Transgender ideology has no scientific support.
There's no such a thing as transgender ideology. No more than cisgender ideology, or heterosexual ideology, or diabetes ideology, or hair loss ideology. Transgender people have different positions, like anybody else. Go figure.
And ideologies have no scientific support. That's why they're called ideologies. There's something weird with transphobes and their obsession with words like Science or Biology. Quoting a famous swordsman: they keep using that word. I do not think it means what they think it means.
you are right - if my daughter grows up thinking about wanting to change "gender", I will have done something wrong
Except I added "because she thinks it's cool
". You can't tell apart between actual gender dysphoria and some eventual trans trend.
And that's what ultimately boosts that trend. People like you are so busy teaching their kids that gender dysphoria is just some psychological fancy that when they grow and have some psychological fancy, they call it dysphoria and think they're trans. Quite the irony.
What do you mean "there's no such thing"? Aren't there transgender people, who change "gender" according to what their mind decides? This is an ideology, obviously.
Diabetes? Hair loss?
How can this be comparable? Those are scientific things, that can be scientifically proven...
On the gender thing, as many transgender people claim, "only a woman knows what a woman is" (lol)
You are comparing things that have no comparison. You are comparing science with personal belief/creed.
These are facts, sorry.
Aren't there transgender people, who change "gender" according to what their mind decides? This is an ideology, obviously.
You're like those woke trans for who everything is a gender. In your case, everything is an ideology 😂
How can this be comparable? Those are scientific things, that can be scientifically proven. You are comparing science with personal belief/creed.
Three "science" in a row. Congrats! 😂.
Congrats for the lack of arguments, I guess we know what that means.
There was nothing to argue. You literally said that a medical treatment is an ideology, and then you said "science" several times in a row, because if you can't tell apart between chemotherapy and anarcho-liberalism, saying "science!!" sure fixes it 🤣
Removing your boobs is as much a "medical treatment" in this case as adding silicon to them...
But you are right, it is a in a way a "treatment" to a mental disorder (not officially called this anymore because people were getting depressed and ostracized - but it still is in practical terms).
Once again you are placing scientifically proven methods and diseases (chemotherapy and cancer) next to things that are personal internal beliefs. You are incapable of comparing cells that can be observed in a lab, with an ideology and internal creed that can only be experienced by each individual - and in many many cases such "disease" and "diagnostic" is admitted, by the own individual, to not be real years later.
I understand facts are hard to argue against, but those emojis are just sad if that's what you consider arguments...