty admitted.

An hour into the interview, a young woman came up to him and told him she would take his place behind the President, which she did - and cheered and smiled enthusiastically.

"The woman she came in, and she just said, 'I'm going to replace you.' And I just walked off. I knew I was getting kicked off for not being enthusiastic enough so I decided not to fight it," Linfesty said.

Linfesty claims he was then escorted to a room where he was detained for ten minutes, as they checked out his ID. He was then escorted out of the rally by Secret Service agents, and he's not sure why. No one gave him an explanation as to why he was forced to leave.

Before the rally, he was given a "Make America Great Again" red hat by organizers and told to wear it at the rally. Instead, he opted for a "Democratic Socialists of America" pin. As he explained, he was being his 'honest' self.

Unfortunately, being honest doesn't go far in the GOP.



reply

[deleted]

LOL!

reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFnF3jAvpTw

Should provide sources/video as well for context.

Guy was just making facial expressions on the reaction of what Trump says. He was not there to protest, disrupt, or yell and agrees with some of the stuff Trump says and disagrees with others. As moderate as can be imo yet was removed because he wasn't wearing a MAGA hat or something. They later replaced him and his friends with people wearing Trump hats or the like. Sounds like a fake group of people setup to me.

Public rallies where all participants had a right to assemble peaceably and express their right to free speech (though he wasn't being disruptive in any way and just listening).

reply

People giving honest reactions to Trump is fake. People giving ginned up, sycophantic support is real.
Makes sense don't it?

reply

Two years later, still feelin' the Bern.

reply

Good for you ! So sad he couldn't have built a larger following. Just throw out certain buzzwords (Socialism ! Oh it's a big word that means only one thing = Communism !) and the alt-wrong goes ballistic. And unfortunately, I mean literally.

reply

No trumpsters in this thread eh?

reply

no, just the berniacs

reply

And if someone had stood right behind Obama or Hillary at a nationally televised rally and made faces and mouthed sarcastic responses, no doubt they would have been allowed to remain and continue to mock them for the duration of the broadcast.

reply

Well that never happened, did it? Not once. Ever.

Too bad T-rump can’t do the same thing because he’s an embarrassment to this country.

reply

Or perhaps it's because Republicans just don't bother to pull foolish stunts like infiltrating opponents' rallies and making faces on camera.

reply

This was a high school kid who wanted to see the president speak. Get your facts strait.

reply

A high school kid who is a member of The Democratic Socialists of America political organization and attended the rally wearing a pin of that organization. Anyone can make an ingenuous excuse for their behavior.

reply

Your characterization of 'infiltrating an opponents rally' is just wrong seeing how he is openly cheering for the parts of Trump's speech he supported. Nor did he ever try to deceive or hide his politics. You're falsely ascribing subversion to a kid barely old enough to vote.

reply

And you're willfully ignoring the ramifications of a self-described socialist attending a Republican rally.

reply

And what 'ramification' is that? It's still a free country, what's your point?

reply

My point is, it's obvious that the kid went there with the express intention of making his little scene and getting recognition for it, and that anyone at any rally of any political party who did that would get the exact same treatment he did. Actually, no... At some Leftist rallies, a Conservative who stood behind the speaker and made funny mocking faces on national TV probably would have been taken out and beaten by goons instead of just politely told he was leaving.

reply

If any goonery is involved, be sure it's because the republicans began the practice. Not once has this country advanced under republican anti-American "values." Always the party of discrimination and strong-arm tactics.

reply

Well, I guess it's too bad the whole country can't "advance" like Chicago and Detroit have under decades of "all-American" Democrat "values".

reply

Except if you're a journalist attending a T-rump rally. Then you're taken out and beaten by goons just for covering the event.

reply

Sources? I googled that and I can only find articles about journalists being beaten in countries with Leftist leadership.

reply

Those are other countries, not the USA. And there are plenty of Western Europe countries that are Left leaning, and the goons are the ones on the right, the anti-immigrant crowd.

reply

What about the goons among those 'immigrants' who view Western societies as a sexual buffet where they can rape women at will because they think the women are 'asking for it' due to dress or behavior?

reply

What about your hyper imaginative portrayal of immigrants? Any real experience working with them? Or is this just something you've been told to think?

reply

Unlike you, apparently, I am aware of news stories beyond Leftist attempts to slander President Trump. You should read a little more beyond your customary diet of "(Fill in Liberal Celebrity) Slams Trump on Twitter and Breaks the Internet!".

