MovieChat Forums > Rose McGowan Discussion > Rose McGowan ends her acting career

Rose McGowan ends her acting career


It's always so sad to see things end this way, not on a bang but on a whimper. Whether you like or hate McGowan, believe her or not, sympathize with her or think she's nuts, love her, hate her, care less...it matters not. Rose McGowan effectively ended her own acting career in Hollywood, at least with the major studios. She might still find acting work with cable television and with indie movies.

I'll tell you why and you need to talk to someone over age 50, preferably older to understand Hollywood.

Hollywood is the biggest hypocrite when it comes to women. Hollywood trumpets itself as the bedrock supporter of women's rights, the Democrat Party, the left-wing liberals, any and every liberal or so-called progressive cause. But Hollywood is the first to throw women under the bus.

The older people know all too well over the past 80 years how much Hollywood has exploited women. Hollywood is youth-obsessed and there's little work for older actresses. A number of female actresses back in the 20th century commented about the 'casting couch', which for you young people means that long ago, aspiring young actresses had been importuned to give up 'sexual' favors in order to further their careers. Sexual harassment was a way of life. Women actresses simply endured it as an occupational hazard. But it wasn't just women. Reports surfaced of handsome young male actors being pressured for sexual favors from studio execs or other influential people who were into that kind of thing.

Worse, old Hollywood quickly circled the wagons to protect its own. Whoever this so-called studio bigwig is that allegedly sexually assaulted McGowen, if he is still in good standing with his colleagues and peers, trust me, he will be protected. Old Hollywood was good at blacklisting and blackballing and bad-mouthing actors and actresses who had displeased some studio bigwig. What was greatly feared was to be told, "You'll never work in this town again." because the major studios colluded with each other in blacklisting actors. Careers could be easily ruined and ruined actors and actresses had little recourse but to exit the show biz, take other jobs, leave Los Angeles, or if lucky, marry some rich guy if the ruined actress was still young and pretty enough.

McGowen's time in mainstream Hollywood is over but as I wrote, not all needs to be lost. There's still cable television productions and independent productions and theater she can turn to.

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

This message has been deleted by an administrator

reply

I agree with much of what you say. I think the SJWs and feminazis have gone way overboard the other way. Such as, most of what Rose says these days is utter nonsense and speaking of hypocrisy, I think she is right up there.

Again, nobody condones rape or sexual harassment and certainly not me.

First, if this is true, she is not at the point in her life and career she can be who she claims to be, a big hero to women and start naming names. Her career has been over for years now, and if she was not stupid should have plenty of money for a great life much better than 99% of the people.

And, now in this political climate she can speak out and be believed.

But to me, unless she comes completely clean I have major doubts she is being truthful here.

Just my opinion.....I think she probably went through some weird things in that cult she was raised in and has some mental issues.

But, I think she willingly participated in a lot of games to get ahead in Hollywood. If she is big and bad as she portrays herself, she could have said no.

Then, her infamous "outfit" she wore to that MTV event, her willingly showing her vavoom figure off, and worst fooling with a married Rodriguez shows to me she was as much as part of the problem as she is blaming others.

I am sure more will be coming out, and I hope we find out. I think it's a mixture and nobody is a saint here. I totally believe Hollywood is full of sleazy guys, but I also totally believe women like Rose are just as bad and play the games, too.

reply

You just made me reconsider.

When Rose McGowan claimed she was 'raped' by the alleged Hollywood high-powered exec, I assumed, 'forcible', such as physically overpowering her, drugging her, or threatening her with a weapon.

We all do not know the full story because McGowan hasn't given it and the alleged rapist hasn't come forward with his story.

However, if a woman gives up sex voluntarily even under unsavory conditions for the purpose of personal gain, that is NOT rape. The guy was and is a scuzzball if the story is true but while demanding sex for a favor is unethical, immoral, and in many instances, illegal, it does not follow the definition of rape.

The feminist Nazis want to push the narrative that any unpleasant sex can be considered rape. The femnazis were even trying to push forward a law giving every woman to retroactively change consensual sex to rape if she so desired. Their spurious rationalization is based on shrieking emotion (you pigs!) and the old one, 'It's our bodies.' Sure, your body is your own but you don't have the right or excuse to lie and falsely accuse someone of rape if he did not actually rape you. Back in the late 90s at some college sorority, a girl told her sorority mates about having voluntary sex with a male student. Her sorority friends pressured her and convinced her to change her story to the guy raping her.

