Question: In Human History of this Planet

Because nationhood wasn't a thing untill about the middle of the nineteenth century to begin with.

When I look at Canada, Denmark, France, West Germany, Greece, Iceland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States I see first world nations founded by whites.

Japan and South Korea, also first world, founded by Asians.

Absent from first world nation builders are countries inhabited by all blacks.

I fail to see how your response answers my original question.

Ofcourse you fail to see that.

Nationhood is the act of building an independent nation. Nations around the globe were building independently well before the mid-1800s like you said. So please enlighten me further to what you said--your original answer--which wasn't an answer at all that made any sense.

*edit* Let us just say prosperous nations like the ones I mentioned. Disregard the term "first world" and point to me one highly advanced nation like the ones I mentioned that was founded by all blacks.

Thank you

Why do you care other than to point out that you think blacks are inferior? So damn transparent. And you're absolutely incorrect but I'm not wasting time teaching you.

You're not going to waste time teaching me? How condescending of you. Go ahead. Enlighten me. Plus, I never said blacks are inferior. I brought up a question for conversation. But here is some thing to think about. There are parts of the world where blacks are still living primitively, eating albino blacks because they believe it will give them powers, hunting with spears, living in primitive housing. Yet, no where in the world do you see whites living like this, not even Eastern Europe.