> Hard numbers are questionable but it is claimed that 20-30% of the Colonists were actually Loyalist
I've heard similar things, that about 1/3 were sympathetic to revolution, 1/3 were loyal to the king, and 1/3 just didn't give a shit. Also, there were quite a few in Parliament who were sympathetic to the colonists' complaints. If historian Pauline Maier has it right, if it had been possible to put a trans-Atlantic phone cable in place and enable real-time communications between Britain and North America, the revolution could have been averted as late as April 1776.
This is a good book, by the way: https://www.amazon.com/American-Scripture-Making-Declaration-Independence/dp/0679779086
It's been a long time since I read it and I need to give it another look. One thing I specifically remember is something she wrote about the language style in the Declaration of Independence. The document lists reasons for the separation, stating that King George had done this bad thing, he had done this other bad thing, et cetera. Well, when a loyal Englishman petitioned the government for a redress of grievances, he did not complain against the monarch personally -- the complaint was that the King's ministers had done bad things. Stating that the King himself had wronged the colonists was a deliberate choice -- in Maier's words, it was "the language of treason."
reply
share