I wonder what happened to her after the Dr. Phil interview?

Yes....it's somewhat of a gray area. As history runs along and times change, thoughts on what is and is not professional evolve.

For instance, there was a HUGE outcry in 1991 when the definitive biography of Pulitzer Prize winning poet Anne Sexton was published, with the cooperation of her surviving daughter (and literary executrix). Sexton was bipolar, and had been in and out of therapy and mental institutions her whole life, and her doctor (with her knowledge) would tape record their therapy sessions. The tapes were found in Sexton's files after her suicide, and used as background research for the book, and occasionally quoted in it.

Obviously a million thorny issues presented themselves along with this...but with an eye to the Greater Good (which is of course interpreted differently by everyone), it was the right thing to do in this particular case. Sexton's poetry had always been autobiographical and confessional, and her daughter felt the late Sexton would have wanted the tapes to be used when examining her life (and work).

This is the New York Times review of the book, which mentions the controversy: http://www.nytimes.com/1991/08/18/books/the-death-is-not-the-life.html?pagewanted=all

This is their article about the use of the tapes, before the book was released: http://www.nytimes.com/1991/07/15/books/poet-told-all-therapist-provides-the-record.html?pagewanted=all

I'm less familiar with this 2012 development - - but I guess the tapes are now the basis of their own book (AN ACCIDENT OF HOPE) which is discussed in depth HERE: http://www.apadivisions.org/division-39/publications/reviews/anne-sexton-therapy.aspx
.


.

Plaintivemelody- Don't feel bad because you missed Annie Hall! But I highly recommend it.

As for Dr. Phil, well I would say he is motivated by money, that's not unethical in itself.

His guests have serious issues but they are still AWARE that they are on TV. For whatever reason, they want to air their family problems for everyone to see. Maybe not the wisest thing, but they are at least complicit in their own exploitation.

There is a difference though between psychology and psychiatry. I saw an interview that Bob Newhart gave. He said he wanted his character, Bob Hartley, to be a psychologist ( what Dr. Phil is) and not a psychiatrist.

He explained that his character could deal with all sorts of quirky behaviors, anxiety, and personality problems. But he couldn't take a lighthearted sitcom approach if he played a psychiatrist who was dealing with much more serious mental issues.

Psychiatrists treat much more serious disorders like schizophrenia which can't be handled with talk therapy. I don't think Dr. Phil is qualified to deal with an illness like Shelley Duvall's. She clearly needed a medical doctor, not an interview!