MovieChat Forums > Rob Lowe Discussion > Smart man, he owns Piers Morgan in this ...

Smart man, he owns Piers Morgan in this conversation and he was civil


about it. Unlike Alex Jones who came off as a troll and almost mentally unstable. Don't get me wrong, Alex Jones made some good points but he came off as douche when he was doing it. Also, while I am a conspiracy theorist to some degree like Alex Jones, I would never say the crap he says to people in real life because it would just come off as unstable. Maybe the government does have it's own agenda but there's not enough proof to back that up.

Either way law abiding Citizens should have the right to purchase whatever type of gun they feel they have the most protection from intruders/criminals who may try to break into their house. If they feel safer with a rifle, than they should own one. I do not like to hear about bans on guns, because we are not Germany as of right now. So I don't want to end up like Germany where Jewish people couldn't protect themselves from Hitler's minions.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddratsseodE

reply

To be fair, the right to bear arms was only designed for militias in case they had to rise up against a tyrannical government.

You want a rifle? Join the national guard. You do not need an AR-16 to defend your home,

America needs to get out of this wacky, Wild West, frontier mentality.

Btw, the Germans did have access to guns. But they still lost and were absorbed by the Nazi regime.

Greatest Films Not in the IMDB Top 250http://www.imdb.com/list/bc9x1QAFat0/

reply

Well put, Degree7.

reply

Um no, the second amendment was designed so that law abiding citizens could defend themselves, and resist oppression. The supreme court has ruled in favor of this. Btw, AR-16 was a prototype rifle in the 60's, it was never produced. Might wanna get your facts straight.

On the IMDB message boards you either die a good poster, or live long enough to become the troll.

reply

In United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), the Supreme Court ruled that the amendment "[protects arms that had a] reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia".

Limit of the Willing Suspension of Disbelief: directly proportional to it's awesomeness.

reply