More to the point (or lack of one in his case) - why did the director of 'Kinsey' film him gallivanting around with his winkle out!? That was just bizarrely cruel why they'd do that to him! Surely the director could see it looked like an acorn and you'd think any decent person would've then spared Peter the embarrassment of filming it full-frontal.
It's almost as bad as that Chinky chap's teeny-weeny penis in 'The Hangover'!
o=3 (Actual size)
Woah, you really don't like Peter's cock. It's possible his dick is tiny but it's also possible you have no idea how big it is. You've for sure heard of showers vs growers. Some guys don't grow much but some do. You may not have seen many cocks grow but if you had you'd know that some tiny guys will have you running for cover once the rooster is out. You don't really know what he's capable of and judging a flaccid dick means nothing.
shareChinky chap??
shareNot to mention, he's a very attractive and talented actor, who has babies with a very attractive, accomplished actress. His penis obviously works. Who cares. It doesn't even matter at his level.
shareBut it works
http://www.auplod.com/u/dalpuo430da.png
He's a grower, not a shower.😉
shareIt was actually Sarsgaard's decision to drop trou.
shareHis cock looked incredibly normal to me. You do realize the average male is only about 5 inches erect, right?
shareOh come on, you know that it looked smaller than average, even while flaccid.
share