reply

If you choose to follow alt-wrong news sites, that's your prerogative.
I don't slavishly follow any news source, I just hear what's being reported in that awful, horrible MSM. Y'know, the orgs that have nothing to gain by attacking a "good person" like ass-jack Trump. So I'm not actively seeking out reasons to think this Creep isn't anything other than a Creep.
There is no agenda. He's burning down his own house, and the rest of us are remarking on it. That there is a segment of people who enjoy this debacle, I don't know what to say.
But yes, i DO know what to say -- it's disgusting.

reply

I feel bad for you.

reply

Well, thanks for that. I feel bad for me, too. Watching this country burn under this idiot's watch is not fun, empowering people's worst instincts is not fun, I can tell you that.

reply

America is getting greater and greater everyday.

reply

"My point is, it's obvious that the kid went there with the express intention of making his little scene and getting recognition for it,"

If that was your point, then your point is obviously wrong. You should take more time to think about whether your logic even makes any sense before trying to argue a failed point. How could he possibly know that he'd be placed directly behind the president? The fact is there's no way he could have possibly predicted the organizers would place him directly behind the president, especially in light of his adorning a democratic socialist pin and not wearing a MAGA hat as instructed.

That destroys your entire point that he ever went there 'with the express intention of making his little scene'. Like I said, you're falsely ascribing subversion to a kid barely old enough to vote. He made his intentions very clear in his CNN interview.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFnF3jAvpTw

reply

He was probably thinking he had gotten really lucky when they put him front and center. The failed point is yours, eyeDEF. It's obvious to anyone that a Socialist did not go to a Trump rally with aboveboard intentions.

reply

Your original claim the "the kid went there with the express intention of making his little scene and getting recognition for it" and what you're saying now "he was probably thinking he had gotten really lucky when they put him front and center" are at direct odds with one another. Anyone with a brain can easily recognize this. Apparently you don't, so you don't.

You fail on your very own logic.

reply

Typical nitpicking.

He wanted to do SOMETHING disruptive and he hit the motherlode when he wound up behind President Trump. He likely felt that his mere presence there was a protest.

reply

What you're doing is your typical projection of what you wish to be true with no evidence to back up your claim.

Like I said, if he were there to protest he wouldn't have bothered cheering when Trump said things he supported. But you conveniently ignore this fact because it doesn't fit your fantasy narrative.

Just like you ignore the indisputable logic that he could not possibly have gone there with "the express intent of of making his little scene and getting recognition for it" when there's no way he could possibly know he'd be placed behind the president.

You have no understanding of basic logic which renders your narrative absurd.

reply

What's REALLY absurd is your obsession with this.

reply

It's not absurd to note the entire premise of your argument (premeditation) is based on a logical fallacy.

reply

I'm sorry. It's just that you come across like a rabid fanatic. This isn't just posting idle messages to kill time for you. It's your life's work, I guess.

reply

lulz. You're taking yourself far too seriously to think the act of pointing out your argument is flawed is my 'life's work'. 😂

reply

So you say... And your use of an emoji MUST mean it's true.

reply

This. (Referring to what eyedef wrote)

reply

Yeah that kid was a regular mastermind of chaos. Jesus give me a break. If they only want Trump enthusiasts in camera view, they should've just placed the people that showed up in full MAGA gear in those spots. The organizers fucked up and the kid was just reacting how he felt Trump's comments deserved to be reacted to (he clapped for him a couple times when Trump said something he agreed with). And if that kid was trying to undermine the event and Trump's people were outsmarted by a 17 year old, then he needs smarter people.

reply

So what you're saying is that when he arrived at the event, the organizers were at fault for letting him in with his DSA pin on, and letting him stand behind T-rump?

reply

They were obviously not expecting anyone to pull that kind of crass stunt, but they should have been more observant. I mean, if persons on the Left will save bottles of their own bodily waste to throw on people they disagree with, tactics like crashing a rally should be taken as a given.

reply

"They were obviously not expecting anyone to pull that kind of crass stunt,"

Then, like the President himself, his event organizers are complete failures. Doesn't surprise me in the least.

reply

Why didn't they remove the supporter behind T-rump's shoulder on the viewer's right? The girl wiping snot from her nose with the American Flag?

reply

I will admit that I would not be happy about someone being on camera and being disrespectful toward a representative I like.
But it's the republicans who have set the tone, so if people choose to be disrespectful toward DJT, he and his party have earned it. repubs have lost the high ground and only choose to fight in the gutter.

reply

Orange Julius Caesar is literally one barely-restrained step away from ordering "insolant ones" to be publicly shot. Hell, I'll bet most of his supporters would be in full support of it.

reply