MovieChat Forums > David Bowie Discussion > The archetype of “Influencer”

The archetype of “Influencer”


I find that the term “influencer,” as used today to be a coarse triviality, a lightweight pop culture phrase stolen from corporate sales jargon (“Are you pitching this to an Influencer, a Decision Maker or an Owner”?) Having sneered at that, and leaving aside dimwitted corporatespeak, if anyone influenced the pop culture world, it was David Bowie, nee Jones. (Place an accent grave over here the first “s” in “nee.”)

reply

" (Place an accent grave over here the first “s” in “nee.”)"

Huh??

reply

I know, right? Well to start he used the wrong word. Use "née" for women and né for men. It would be Bowie né Jones.

reply

"Use "née" for women and né for men"

I have to admit I did not know that. Thanks.

But I hadn't even got to that bit, I was still scratching my head over the wording.

reply

Yeah. Lol. Née and né are French for "born". And like everything in French there's a masculine and a feminine.

reply

I find that the term “influencer,” as used today to be a coarse triviality, a lightweight pop culture phrase stolen from corporate sales jargon (“Are you pitching this to an Influencer, a Decision Maker or an Owner”?)


Who else is the term influencer used for these days, outside of folks on YouTube?

reply

Satan is a bad influencer.

reply

It’s used by someone who wants you to think s/he knows whereof s/he speaks. We’ve no need to keep trying to invent new words when the vast majority of people do not know the meaning of the words we already have.

Eschew bullshit.

reply

Except that unlike most of today's "influencers", Bowie actually influenced people!

reply