what if...


hes innocent..?

reply

If he's innocent, his accusers are reprehensible people. Sociopaths.

What if he's guilty?

reply

if hes guilty and we're at war,.. god help us all

reply

Innocent as he was proven in a court of law & a secret 10 year long FBI investigation. A very simple question & one which too few are really considering how truly reprehensible if not downright evil it makes this entire witch hunt along with those supporting it.

reply

He was not "proven innocent" in a court of law. He was acquitted with reasonable doubt. Don't make it sound like he was Proven Innocent. He wasn't.

reply

But as widespread as the supposed abuse took place was, shouldn't they have found something? Anecdotes make for heartbreaking television but it's not quite the same thing as hard evidence.

reply

It was enough for Rolf Harris, bill Cosby, the Hey Dad guy here in AU's, cardinal pell and many sex offenders, victims testimony's were what proved the crime.

reply

Zero evidence against him. Not guilty. Add to that a secret 10 year long FBI investigation finding nothing against him. The evidence pointing towards his innocence was thoroughly proven.

But of course that's not enough to satisfy those demanding countinous, absolute difinitive proof of a negative to such an biased & irrational degree, ignoring that in society the burden of proof is on the accuser(s) not the accused.

reply

He's not innocent, you gullible twit!

reply

So what? It's good music.

reply