UPDATE: Ignore Feature - General Discussion Discussion

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 7 years ago

Are you logged in or logged out when you see them?

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

It only works when you're logged in, if that seems to be the problem.

reply

[–] [deleted] 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

That's weird... Maybe try emailing Jim about it?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Yes Jim is busy right now. He told me on facebook

reply

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 7 years ago

Yeah that sounds like a glitch. I haven't come across it yet though. But Leia is right, email Jim about it. He wants to know about the glitches so he can fix them.

reply

[–] God (311) 7 years ago

Ignored

reply

[–] Isthisyourhomework (283) 7 years ago

I think some of them have multiple accounts with extremely similar names. I blocked one of them as soon as I found out about the ignore button and two hours later one of his shitposts came up again.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Yes ignore them

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Wait... I just thought of something... If everyone is simply ignoring the trolls, how would they get reported and dealt with? Can mods still ignore people? Am I missing something here? Is the trick just to report before ignoring?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Report and ignore. I am a mod i know this.

reply

[–] napsdufroid (2077) 7 years ago

You're not a mod, liar

reply

[–] Traveler (211) 7 years ago

I'm assuming Jim knows how many times a user was ignored. Knowing this, it's easier to deal with trolls (some shadowbans would be great).

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Ah, yes. That would be useful. As long as he checks to make sure the people ignoring aren't just trolls ganging up on people.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

I am experienced at this don't you worry darling

reply

[–] Traveler (211) 7 years ago

Obviously yeah.
It will be your job too when you'll be mod I guess ;-)

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Shh... We don't know who the mods are yet. Don't blow my cover before I even start! 😉🙊
I did volunteer, though, and multiple people have voted for me, lol.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Sorry but I am The Lord of The Rings

reply

[–] Popcorn Kernel (2368) 7 years ago

Is there voting?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Not officially. But people have said how if they had to choose a mod, I'd be a good option, or similar comments; voting with words. Not making this up; just look at the "Interested in Being a MovieChat Moderator?" thread.

reply

[–] Popcorn Kernel (2368) 7 years ago

Ok thanks, I had not looked at that thread recently since I do not want to be a mod.
I'd sooner get a root canal with no anesthesia.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] CactusPants (363) 7 years ago

Do people know you from imdb?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Jim knows me from IMDb. We are good buddies.

reply

[–] CactusPants (363) 7 years ago

Ben, I know you from imdb and what the heck??

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Upvote me as your moderator Imperator ! I am impartial and fair !

reply

[–] CactusPants (363) 7 years ago

Do you have any other hobbies?? Why don't you go read a book, sleep or fly a kite?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

I am the best there is, the best there was, and the best there ever will be !

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Nope. I was never on IMDb. I just post sensible things, I suppose.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

You don't know how imdb boards work then. I do

reply

[–] neverstandinalone (641) 7 years ago

I didn't see the VOTE Thread..darn!

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Lol. You were one of the ones that "voted" for me, remember? c;

reply

[–] Popcorn Kernel (2368) 7 years ago

Not everyone will put the trolls on ignore. The other trolls want to see their posts so that they can continue the Itchy and Scratchy show.

Mods probably should not ignore anyone, since they need to see everything.

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Good point... Maybe mods will be able to see reported posts separately in order to act on them or something?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] April-151-CT (10210) 7 years ago

"Yes as a moderator i am seeing some reports but jim has told me not to act yet."

Such a ball buster....

http://i1082.photobucket.com/albums/j370/Jezey/Laughing%20Crying%20Gifs/ROFLMAO.gif

reply

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

You can just open a tab without being signed in if you want to see an ignored person... but that sort of defeats the purpose, doesn't it?

