Is he innocent?


What do you think? Framed or guilty?

reply

Guilty.

Although...it's enough.

The man is fucking 83 and there will be no comeback for him ever.

reply

And will die anyway. No need for a death sentence, though, dying naturally would be an EASY way out..:)

reply

He was charged, went to trial, and was convicted by a jury of his peers.

reply

I'm pretty sure he's guilty, remember he admitted to illegally drugging young women in that unsealed deposition from 2005. So, at the absolute minimum Bill Cosby cheats on his wife, illegally plies young women with drugs, and has sex with them. More than this, I've read where women talk about their experiences, where Bill Cosby drugged them without their knowledge, they talked about how helpless they felt when they realized what he did. The drugs were so powerful they couldn't run, fight, or resist in any way. Bill Cosby sexually assaulted them against their will and then disposed of them like trash.

Is it possible one or two of them are lying? Sure. Is it possible that 30,40, or 50 are all lying? It's somewhat possible but extremely unlikely!

reply

It is notable too that he was convicted.
It it had been more likely that he was innocent than guilty, the man would not be in prison now.

reply

This is exactly the way I look at it as well. If you get thrown in prison you almost certainly are guilty..sadly the justice system rarely wins but I call Bill Cosby in prison A HUGE WIN for justice!

reply

It it had been more likely that he was innocent than guilty, the man would not be in prison now.

He was judged in the media, which wanted him down for political reasons. When the power wants you in jail, being innocent or guilty is what matters the less. Judges are quite docile when media applies enough pressure.

reply

I'm pretty sure he's guilty, remember he admitted to illegally drugging young women in that unsealed deposition from 2005.

That's a mainstream media lie.

He answered "yes" to a question where he was answered whether he gave drugs to the female accuser. The way the lawyer made the question, using the verb "to give", it covers both consensual and non-consensual options. The media, of course, said that he admitted to drug her, which is not true.

reply

I agree with Kukuxu. This statement has always been misconstrued by the media. If I remember correctly, the actual drug discussed in that deposition was Quaaludes. It was a big drug in the 60s-80s or so and everyone in Hollywood was taking them. Woman wanted them and did what they needed to do to get them. I don't recall Cosby admitting to forcefully giving them but he did obtain them for the purpose of giving them to woman for sex....which is what was done.

I never believed these woman were drugged but wanted to be drugged because that was the times; it was the party scene. I know that sounds horrible, especially coming from a younger white female myself. I always thought that by using this against Cosby was a slippery slope because of everyone else from that time period that could now be accused of sexual assault for the same thing. The Beatles, The stones, Jack Nickolson, Hell, even the Monkees! Any celebrity who took drugs and offered them to their girlfriends or any groupie wanting to be close to these people.

reply

Of course the shitty thing is there is not doubt about Polanski drugging and then raping a 13 year old girl since he entered a guilty plea... but he will never do any time in prison. I would much rather see Polanski in prison than Cosby... with Cosby it was adults that most likely took the drug of their own freewill. It boggles the mind.

reply

You would make a terrible lawyer.

reply

The terrible lawyers were the ones Cosby had. Hell any halfway decent lawyer would have coached him before he gave a deposition for the civil trial. That deposition is what put the nail in his coffin.

reply

Have you heard these women’s stories or do you just automatically discount them all? These women didn’t want to be drugged and most of them had no idea that he was drugging them. He put it in their drink, no matter what that drink was, he put it in cappuccino and orange juice for fux sake. Many of these women were young and naive, trusting and starstruck. They knew that they wouldn’t be believed and get a lot of hate and personal humiliation for coming forward.

reply

These same women who rode the #MeToo wave for anyone who even remotely looked their way that they could misconstrue as visual rape? Women who are recounting tales from 30, 40, and 50 years ago based on what the media wanted them to say for -- as mentioned above -- political purposes?

If we're going by "women's stories" then Joe Biden should be in jail, too, but he's not. Conveniently, the only people who end up in jail in Hollywood based on "women's stories" are those being taught a lesson, sort of like when Martha Stewart was jailed for "insider trading", even though Wall Street louses trade inside all the time and get away with it like a dandelion floret riding away on the wind into the horizon during a breezy spring evening.

reply

"women's stories"

GO FUCK YOURSELF.🙂

reply

Oh Martha was fucked even more than you suggest because she wasn't even convicted of insider trading those charges didn't stick, but because they were already out to get her they went back and found inconsistencies in her testimony and went after her for that... which is a reason no one should ever talk to the police whether you are innocent or not, the odds of you being able to repeat the same thing verbatim multiple times months apart is close to zero and if your stories don't match up perfectly the Feds will use it to claim you lied and fuck you. Though normally being such nice folks they don't do it unless their original case falls apart then they have to save face so they look for a inconsistency in your testimony.

reply

Thanks for that extra bit of info. I was hazy on the details but that makes it even worse, or rather, further highlights the points others are making in the thread about the media putting a target on someone's back and authorities finding reasons to persecute them.

What's so hilarious is that those exact same tactics is what was used against Jesus Christ, and that account is thousands of years old. You would think that by now people would see that story and go "Let's not use the clownery of public opinion as the court of law in which to judge someone" and yet, here we are... thousands of years later repeating history as if it never happened.

reply

That Martha Stewart targeting was always puzzling. I think she and bubba got it on and kankles found out.

reply

Possible. God knows Bill would fuck anything with a hole in it.

reply

He's at most guilty of having extra-marital affairs. If that's a crime, then US prisons would always be full!

reply

WOW

reply

Wow indeed.

reply

He never got in trouble until he told young blacks to "pullup your pants"

reply

You mean he would have gotten away with it if he hadn't said that.

reply

He dare suggest black folk take some responsibility for their current situation as a community.

The first rule of the Democrat media/party plantation: you don’t tell black folk how to get off the plantation.

The 2nd rule of the Democrat media/party plantation: you don’t tell black folk how to get off the plantation.

reply

I can't understand why he did what he did... the man is worth over 400 million dollars could have hired the most beautiful escorts in the world, etc... he did not just want to be with the women, he wanted to violate them-have-power over someone defenseless, against their will, etc difficult to understand

reply

Yes. Cosby was good-looking (when younger), famous, charming, and extremely wealthy. If sex was his only goal he could have got laid every night, consensually and legally, if he had wanted to.

reply

It's exactly that. Power.

reply

victim of MeToo.

reply