i'm sorry but i think he acted terribly in his sequel movies
i know people say he was terrible in the original trilogy but i liked hims in those.
shareI honestly don't blame him for the bad acting. He would have done a perfectly fine job being Luke again....save for how he was written. I actually read that Mark Hamil objected very loudly to the script about the way Luke was portrayed, and he probably would have quit before filming began, had he not signed a contract first. I seriously think he got shafted by TLJ.
shareyeah it was written for him to growl and act immature and pissy, i bet he probably would have acted better as a suave, wise, grown up hero.
shareHonestly, sometimes it's better to consult actors who know their character really well to write a better story. Neither Abrams, nor Rian could be bothered with that, so that's why we get a shitty script that portrays our favorite characters in a way that is contradictory to how they would have really behaved. They were written by people who didn't care about the franchise, or the characters, and just wanted a quick cash grab.
shareAgree. i even go as far as to costumes and look too...For me, personally, it wasn't Luke Skywalker at ALL. There is this idea in Star Wars that everything has to Rhyme and that Luke has to now portray this 'prequel era' Jedi and that was NEVER Luke to me.
Oh! He has to wear a beard like Obi Wan! Um...no, he doesn't. He looks better clean shaven; that's Luke.
Oh! he has to wear long Jedi robes! Um no....he doesn't...this is now a 50-60year old clothing style; Luke never wore anything like this and it doesn't fit his character.
But I guess that is what the fans expected to see; I just don't agree with it. That was not Luke in those movies and I am sorry for Mark Hamill having to do it.
Are you mixing up acting and script?
The acting looked fine to me, although admittedly im no expert.
are any of us?