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah. Some of the trolls are really making a mess of the boards, though. I feel bad for people who are looking to join and are faced with this s***storm.

reply

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

If a board has any traffic it will have a lot of trolls, especially until moderators arrive doesn't matter where you go. Jim should've either moderated himself or had a few real life friends help him with this project when he started it just to avoid this situation. As I said before, a lot of these trolls are clever and it will require Blade Runner like skills to tell the trolls from the regular posters. It's at the point where he should try to quietly recruit some people from different boards, so he knows they aren't just kissing his ass to get the job.

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah, I know there will always be some trolls no matter what. Jim has dealt with a few trolls, but he's only one person after all.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

He's done a great job, but it's like opening a new shopping center with a cholera epidemic. What it good is a nice selection of stores and beautiful architecture if you have a space riddled with disease. The community is the most important priority when making a website.

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Meh, I don't think it's quite that bad, but interesting simile anyway. ;3

reply

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

lol... of course I'm exaggerating but when the majority of posts are troll ones then it needs to be the priority. If I ignored every troll, I'd lose more than half the content right now.

reply

[–] Ben (472) 7 years ago

Yes i am ignoring trolls. Still great work going on here! Great work Jim!

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah. Starting to regret ignoring some of them, but oh well. It's still better without their spam clogging everything.

Also, I think a better metaphor would be building a huge garden on your own. The flowers may be beautiful, but without help, the weeds will choke them.

reply

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

That works... I just thought the cholera metaphor was more vivid and more emphatically expressed my negative feelings towards them. Don't regret ignoring them... I'm just making sure before I pull the trigger on them because it's not reversible. Eventually I expect to block them all too. Why live under the illusion that the board is more active than it is? I'd rather see a smaller community with sincere posters.

reply

[–] Betty (65) 7 years ago

IMDB2

We deal with trolls harshly :p

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah. It kinda sucks that it gets rid of all the following posts instead of only the person you're ignoring, though. Like if a troll made a post, but someone made a witty comeback, I wouldn't be able to see the non-troll's response without logging out.

reply

[–] Sentient Meat (1509) 7 years ago

Just keep a separate window or tab open and you don't need to log out... or use incognito mode to view the ignored posts. No need to log in and out. But I'm truly not curious to see what they are writing so I don't even do that. I'm sure over time Jim will fix all of those things... seems like he's learning this on the job.

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah, I know there are ways around it. Just that I wasn't expecting it to happen.
Jim seems pretty experienced, though.

reply

[–] Ben (472) 7 years ago

Yeah Jim says less kissing his ass and more practical work. Chop Chop!

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

[deleted]

[–] Popcorn Kernel (2368) 7 years ago

Thanks jim. Sorry you had to drop everything to build this.

reply

[–] Traveler (211) 7 years ago

Thank you Jim!
I just wanted to report a little bug, I'm still getting notifications from people I ignored.
I know this function is a work in progress though, so no biggie.

Anyway, thank you again :-)

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

I'm getting the same problem. No big deal, though.

reply

[–] BenCaesar (612) 7 years ago

Funny i am getting the same problem too.

reply

[–] Kawada_Kira (7269) 7 years ago

I mean, it's better than nothing but I was really hoping for a Facebook-style block feature that makes yourself invisible to whomever you're blocking as well. On IMDb the ignore feature had little effect on determined trolls. A block feature would be better. Hopefully this is just a first step to that.

reply

[–] LeiaOfLothlorien (1980) 7 years ago

Yeah, that would be useful.

reply

[–] Spyinryan (70) 7 years ago

It's a start! The only ones not happy with an ignore/block button are the trolls! That's hilarious. They're going crazy over it! :)

reply

[–] wheelin176 (2026) 7 years ago

Thank you Jim

reply

[–] StyxNyx (859) 7 years ago

A million thanks Jim!! 😃👍👍👏👏👏

reply

[–] neverstandinalone (641) 7 years ago

Fantastic!!! I will however think twice or three before putting someone on ignore. Under one thread someone fits (due to prior comments on other threads) the idea of a troll, and on other threads will answer with a decent and relevant comment.

Thank you, Jim, once again!!!

reply