Revisiting Kurt's Career
For discussion.
Argument:
In terms of universally acclaimed cinema (films that are viewed by critics and the mass public as good, excellent, or seminal), Kurt's career falls considerably below the level of star that many try to put Kurt in the same class as.
This is about objectivity ( as much as is possible in an artistically situated medium), not personal preference; like many stars (particularly one who has been in a number of genre films), Kurt has a fervent fan base. It is the beauty of cinema- one man's favourite film could be another's idea of cinematic torture. But we are throwing out particular taste- this thread is only referring to perception, both critical and the majority public.
The following statement is understood: "who cares what other people think? I think X about Y..."However, such a statement can not be used as a defense against the above argument.
My response :
When examining Kurt's career through the lense of popular and critical acclaim, it has been somewhat of a disappointment ; the high point of his output occurred early in his adult career, and the remainder failed to fulfill on the promise shown in his initial Carpenter collaborations. His work is littered with significantly more misses than hits. Kurt may be a personal favorite, but to put him in the same class as, for instance, Costner or Cruise (not in terms of acting ability, but in terms of career quality), is simply wrong.
Classics: Escape From New York, The Thing
Great: Backdraft, Tombstone, Miracle, Silkwood
Good: Breakdown, Stargate, Grindhouse
After that, his career is very much open to debate in terms of quality. Big Trouble in Little China is a favorite of mine, but is very much is a cult classic, enjoyable for its absurdity, not for it's quality of cinema. His career is, however, full of guilty pleasures. Tango & Cash, aforementioned BTLC, Escape From LA, Captain Ron, Overboard, Soldier.
So, what do you guys think?
http://boxofficemojo.com/people/chart/?id=kurtrussell.htm