Libertarians trying to rewrite historian

wait so you cant be a libertarian because you post about history mostly... This doesn't make any sense

Would you like the quotes of him admitting hs a libertarian?

You could have taken two more seconds to find all his politics videos. including the one I literally posted the link for...

Cool story. if he claims it it must be true! Ill post more links since you are ignorant.

he has said

- "teachers, fireman and police are leaches because they steal tax payer money, it should be all be voluntarily and privately funded"

This one was in response to me saying that "markets need states because they provide a framework such as police and judges to defend and make rulings on private property, trade, contracts etc"

""let's assume that a free market can only work with State control. This means we're no longer able to talk to each other, since the State has not sanctioned our conversation (state control of the means of production - we are producing words). The fact that we're able to talk without some commissar giving us permission to do so, is a testament to the fact that humans act on their own free will without the need for guidance from some central organized society - the State. Similarly, property is myself, whatever I own, the money in my pocket etc. I don't need a State to sanction that I have things. I have things because I create or trade with other individuals for things. Don't need a State for that. You list a corporation or a court doing things, and then proceed to call them 'private'. Private means 'individual', while hierarchies of society (nations, unions, syndicates, corporations, States, governments etc) are 'public' "

please stop talking about things you clearly dont have any knowledge on

Heres more gems from the historian who def doesn't talk about politics and isnt a libertarian

"And yes, I would say that, since Marx was anti-Semitic, and that Marxism is inherently anti-Semitic, that Marxist websites are anti-Semitic. All you have to do is replace the words "bourgeoisie" and "capitalist" with "Jew" and you'll see the REAL nature of what Marxist Socialism preaches.Society = State. The State is anti-Semitic. An individual may or may not be anti-Semitic, but the State/Society is. And why is the Society anti-Semitic? Well, a Society defends itself from anti-Society/anti-Socialist elements, which, according to Karl Marx himself - "We discern in Judaism… a universal antisocial element of the present time.” - Marx, On the Jewish Question. So Karl Marx is saying that the Jews are anti-Socialist. He's saying that Jews cannot be a part of a Socialist Society - the State."

""Democracy is People Power. Except the People are the Public and the Public is the State. So Democracy is State Power. North Korea is a Democracy, because the State is in power. "

This ones in response to me posting a video about the company and family behind the current drug epidemic. and how the government literally would not regulate it or would not step in to stop these companies legally paying off doctors to push their drugs (iwhich in tiks opinion of them stepping in would be"more socialism") and instead let the free market take its course.

"Billionaires "legally" pushing drugs on people is the problem of Socialism. Free individuals (capitalists) would be able to say "no" to the drugs. But "legally" (State control, Socialism) forces these slaves into doing what Socialism wants. Yet, somehow, this isn't seen as a problem of State Power, but as a problem of the individuals who don't want to take these drugs? Thus, the Socialist calls for more State control, which will result in more drugs coming your way. If only the market (the individuals) could decide what to do with their own bodies."


As you can see even corporations are "socialism" according to him.

is a government "collectivist"?

is the fact people cooperate in any situation, whether its in the framework of a state, a corporation, two people planning a party. are all these "collectivist, syndicalist or public and therefore "socialist"?

this is absurd. But its what the author of the video Tik does.

he actually thinks that if he redefines terms based on their 2000 year old latin safe he can just define everything as "socialism"

Tik is an extremist libertarian. even by libertarian standards hes extreme.

umm what...

Id say it's more based on "all men are only selfish and not cooperative at all".

While communism ignores humans greedy selfish side, libertarianism does the opposite and ignores our social and cooperative one.

while communism claims all capitalism and corporations and trade for profits is bad, again libertarianism does the opposite and claims all government and social programs are bad and corrupt.

Communists claim the capitalist steal time and value through labor, while libertarians claim the government does this.