MovieChat Forums > Ashton Kutcher Discussion > Too old for 'No Strings Attached'?

Too old for 'No Strings Attached'?

posted 13 years ago by shellsmachine
9 replies | jump to latest

I think the sex-buddy story should be 20-somethings' territory. Ashton Kutcher looks too old for believability in the role, just on this side of "ew creepy", and though Natalie Portman is the right age I really thought she was above this kind of junk. Shows what I know. XD

[–] n/a

This message has been deleted by an administrator

[–] babz12 13 years ago

Ha ha! What's wrong with you? Portman's just about 30 and Kutcher is just over 30, and they both look fine. Lots of rom coms are with people in their 20s and 30s. Not a big deal. And I think Portman just wants to try out all sorts of different roles and genres.

[–] rick525-1 13 years ago

What are you talking about, Portman will be 30 in 4 months and Kutcher is in his early 30's.....ewwwww VERY CREEPY.

[–] speedolitec 13 years ago

Is this yet another example that the majority of imdb posters are pre-puberty?

[–] purplebear17 13 years ago

I agree.

[–] hirdler27 13 years ago

Totally agree too! This movie was great, and they both had great chemistry!!! Nothing wrong with their ages or the movie.

[–] Joel_S 13 years ago

The OP must be 12 to think Ashton Kutcher is too old for this role. Portman and Kutcher are in the same age range. I could see it if they were 50 but 30s? Come on. The women on Sex and the City play these roles into their 40s.

[–] speedolitec 13 years ago

Hell, I'm around the same age as Ashton, and I have more of a libido now than I did when I was 15!