MovieChat Forums > General Discussion > Stonekeeper's Winter Game: I recommend T...

Stonekeeper's Winter Game: I recommend THIS Mystery Movie #258 [Les Misérables (1998), guessed by FredBurroughs]


So you guys like to play games? Here is an investigation game that can be time consuming but it's lots of fun. Basically, I have a movie in mind and you have to guess which one it is. For each movie you guys are going to guess, I will give a hint that CONNECTS your guess with the movie I have in mind.

Example of connections: Actor, length, genre, aspect ratio, language, country, year, director, writer in common, rating, number of votes, nominations. It can even be something like: both movies involve a love triangle.

- The winner can either start a new game or say "pass". In case of a pass, the OP gets to start another one.
- After 12 hints, the point goes to the OP and he/she gets to start another one.
- Movie must have at least 3500 votes on IMDb.


Hint 1: Waltz with Bashir (2008) - History genre.
Hint 2: Taboo (1999) - Based on a novel.
Hint 3: Blame it on Fidel (2006) - Setting is in Europe.
Hint 4: A Bridge Too Far (1977) - Runtime at least 2 hours.
Hint 5: The Heroes of Telemark (1965) - Country in common: UK.
Hint 6: Tom Jones (1963) - Shares the plot keyword: orphan.

FredBurroughs wins with Les Misérables (1998), my favorite adaptation of Victor Hugo's masterpiece.

Scoreboard:
FredBurroughs: 74
StoneKeeper: 36
Allaby: 34
LauraGrace: 31
Kawada_Kira: 30
SkyCoyote5150: 25
Hownos: 13
KvlhokVjequs: 7
twinA: 4
Stratego: 3
MinaVladimir: 1
godewey: 1

reply

The Policeman (1971) * Israel

~~/o/

reply

That has fewer than 3500 votes so isn't admissible. :)

reply

D'oh!

~~/o/

reply

Waltz with Bashir (2008)

~~/o/

reply

Hint added.

reply

Taboo (1999)

reply

Hint added.

reply

Blame it on Fidel (2006)

reply

I'm surprised that, as a socialist, I've never seen or even heard of that movie. Looks intriguing.

Hint added.

reply

I thought you said you were a communist:
https://moviechat.org/general/General-Discussion/58adc001d1e5e20011e21349/Introduce-yourself

Do the two overlap to an extent?
Either way, I am happy to know you and your wonderful personality, great sense of character.

I'll share something about myself. I am religious.

Edit: The deleted entry below was a double post

~~/o/

reply

I'm surprised you remembered that two year old post lol (I'm also surprised that this site is already two years old; where does time go?). Yes I am a communist. I tend to use the words interchangeably. The word socialist tends to draw a somewhat less strong reaction from anti-communists, though to me it has the same meaning.

And thanks, I'm glad to know you too. :)

reply

Don't mean to stir a fire. You are very brave for openly admitting that. See you around. (^_^)

~~/o/

reply

The word doesn't have as much stigma as it once did. Ever since the 2008 economic crisis, more and more people, especially young people, have been becoming increasingly disillusioned with capitalism and open to socialism and, to a lesser extent, communism. The popular conception of socialism is still very reformist (a la Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, whom I don't consider socialists at all as they essentially advocate New Deal capitalism, or Jeremy Corbyn in Britain), but anyone who's been involved in the communist movement (such as it is in the post-Soviet era) has noticed a great difference over the course of the last decade, since 2008 and especially since Occupy Wall Street. Namely, it's easier to talk to people about the failure of capitalism and the merits of socialism. Before 2008, I almost only ever got negative reactions when I talked to people about socialism/communism, the Soviet Union and so on. Since then, people's attitudes have changed, more people express an interest and aren't as hostile. More people are listening and sympathetic, because it speaks to their life experience. Low wages, economic insecurity, job insecurity, unemployment, poverty, inability to afford public services like healthcare, widespread hopelessness and depression, crime, general social misery. People in their teens and 20s are openly saying that they want to get rid of capitalism. Marx has come back into fashion, and after Marx inevitably comes Lenin, though that hasn't quite happened yet (not in society at large anyway, though the number of people reaching the Lenin stage is also growing exponentially). The rise of the far right has further stimulated the growth of the left in reaction to it. With capitalism increasingly stagnant and young people more and more feeling that this isn't working for them, this trend is only going to continue in the years to come. The next big economic crisis, which is coming due, will herald big changes, I believe.

reply

[Long read. I was inspired.]

