MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Are British actors generally better than...

Are British actors generally better than American actors?


This thought train started when I realized that oftentimes American characters in movies are played by British actors. After so-so performances by Toby Maguire and Andrew Garfield, it took British Tom Holland to finally deliver a great Peter Parker. After Michael Keaton, Val Kilmer and George Clooney, it took British Christian Bale to deliver a great Batman. After Brandon Routh it took British Henry Cavill to deliver a great Superman (in Man of Steel at least).

And it isn't just in superhero movies. It is film/television in general. The following is an interesting explanation for the difference in the quality of performances between American actors versus their British counterparts:




This is an issue that extends beyond superhero films, to films in general. America has a young actor crisis. The topic has received quite a bit of coverage over the last couple of years, especially after the totally American story of Selma came out and people realized four of the primary characters were played by British actors.

The Atlantic did a feature on it, in which Michael Douglas commented on the issue, saying:

"Clearly, it breaks down on two fronts. In Britain they take their training seriously while in the States we’re going through a sort of social media image conscious thing rather than formal training. Many actors are getting caught up in this image thing, which is going on to affect their range."

Young actors from Britain, Ireland, Australia and other locations have grown up with their television dominated by American shows. They have heard American voices coming out of that box, every day, and they've mastered mimicking those accents. That means the best of those actors can cross the ocean and compete on a level playing field against the best young American actors. Add in the emphasis on training, overseas, and those young foreigners acquire an edge over many of their American counterparts.

Many young actors build their foundation in television before breaking into film. All one has to do is watch some American television and some British television and some structural differences will be noticed - differences that help young British actors and hinder young American actors.

The following is, of course, a generalization. Exceptions are easy to name. You might be tempted to reply with "What about Walking Dead and The Wire?" Well, they both starred British actors playing Americans. One doesn't need to be an absolute to have impacts.

American television has a heritage and tradition of glamor. American television characters are supposed to be better looking, better dressed, more articulate, and more superlative than the people watching television. There is a perspective that for a story to be interesting, it has to be about the best. The protagonist of a cop show should be a super cop. Police detective Kate Beckett, on Castle, has to be supermodel beautiful and thin, and yet still able to tackle a 240 lb bad guy. She has to be able to chase down a teenager in Nike's while she is wearing five inch heeled Christian Louboutin shoes. She does all this while wearing a $2200 jacket (that she'll have replaced next week with another $2000 jacket), and $600 jeans. She'll do all of this without sweating or getting a hair out of place. The protagonist of a law show has to be a GQ underwear model with an eidetic memory for the law and the charm to win over every jury. Soap operas are about the rich. Sitcoms like Friends are about beautiful people that rarely go to work. They sit in their palatial apartments wearing designer clothes and seemingly spouting spontaneous witticisms that took nine writers a week to refine.

American television has a foundation of depicting youth, vitality, exceptionalism, and wealth, and doing so in a weird warped world where everyone lives in either L.A. or New York, but has a nondescript middle of the country accent.

This is tough on actors. Rather than developing their skills at disappearing into multivariate characters, their job is to always look cool. Their job is to become a brand.

Conversely, British television has a foundation of reveling in the linguistic, economic, and cultural diversity of that small group of islands. A young actor will go from playing a cockney thug one week to a Yorkshire farmer the next, to a member of the 1920s landed gentry the next. Their job is to depict characters that feel real, not fantastical. Their skills get regularly worked and enhanced. Their job is to become a chameleon.


https://www.quora.com/Why-does-Hollywood-keep-casting-British-actors-to-play-American-superheroes

TLDR: An American actor's job is to become a brand while and British actor's job is to deliver a compelling performance.

reply

Yes. Even their movies and music are better.

By the way, Andrew Garfield is British. He was born in LA, but left at a young age.

reply

By the way, Andrew Garfield is British. He was born in LA, but left at a young age.


This I did not know.

reply

I've always felt that exceptional actors require a tenuous grip on reality. The vast majority of celebrities in general prove me out. Yes yes there are exceptions to every rule... geez.
I will enjoy their performances when it suits me, drop them like rotten fish when they're stupid enough to show me how obnoxious they really are, and not give a damn otherwise.
Please - these are spoiled brats that make a living by pretending to be more interesting people. And we treat them better than doctors, nurses, firemen, cops, soldiers...
It's pretty disgusting.

reply

Even though it pains me to say so, I tend to agree with the OP. British, Australian and Canadian actors tend to be better at their craft than do Americans. The reason this pains me is that I am an American.

reply

Oh no doubt. I'm just having a problem with Hollywood in general these days.

reply

One main difference between British and American actors is approach to role.
British actors approach to role with theatar style. Often too dramataic and sometimes over the top with theatrical acting

American actors approach to role with cool style. 90% of their characters are cool,no matter of movie settings. Are they good,evil,poor,rich what time is it etc.

I like Britihs style more. That being said,Christian Bale uses cool syle with his characters more tan theatrical style.

Tv Shows are interesting. British comedy from 70's and 80's is still unmatchable. US comedy is good until 90's. I say US drama is better.

reply


British actors approach to role with theatar style. Often too dramataic and sometimes over the top with theatrical acting


I agree with "theater style," but I don't understand what you mean by "too dramatic" or "over the top." Actors like Anthony Hopkins, Sean Connery, Judi Dench, Helen Mirren etc generally have effortless yet compelling performances. Even younger actors like Benedict Cumberbatch or Kate Beckinsale very seldom seem to overact. Unless you're talking about much younger actors like Eddie Redmayne (in Jupiter Ascending) or John Boyega (always screaming "Rey!" in Star Wars)?

reply

No.

reply

I don't think so but I have noticed a lot of Brits can do a very good generic 'American' accent and are very convincing whilst Americans seem to be horrible at Brit accents

Just watch Keanu in that Dracula movie as a great example of poorly feigning a British accent

reply

I've noticed the same thing. Some American actors can do a decent British accent, but a fair number of Brit actors are so good at American accents I had a hard time believing they weren't American at first.

reply

Andrew Lincoln from The Walking Dead comes to mind
I had NO CLUE he was English for the first season or two

reply

Never seen TWD, but one that comes to mind for me is Damian Lewis, in both The Forsyte Saga and Homeland. Especially Homeland.

reply

I think that's a matter of personal opinion, as well as national pride playing a part. I've seen good and bad actors from both sides of the pond, and honestly, I don't think it's fair to dump on all American actors, just because you either hate your own country, or you're from another one that wants to dump on us to make yourselves look superior. There are many roads to being a good or even an amazing actor. Nationality should not be a consideration in this matter.

reply

I think it can seem that way just because Britain has so many actors and so many of them are really good. So in terms of quantity Britain's acting talent probably goes deeper. But having said that the best American actors are just as good as the best British actors in my opinion.


reply

very good at playing americans

reply