MovieChat Forums > Michael Jackson Discussion > Michael Jackson innocent or not??

Michael Jackson innocent or not??


How do we know FOR SURE that Robson Wade &
James Safechuck are telling the truth about
their abuse claims by Michael?

In 2013, these abuse claims Wade & Safechuck
are now making, were rejected & dismissed by
a Law Court in Los Angeles, and their case
was closed.

Also, the FBI investigated Michael Jackson
for 10 years and found nothing.

So what are now the motives of Wade & Safechuck
in this TV documentary? Are they telling the truth
about Michael? Or is this all about money?

Is this a planned conspiracy and extortion attempt,
on their part, to destroy Michael's reputation and
then claim a huge cash payout from Michael's estate?

The only way we will ever know FOR SURE if Robson Wade
James & Safechuck are telling the truth is to:

MAKE THEM TAKE A LIE DETECTOR TEST
AND A POLYGRAPH TEST!

We will then see in a clear light, how truthful
they really are!

reply

You make good points but there's a reason why the results of lie detector tests aren't admitted in court - they aren't reliable.

reply

I'm 50/50 on this. The documentary didn't change anything. Most likely we'll never know the truth.

reply

If he was innocent can u imagine how MJ must've felt?! those kids and their parents lying about him in the most damaging way imaginable. he must've been absofukinglutly furious! like looney tunes furious .

Of course if he was guilty.. well he must've been absolutely s***ing himself at being caught/found guilty!

reply

Another thing you gotta ask if why..if he was innocent..why the hell would he pay off the first kid to the tune of 20 MILLION DOLLARS! (which would be like 35m today).. I mean why would he ever do that?! In the doc one of the mothers says she asked him why he did it and he told her it was cheaper to do that than go to trial.. and that satisfied her it was just about the money .. but if he was innocent surely hed be outraged and be like 'after everything I did for you?! i gonna sue your ass off the f**kin planet you little mofo! I don't care how much it costs as otherwise everyone gonna be thinking I did do it!!' he wouldn't pay him off like that would he? anyway it would open the floodgates to allow any kid hed spent time with to want to be paid off.. and that's what happened 10years later (unless payoffs were actually happening on the quiet? Million here million there)

reply

MJ is compulsively non confrontational to the point of it being a sickness. He'll run away from you if you even politely disagree. No way was the man going to puff his chest and confront the allegations in a log court battle, especially with the risk of his genitals being aired in public. It's more in his character to sweep it under the rug and never hear from it again. And 25 mill is peanuts to him. He can make that back in a few hours.

reply

Ok that makes sense too. Damn each way has convincing arguments!

reply

Michael Jackson never paid a dime of his money to anyone.. The insurance company who insured his tours did.. They figured that it would be best to pay out the money in hopes that it would go away and wouldn't wind up costing him hundreds of millions in ticket sales. Michael Jackson never wanted to pay a dime. He instead wanted to take the Chandler's to court over this.

reply

[deleted]

The man is dead, leave it alone.

reply

That means you have to leave it alone with all deceased pedophiles or sociopaths.

reply

You can't prosecute them if they are dead, right? If they are still alive, like Kevin Spacey, their careers are over. I don't know if Spacey was ever prosecuted.

reply

Whether you can prosecute or not, you are allowed to still discuss them--which is what you really meant by "leave it alone"

Now that you mention it, this has nothing to do with Kevin Spacey. Spacey doesn't deserve to be "prosecuted" for (gasp) touching a man in a gay bar while the man tapes it in order to extort from him. By all means, his career being over should please those who love to watch others become undeservedly ruined in life.

reply

Theres an old scientific saying: "Absence of proof is not proof of absence".

So I'm fully aware that we'll never be able to say exactly what Jackson did with any particular little boy at any given moment, as the only witnesses to possible crimes are dead or were children at the time.

But I still wouldnt let a child near Jackson, or near anyone with his habits. You may need proof beyond a reasonable doubt to convict someone in a court of law, but to protect a child what you need is to have a fucking clue about how pedophiles present. IMHO that is how the average person needs to think anout pedophilia, the only time thinking like a juror is appropriate is when you're actually on a jury.

reply

Hear, hear! 👏🏻

reply

I've seen all the info while arguing this case back and forth on IMDb for years. MJ fans are like the crazy Trump fans and crazy Trump haters -- they're willing to hound people, throw dead pets on their yards, send death threats, the works. If these two spoke up to get attention, they'd be crazy, since everyone knows -- and they in particular know -- what MJ's diehard fans will do to people. The first kid who spoke up and received a pay off had to run to Europe to get away from the crazies.

Would it be worth it if it wasn't true? No.

Just because MJ dodged going to prison doesn't mean he's innocent. Innocent people don't get accused of child molesting, pay off the accusers, then keep having the "special friends" around. That speaks of compulsive behavior of the type one sees in child molesters. In the end, yes, he finally gave up the "special friends" -- so far as we know -- I think because people did a severe intervention on him and convinced him that next time he likely wouldn't be so lucky. If he still wanted a career or a positive legacy, he was going to have to quit with the "special friends" -- and bribing the parents with outlandish gifts so they'd keep pimping out their kids.

All the arguments of innocence fall flat except ONE: The FBI investigated him for ten years and found no evidence of child molestation. Not that the FBI couldn't make mistakes. Looking back, they shouldn't have allowed 9/11 to happen, as many red flags as went up. So even that argument doesn't prove anything.

None of his fans can do a good job of explaining away the pay-offs, the compulsion, and even the stuff he's copped to, like giving wine to kids and calling it "Jesus Juice." Clearly not a nice man that we want children to be around. Add the pay offs to that and the compulsive need to have his "special friends," and you've got what walks, acts, and sounds like a child molester.

reply

As I understand it, the FBI didn't investigate him, let alone for 10 years. It's that they assisted in the investigations, with things the local law enforcement hadn't the resources to or couldn't do themselves.

I'm on board with everything else you said 👍

reply

Ah. Thanks for the input. Another MJ legend bites the dust.

reply

Yep. It's like the "They're suing for a billion dollars!" thing. My money is on that rumour being floated by the Jackson family and/or the attorney and/or PR machine to attempt to discredit Wade and James, knowing many people are all too willing to write off victims as being gold diggers when it involves a big, well-liked celebrity.

reply

I just got molested by MJ when I looked at his profile pic on MC. I never felt so violated in my life.

reply

I don't believe Michael was guilty of any of the accusations.

reply

Nope, not innocent!

reply

Not.

reply