MovieChat Forums > Jake Gyllenhaal Discussion > Gyllenhaal not a leading man lacks chemi...

Gyllenhaal not a leading man lacks chemistry with Women due to being gay


I think Jake Gyllenhaal should stick to what he is doing do independent or dramatic driven films to show his talent. BUT when Gyllenhaal has TRIED to branch out doing the franchise or superhero kind of movies he falls flat. Jake is a character actor he just doesn't have the charisma or heterosexual appeal to be a franchise star. I am sure MOST people on this board know Gyllenhaal is gay and I think the audience can sense it. I've seen Jake's films like Love and Other Drugs with Anne Hathaway they had no chemistry and the film was a box office disappointment. I think the real reason Jake is not a leading man he just does NOT have SEXUAL CHEMISTRY WITH WOMEN. Jake BEST film to date is still the gay drama Brokeback Mountain he was believable playing a gay man BECAUSE HE IS GAY. Jake was more comfortable working with Heath Ledger in a gay film role. I am guessing Gyllenhaal agents or PR people are telling him he has to stay closeted because that would be best for his career. But I think there comes a point where Jake has to stop hiding. He is better doing smaller films and a supporting role in a major motion picture. He will be happier with himself and his career when he comes out of the closet.

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

lol! You both sound like you're in jr high! And what's with capitalizing "women"?

suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply

uh huh As Metallica says nothing else matters!

suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply

lol! You sound like you're in junior high!

suzycreamcheese RIP Heath Ledger 1979-2008

reply