Was she..


Really as good of model as everyone thought she was or was it the boobs that helped?

Just want to hear opinions.

reply

Personally I think so.

She was just naturally photogenic to start with. She didn't need the makeups or the implants because naturally she had the genes and could sell a pose with ease. Not saying she was foolish to use both she wasn't and that helped make her Anna. But it's a shame we never seen her without either model seriously.

Her biggest fault imo was her lack of much mainstream stuff of note besides Guess. As far as I can find she never really mainstreamed modeled for anyone else besides them and always modeled naked. That was a smart move because she had one of the all time best bods for it but it prevented her from being the best total model she could have been. I could easily see her being with Crawford, and Ireland if she didn't hit the bad path with Stern and the drugs. Who knows maybe she would still be with us if she made that transition.

But on the bright side she left us with a lot of good pictorials and stuff for both fans and future models to look/study at.

reply

I believe she was. I honestly think she's one of the most beautiful of all time.

reply

http://i.imgur.com/a5sQZ25.jpg - Even without the breast she had some pretty striking facial features in her prime. I thought she was a decent supermodel but not on a Heidi Klum, Laetitia Casta, Adriana Lima, Doutzen Kroes type level. She reminded me of Jayne Mansfield a lot.

reply