MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Expose a movie visual effect.

Expose a movie visual effect.


I think this .gif from "Safety Last!" is interesting.

https://giphy.com/gifs/l0Ex0UXWwyfZyu2M8

reply

This video was kinda interesting
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIbbYl77GxM

reply

They CGI'd Superman's cape? Couldn't they just use a fan to give them an accurate effect?

reply

Wouldn't they just distract the actors by asking for selfies and autographs? LOL

reply

I used to be a fan of Superman but now I'm an air conditioner.

reply

Ba Dum Tss

reply

You can have some fun with this: http://instantrimshot.com/

reply

This reminds of a stunt done by Tom Cruise in one of the later Mission Impossibles. I remember they showed him doing it, and said it wasn't special effects. He was actually hanging from the building. I kind of hate Tom Cruise, but I was impressed.

https://youtu.be/kV4f7gnyX3c

reply

I'll ignore your Tom hate because I'm a fan. But that video is one of the reason why I love him. He just wants to entertain.

reply

He's always kind of bugged me, even back to Top Gun, but I cannot argue with his commitment to doing the best work.

reply

This is a side by side look at Clash of the Titans 81 with supposed better effects, I'm not impressed. https://youtu.be/itYdtKY-9w4

reply

Wow, it looks so much worse. The movement looks too unnatural.

reply

Agreed...I thought about trying to watch the remake again today...I have such a love for this movie, its hard to see the remake with all the special effects taking over the story.

reply

So they've just sped up the footage?

Whatever they've done I agree with SJ it looks worse and un-natural.

Still Clash of the Titans (81) is an awesome movie, I had it on VHS as a kid and watched it pretty much of repeat:

I only saw the remake once at the cinema and it was catastrophically bad.

reply


Yes it is! One of the all time best movie illusions.

😎

reply


Do you know what they used for the tornado in The Wizard of Oz?

😎

reply

Didn't they use a sock or something like that?

reply


Yes! A muslin wind sock!

😎

reply

It was made of cloth and all done on a sound stage:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wizard_of_Oz_(1939_film)#Special_effects,_makeup_and_costumes

reply


It was a muslin wind sock.

😎

reply

🍆...I STOPPED READIN AFTER THE WORD EXPOSE.

reply

Scooby Doo blood?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHXxHje_Ezc

reply

Groundbreaking.

reply

Probably half the shots in all six "Lord of the Rings" and "The Hobbit" movies involved "scale doubles".

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/d9/7c/a2/d97ca2608666a64d475d5b752b2bae7f.jpg

That is, very short or very tall people, dressed like the leading actors, possibly wearing leading-actor masks as well as full makeup, wig, and costume, all to create the illusion of the hobbit or dwarf characters being much shorter than the human and elf characters.

reply

I thought they mostly used force perspective.

reply

They did some of the time, but having listened to all the commentary tracks on the DVD too many times, I don't think there were many forced perscpective shots. Forced perspective shots can mean building sets or props to accomodate the shot, and it may have been cheaper to use the doubles as they were already on salary for the whole shoot.

I think there was a lot less of that in the awful "Hobbit" films, as they hired a short guy to play Bilbo and tall guys to play the dwarves, and 3/4 of the movies were just Bilbo and the dwarves.

reply