James Dean being Resurrected for Screen is Morally Wrong
seriously Maybe we as Human Race deserve the Apocalypse for This
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/afm-james-dean-reborn-cgi-vietnam-war-action-drama-1252703
seriously Maybe we as Human Race deserve the Apocalypse for This
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/afm-james-dean-reborn-cgi-vietnam-war-action-drama-1252703
People said something similar 2000ish years ago, and that turned out fine.
shareI don’t really have a problem with this morally, I just find it completely gimmicky, unnecessary and unfair to living actors who need the work.
This won’t entice me to see the film at all. If I want to see Dean, I’ll watch Giant.
This makes me think of the scene in Tropic Thunder “I’m the dude playing the dude disguised as another dude”
shareGee, I guess Hollywood doesn't need actual live actors anymore, like the robots that are taking jobs on the assembly line - just CGI every role. 🙄 I think I have a permanent eye-roll now. 🙄 Sheesh.
sharethis is stupid.
shareIt will suck, because current CGI technology isnt good enough to replace living human actors.
This is going to be a piece of shit that will make a little money from the curious.
Ooh, it's getting there. CGI Christopher Lee in Rogue One was reasonably convincing.
But just because you can do it, doesn't mean you should. Dean's legacy doesn't really need a gimmicky coda like this. Find the next James Dean instead.
Actually, I thought that the CGI Tarkin and Leia in "R1" were creepy and unconvincing.
And that's why I said the technology isnt there yet - if "Star Wars" cant do it, nobody can.
Don't think we deserve the Big A for this, but it IS odd.
😎