https://www.amazon.com/Russia-Hoax-Illicit-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0062872745
Has anyone read this yet? Should be interesting to read how the FBI tried to frame Trump.
The people behind the investigation of Russian collusion are republicans. You only assume Trump is being framed because deep down you know many of those same republicans tried to frame Hillary for Benghazi. They investigated her to hurt her chances to win the presidency in 2016. You somehow want that to mean they tried to prevent Trump from winning in 2016, but there's no scenario that gets you there. They began investigating Trump's campaign because the evidence was so overwhelming that the Bureau would crumble if they didn't look into it. They literally had no choice but to investigate.
shareWhy do people keep pointing out that investigators are Republican? John McCain is republican. It means nothing. He used that dossier created by a foreign British spy. Republican politicians want Hillary and Middle East wars as much as Democrats. Republicans didn't try to frame Hillary. They tried to signal to voters that they were tough on Hillary because their constituents don't like her. But they weren't really. FBI Comey is Republican also and he went out of his way to protect Hillary by calling her private server "extremely careless" instead of "grossly negligent".
There is no evidence against Russia or even a motive. That is why you persist is asking us to trust the word of people who lied about WMDs in Iraq. I laugh when you tell me to trust them because they are Republican. Trump has exposed your one party state.
Republican politicians want Hillary and Middle East wars as much as Democrats.
That investigation "did not establish that members ofthe Trump Campaign
conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf
Facts matter.
shareMueller is going where the evidence takes him. He's got a pile of indictments so far. will it lead to Trump?
Time will tell.
no, none of it did. Hillary was fined by the SEC for lying about the steele dossier...
shareSo, this is your M.O. now, going around commenting on ancient threads? That would be pathetic, even if the user you're replying to was still here!
sharethis hasnt aged very well. lolz
shareAs it's still very much your M.O.(with three comments on ancient threads just today) I'd say it has aged quite well indeed!
shareDouble standards and projections by Democrats:
24 minutes of Democrats denying election results.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zHraZecxDkc
https://video.twimg.com/amplify_video/1626656515850440737/vid/1280x720/YcGZJbK0HZ15S7ti.mp4?tag=16
Over 150 examples of democrats denying election results:
https://gop.com/research/over-150-examples-of-democrats-denying-election-results-rsr/
=====================================================================
https://pastes.io/tjr1spbwiz
I guess that means that dems are election deniers right?
shareNo, it means that you keep Trump's face trending by constantly posting meaningless comments on old threads!
sharelol, and ironically, you reply to them...Trump lives in your head...all day...every day.
You have been Trumpatized 🤪😁
Trump is by far the most popular person on MC. thats why everyone loves talking about him...
shareOh, I almost forgot:
Members of the Democratic Party admit how Biden and his minions rig the elections against each other like they did when Hillary was elected nominee. Apparently; they are at it again.
It is ironic how they casually and indirectly imply/suggest ahead of time what their intentions are or will be.
Similar to how they did with the pipelines before they sabotaged them…lol
https://pastes.io/cziatlbuta
just saw this, amazing research. Too bad this couldnt be a sticky.
shareJarrett is a Fox News talking head, now.
Jarrett has been criticized for letting his political beliefs color his legal commentary, sometimes changing his mind on legal issue based on which political figure would be affected. On August 3, 2017, Jarrett called for a grand jury for Hillary Clinton over her email controversy.[7] A day later, when a grand jury was impaneled by special counsel Robert Mueller in the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections, Jarrett said that grand juries were an "undemocratic farce".share
Jarrett was arrested Wednesday May 21, 2014 in the afternoon at Northern Lights Grill in Terminal One of the Minneapolis-St.Paul Airport, according to Metropolitan Airports Commission spokesman Patrick Hogan. Airport police, who were called to the bar, reported that Jarrett seemed intoxicated, acted belligerently and refused to follow their orders. Jarrett was booked into Hennepin County Jail and charged with interfering with a police officer.[16] Jarrett pleaded guilty in July 2014 to disorderly conduct charges in connection with the arrest. CNN reported that Jarrett's arrest occurred right after Jarret had checked out of a rehab facility.
shareNearly 4000 posts and you still don't know how to make a link clickable. Typical Trump neanderthal.
shareHe just doesn't bother putting in any extra effort because he doesn't care. It's all a game to him, he doesn't believe what he posts.
shareActually I don't know how to do that either....sorry to inform you that it's not limited to Trump supporters. Care to give a brief tutorial?
share[ url ] linktextgoeshere.com [ /url ]
No spaces anywhere.
Thanks man!
shareI just tried and still screwed it up, I am the worst lol
shareWhen you click on the reply tab, at the bottom left hand corner, you will see a “formatting help” option. It mentions that you will need the http(s):// in the url, in order for it to render as a hyperlink, so maybe that’s what went wrong.
share[deleted]
Thanks wanton! It's possible that went wrong or the other possibility is I screw up everything I touch....who's to say what it was haha
shareYes, take note, as per the post below mine. Initially I didn't include the http(s) and edited that in after you replied to me, but you'll need that as well.
shareAh, I see why -- Without the http, it sends you directly to Moviechat. I tested it with just words, because I have accidentally used url instead of quote before, and ended up with blue clickable text. I corrected it of course.
shareYou have to type out or cut and paste this text to make a link clickable. Ignore the dash next to the U, just did that so you can see the link.
[-url]https://moviechat.org[/url]
https://moviechat.org
https://www.amazon.com/Russia-Hoax-Illicit-Hillary-Clinton/dp/0062872745
Unfortunately the owner of this site hasn't figured out how to make it easier like it was on IMDb.
Thank you, I will try again soon!
shareI know how to do it, its just a pain in the butt. If you are using Chrome all you have to do is highlight the link and hit go to.
shareThat investigation "did not establish that members ofthe Trump Campaign
conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities."
https://www.justice.gov/storage/durhamreport.pdf
Did you want someone to read this to you? Is that why you’re asking?
share"...Ex-Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort admits sharing info with Russians"
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/paul-manafort-russia-polling-data-b2140727.html
Some key takeaways from Mueller’s findings:
NO COLLUSION BETWEEN THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA
Mueller made that clear.
Barr quotes Mueller’s confidential report as saying the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its election interference activities.”
That finding was a win for Trump, who has turned “no collusion” into a daily refrain.
https://apnews.com/article/north-america-donald-trump-ap-top-news-elections-politics-3053d226815e4c8d905322ea1d8cd1a1
no collusion was found.
shareStill at it, I see!
[–] JoWilli (10409) 10 months ago
no, none of it did. Hillary was fined by the SEC for lying about the steele dossier...
reply share ignore report
[–] SamNoyoun (3065) 10 months ago
So, this is your M.O. now, going around commenting on ancient threads? That would be pathetic, even if the user you're replying to was still here!
reply edit delete share
[–] JoWilli (10408) 3 months ago
this hasnt aged very well. lolz
reply share ignore report
[–] SamNoyoun (3064) 3 months ago
As it's still very much your M.O.(with three comments on ancient threads just today) I'd say it has aged quite well indeed!
reply edit delete share
[–] JoWilli (10408) 3 months ago
I guess that means that dems are election deniers right?
reply share ignore report
[–] SamNoyoun (3064) 3 months ago
No, it means that you keep Trump's face trending by constantly posting meaningless comments on old threads!
reply edit delete share
What's worse is how many idiots out there still believe this BS lie.
share