Where I live, the American South, a self-professed socialist receives weird stares from people. Never mind describing oneself as communist out of fear of being held in serious contempt by peers. I am 20-something years old. Much about the current U.S. economy is less than ideal as opportunities are not as commonplace as they once were in the workplace, which you have noted.

The residing administration has been very pro-business, yet anti-worker. Safety regulation standards have been rolled back in pursuit of short-term financial gain. That's also on top of prospecting job candidates being required to sign a waiver agreeing to not sue their would-be employers over any such concerns, which the court has decided to recognize and uphold. This now includes most Fortune 500 companies. There is on-going debate as to the legality of this practice since it seems to be crafted to squash class-action lawsuits, which are becoming increasingly normal due to the dismantling of said regulations.

America's Democratic Party is seeing a developing coalition of anti-corporate representatives gather momentum, being dubbed as "Libertarian" Democrats, who desire to remove money from politics, overturn "Citizens v. United", and introduce a cap aimed at limiting campaign contributions to small donors.

Personally, I do agree capitalism is in need of reform. What we are seeing is not the same system Adam Smith envisioned in his work "The Wealth of Nations", but rather, crony capitalism not unlike what Americans went through during the "Gilded Age" of the late 1800s. With the U.S. government being reluctant to use welfare capitalism, I have a good idea of what you are saying about society's issues.

During Karl Marx's lifetime, he expressed discontent at what he perceived as other people twisting his communist ideal into something it wasn't, namely Blanquism, an appeal to benevolent dictatorship under the system of meritocracy more concerned with immediate results than overall outcome.

I don't think Lenin will carry as much resurgence as Marx due to the baggage of Lenin's leadership, who caused millions of deaths subsequently carried out from it well before Stalin came to power initiating political purges of his own. Lenin was in a difficult situation of needing to stabilize Russia, but it meant brutally suppressing dissention, and even though it wasn't genocide by nature in creating the changes he thought was necessary, it still happened during his administration. Marx has enduring popularity today, being a more accessible figure to rally behind and wish to be affiliated with in similar political movements.

Regardless of the times and passing generations, 20-somethings are the ones always working the hardest out of all people, being the bulk of the task force at their physical prime attempting to learn skills while charting a course for the further years in their lives. The need for youthful expression is nothing new, the age where people are at their strongest sense of idealism to oversee the changes made in their society.

1920s United States saw a shift towards conservatism in the form of Prohibition and post World War I relaxed business attitudes. The 50s and 60s brought the people that made the Civil Rights Movement a reality under liberal movements. The 80s saw conservatives again sweep the nation with policies meant to safeguard American assets abroad while maintaining global influence. We might be witnessing another such shift.

Globalization has many rightfully worried about the welfare of their societies and cultures, concerned that their identity will be lost without due diligence to promote their well-being. Incidentally, this has spawned the rise of reactionary groups who wish to splinter growing community ties across the world, even if it means committing acts of violence and terror. In the grand scheme, their backlash is only temporary, even if successful, since the world is adapting to changing circumstances. Optimistically, I do believe we will survive these social disputes. The world is bound to come together, while staying true to what everyone holds dear.

Should capitalism be replaced with a new economic system much the same way feudalism gave way to it after medieval times, it will be at the helm of a post-scarcity society in the intervening years following another industrial revolution, this time in the form of A.I. and other kinds of automation. Just my thoughts. Feel free to share more of your thoughts with me in the future.

~~/o/

reply

Is there a trick to find old threads? A way to search for them?

reply

No, just memory, but that would be great if there's a way. I was looking for an earlier post in Allaby's record but found the one linked here instead.

~~/o/

reply

[deleted]

A Bridge Too Far (1977)

reply

Hint added.

reply

The Heroes of Telemark (1965)

reply

Welcome to the game! Hint added.

reply

Tom Jones (1963)

reply

Hint added.

reply

Les Misérables (2012)

reply