do you think he did molest little boys?
maybe?
shareI know one thing. If you or I had sleepovers with 12 year old boys we would probably be in prison. It's just not appropriate.
shareThat’s exactly right.
share
MovieChat Forums > Michael Jackson Discussion > do you think he did molest little boys?
No, because all of his accusers have credibility issues. All went to a civil lawyer requesting money rather than the police first. What does that tell you?
The 1993 case was a successful extortion with the civil settlement which opened up Pandora's box to allow future "victims" to claim abuse and attempt extortion. After the Chandlers got the money from the civil settlement, the criminal case was dropped and 2 grand juries refused to indict due to LACK OF EVIDENCE. Again, what does that tell you?
There's a reason he was acquitted on all 14 charges in the 2005 trial because the Arvizo family had a shady history of attempted celebrity extortion amongst other things. Hell, Janet Arvizo (accuser's mother) went to the same lawyer in the 1993 case who procured the settlement hoping she too would get rich like the Chandlers. But what the Arvizos failed to realize was that the law changed in California this time around, so that they had to go through the criminal trial FIRST and have the defendant found guilty. Only then can they have a civil trial and be rewarded monetary damages. So, when MJ was found not guilty, the Arvizos couldn't get the civil monetary settlement that they had hoped for. Tough luck for them.
The Chandlers simply took advantage of an unfair law back then in the early 90's.
^And all of that merely scratches the surface of the glaring glaring credibility issues of the each of the accusers/accusations.
shareThe accusers settled. Meaning, they were willing to put a price on their children in order to extort a celebrity.
If my child was truly molested, there's no settling with $$....that motherfucker burns. Don't care who they are.
Yep. Not to mention, Evan Chandler (1993 accuser's father) was on tape saying that "If I go through with this, I WIN BIG TIME. I will get everything I want." Odd statement for a father whose son was supposedly molested. Audio clip of this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tx8Z9fxxw-U
shareOr drugging his own son Jordan Chandler with Sodium Amytal to coerce/brainwash him into changing his story. Yes, that actually happened. Sounds like something a psycho abusive dad would do which it's no surprise why Jordan later filed a restraining order against him for being abusive and violent.
shareYep. He was a dentist and had access to the drug. The guy was nuts. He assaulted his own son, Jordan, with a barbell weight and mace. Such a loving father. There's a reason why nobody attended Evan's funeral. He was disliked by everyone.
Also, the fact that Jordan got the genital description wrong when he said MJ was circumsized, yet his autopsy confirmed he wasn't. If the drawings were a match, MJ would have been arrested.
There's a reason why Sneddon attempted to enter the Chandler drawings a mere DAYS before the 2005 trial ended. Because he was desperate and knew he was losing his case, so he sought to enter the drawings as evidence in a last ditch effort. If the drawings really were a match, he would've introduced it at the beginning of the trial.
Yes. I've thought so since the late 1980s.
shareWhy? No evidence has ever surfaced.
shareRumor, innuendo, misinformation "gut feelings", his being "weird" in general all take precedent over any actual incriminating facts. You know the usual. It's just not possible for some people to comprehend that someone could like to hang out with children sometimes without there being a sexual element. It doesn't matter if the mundane and innocent context of these hangouts and sleepovers were spelled out by credible character witnesses like Macaulay Culkin and various others, some people are dead set on projecting their own perverted thoughts onto the situation. The horribly biased media that has had a witch hunt against MJ for decades factors in as well.
sharePeople do suck. The media sucks the most...nothing but lies.
shareBecause all his relationships with women seemed fake, staged, weird, and unbelievable... and he kept bringing little boys to public events instead of women. Or adult men. It took me a while to figure out that the little boys were his dates, but eventually the penny dropped.
And to those who are whining about evidence: FYI personal opinions are not held to the same standard of proof as jury trials. Get used to that idea, because that's how the real world works.
A grown man having sleepovers with pre pubescent boys is red flag city
shareI don't believe he molested anyone.
shareWell, they did find fairly normal porn on his computer, nothing close to underage. I think the real criminal was Michael Jackson's douchebag father. Look how all Joe Jackson's kids turned out, only Janet is remotely the normal one..the rest are complete and utter screwups.
shareI've never heard of them finding any type of porn (both legal or illegal) on computers. They found adult heterosexual porn magazines like Barely Nude, Penthouse, etc which actually works towards MJ's favour as being a heterosexual male.
shareOops, looks like I was wrong and they found a lot of horrible porn that Michael Jackson had in his possession!
https://www.mjfacts.com/michael-jacksons-full-porn-collection-analyzed/
those guys sound like such liars, pretending they are soooo good
"totally demeaning to women"
(yeah, and probably jerked off to it after their weird meeting, whatever the fuck this was to be transcribed)
what in god's name is that odd collection of words?
No doubt about it at this point.
share