MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > I hate when a movie title is someone's n...

I hate when a movie title is someone's name.


All these titles suck equally:

John Carter
Patch Adams
Michael Clayton
Ned Kelly
Charley Varrick
Billy Elliot
Corky Romano
Harry Brown
Jerry Maguire
Bob Roberts
Barton Fink
Donnie Brasco
Alex Cross
Jack Frost
Vera Drake
Billy Madison
Wyatt Earp
Donnie Darko
John Wick
Annie Hall
Simon Birch
Charlie Bartlett
Jack Reacher

Then you have the single names:

Ray
Hanna
Anna
Rebecca
Victoria
Logan
Rambo
Amelie

These titles are so damn lazy. It's like they're trying to make a character popular. And when they use a first and last name, I can't tell if it's based on an actual person and they're expecting me to know it, or if it's one completely made up.

reply

Don't forget Selena!

reply

Dolores Claiborne

reply

Also he hasn't Billy Madison but forgot Happy Gilmore!

reply

I had so many in my head and I quickly typed them before I forgot it.

reply

Rambo, but no Rocky.

reply

Stallone was also in "Oscar" and I didnt put that either.

reply

I've never given this much thought, but your probably right. However I have thought about this when it comes to songs. I've thought it just seems weird to write an entire song about just a person. One song that has always annoyed me that I can think of is "Mr Jones" by the Counting Crows. Same with "Brian Wilson" by the Barenaked Ladies. Two of the stupidest songs I've ever heard.

reply

"Brian Wilson" isn't even a song. It's an embarrassment.

reply

I'm really thinking that you've never drove downtown in the rain 9:30 on a Tuesday night, just to check out the late night record shop.


reply

I'm more of a "One Week" guy.

reply

šŸ‘

reply

I don't really mind that, though I do agree it's a bit lazy and a story can benefit from a more original title.

HOWEVER I think it's worse when it's a historical or biopic, since there's probably a wealth of life stories you could pull from for a title. If it's a fictional character, like Amelie or Rambo, I don't mind as much, since the movie is about the fictional narrative they've constructed for them.

What really gets my goat are films that only take one of someone's full name. They do this especially with remakes and biopics, I find, an example being 'The Times of Harvey Milk' from 1984 being condensed to just 'Milk' in 2008. But yeah, things like 'Capote', 'Ray', it feels like they're trying to add a weight to the name that just isn't there.

reply

'The Times of Harvey Milk' from 1984 being condensed to just 'Milk'


Condensed milk? Was that on purpose?

reply

im gonna say yes because that makes me look clever

reply

I don't feel that these title are necessarily lazy. Sometimes, it only makes sense that a work is named after the most important character (who will be the protagonist in at least 90 % of the cases, but not always).

reply

Maybe something like RoboCop.

reply

I neither agree nor disagree with your statement, but whatā€™s the alternative for ā€œForrest Gumpā€?...Town Fool....Village Idiot...The Dr. Pepper Dolt?

reply

The Ping Pong Player.

reply

The Man Who Ran Across America and Back

The Bus Stop

A Box of Chocolate

or Jenny Got AIDS

reply

"A box of chocolate" could have worked. :)

reply

Oh come on. "A Box of Chocolate" is way lamer than "Forrest Gump". A title has to represent a movie in its whole. Not just a single handpicked scene. So what if the title has to be the name of the person as long as it fulfils that meaning.

reply

I never said that the movie shouldn't be called "Forrest Gump".
But "A box of chocolate" was my favorite suggested alternative title.

reply

I'm glad to know you wouldn't change the title :-) but you did write "could have worked" (I understood you meant it as a replacement for Forrest Gump). But even so, I still disagree, lol. I know... I'm such a pain sometimes.

I think if I really had to give it another title it would be something like "Thirsty for Life" or "Never Enough of Anything" or "Heart Goes, Man Follows" or some other crap like that.

reply

I like "Heart Goes, Man Follows". :)

But yeah, there's no real point in throwing out alternative titles here. The movie has a title already, that will not change because somebody doesn't like seeing a character's name as the full title.

reply

I agree with you. (and thanks, by the way)

reply

The Man Who Ran Across America and Back

The Bus Stop

A Box of Chocolate

or Jenny Got AIDS


Iā€™m probably going to Hell for it but boy that made laugh šŸ˜‚

reply

"Lieutenant Dan and his Magical Space Shuttle Titanium Alloy Legs"

reply

'this is martin bonner'
i think that's a great title. doesn't say much about what you're going to watch, perhaps, but after you've watched the film, it fits it perfectly.

reply

I don't mind that because it's not just a name. Although, they're one removal of an "n" from a completely different title.

reply

Or numbers.

reply

Or when they put numbers into the number like "Se7en".

reply

Man, you really are something. I hope that if one day someone makes a movie about a guy who has a useless trouble with lots of movie titles... he calls his movie "samoanjoes".

reply

I'm just saying it's lazy is all.

reply

I'm not sure, man. Well, maybe some times, yeah. But I bet there are times where they sit down, brainstorm or whatever and the best option they are left with is the name.

It never annoyed me and I personally never even thought it could be a problem. That's why your original post really surprised me.

reply

Yeah the think they're being clever but it just looks stupid.

reply

I wrote a topic on The Matrix 4 page saying how they're probably going to call it The M4trix. I wouldn't be surprised if they do.

reply

They missed out Ma3x.

reply