Bad sex, unhappy sex, or sex given voluntarily, even though reluctantly, for personal advancement, is not rape.

That said, I and you do not know the full story of McGowen's rape account. She has not filed a police report or brought legal or civil charges. At this point, without physical evidence or witnesses, it would be hard to prove in a court of law unless some slick, *beep* lawyer can deceive a gullible jury into believing anything. There's a reason why there was a statute of limitations on sex crimes. I can feel for the purported victims of Bill Cosby but they did have the right and the chance to bring charges against him when their alleged drugged rapes occurred but they didn't because they feared for their careers so they waited till he was an old man, a has-been, and a Hollywood retiree with no power to affect careers any longer.

reply

Zzzzzzzz

reply

@m_wonderful

I agree with much of what you say. I think the SJWs and feminazis have gone way overboard the other way. Such as, most of what Rose says these days is utter nonsense and speaking of hypocrisy, I think she is right up there.



I'm too through with anybody who would claim that anyone who isn't white or male and protesting against a social wrong is a "SJW" or a "feminazi". "SJW" is just a term right-wingers hijacked, appropriated, and twisted around to discredit anyone who is outspoken about social issues and ills. And an idiot right-wing ex-drug addict talk show host coined that stupid-as-hell term "feminazi" which is even more stupid since feminism and Nazism are nowhere even near the same thing. Tired of hearing that bull**** over and over again. Enough of that s*** already. Also, why are so you so hellbent on dismissing this actress and anything she says? At least read the BUST interview where she explains why she feels the way she feels, after so long in the business. Also, what does her showing her figure off at an MTV event have to do with anything she's saying? What a stupid thing to say. Exactly how does that discredit her very real lived experiences of sexism in the business? And even if she did name some names, unless she pressed charges against the person she alleges to have assaulted her, the statute of limitations has probably run out by now (depending on how long ago the incident happened.) I guess according to you, women should shut up and never talk about their experiences with sexism at all because it's too inconvenient for you to listen to. Or they should never be believed, because they never know what they're talking about, according to you,too. Read the interview and see what she has to say for herself, instead of making suggestions about what you think she might have done---which is only speculation on your part.


reply

@jeffyoung1


The feminist Nazis want to push the narrative that any unpleasant sex can be considered rape. The femnazis were even trying to push forward a law giving every woman to retroactively change consensual sex to rape if she so desired.


There is no such thing as a "feminist nazi"----the two words don't even belong in the same damn sentence with each other. Plus, it's a stupid sexist term anyway. And what proof do you have that feminists were trying to push such a law? Where's your proof? And one antecdotal story about what one college student supposedly did sure as hell dosen't make ALL rape accusations false. Show some links to prove that this supposed law was ever going to pass, or that it ever even existed to begin with. And,yes, there are some women who lie and make false rape accusations, but it sure as hell isn't the majority of accusations. Also, the women who accused Cosby of rape weren't waiting around until he was an old man to make their7 accusations--they finally came out due to the fact that one of his accusers actually filed charges against him in 2005 (the only one that's done so to date) and I also think the Jian Ghomeshi case may have inspired them to all come forth,too.

reply

I'm too through with anybody who would claim that anyone who isn't white or male and protesting against a social wrong is a "SJW" or a "feminazi".

I doubt that. You seem to be quite not through with commenting on my every post. But I am glad. Unlike you, I won't tell you to be quiet because debate is fun.

Tired of hearing that bull**** over and over again. Enough of that s*** alread

"SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi" "SJW" "feminazi"

Also, what does her showing her figure off at an MTV event have to do with anything she's saying? What a stupid thing to say. Exactly how does that discredit her very real lived experiences of sexism in the business?

Sorry, but that will require common sense, and either you are just being argumentive or you lack that.

And even if she did name some names, unless she pressed charges against the person she alleges to have assaulted her, the statute of limitations has probably run out by now (depending on how long ago the incident happened.)

So? What does that matter? You don't think it's important to out whoever this supposed person is? And why does McGowan lecture other women to name names on her Twitter feed?

I might read her Bust interview soon. But I am in no hurry as I've read her nonsense too much already and I see no reason to read any more of her nonsense.

reply