Let me ask you a question... From a pure marketing perspective, why would a studio - who wants to make money - put a female lead in both their flagship and chief auxiliary movies when the core audience of the franchise is overwhelmingly male?
From a traditional POV, that makes little sense,the data says Males prefer Males for action and adventure movies. This is not sexist or misogynistic, its preference that is scientifically established. So why go against the data, the history, and common wisdom?
Well, we have to look at the NFL, and their brilliant marketing team (brilliant from a money making perspective). They figured out that men will maintain a strong brand loyalty (NFL being the brand) despite a perceived drop in the quality of the product. With this knowledge they came up with a plan to keep their core audience while purposefully moving away from them and cater to the fringe of women who could be potential viewers. They adjusted the rules, refocused the marketing to the female market, and although men did not like it, they remained loyal.
This new, now proven marketing strategy became the basis for the casting choices in the new Star Wars films. Cast female leads to attract the small female fringe, while relying on brand loyalty to keep the majority male core audience. That is perceived by some as very underhanded and manipulative. Its a money making loophole that the core audience sees as a betrayal. Taking advantage of someone because they show the admiral quality of loyalty, is usually considered wrong, especially when its just used to make a little extra cash.
So this whole thing about casting female leads is not about freedom for women, its about money. The supposed backlash against women being cast for the leads, is not about women, its a reaction to those who are selling out their favorite franchise for - you guessed it - money.
This marketing scheme of putting in female leads in otherwise male orientated films will continue to be the norm. There are already a few films slated for release this year, that are doing it. For a male its emasculating, for a female its not really empowering either. So it benefits no one but the studio's bottom line. There is no gender equality when you pit one gender against the other. So please understand the truth of what is going on...
reply
share