The 2020 Election was the most Sus election of our lifetimes and that's really saying something and we were not allowed to ask any questions about it for the last three years. Now YouTube is reversing that decision now that it's election time again. Why do you suppose that is? I predict a strong return of Russiagate
sharePillows are out in full force!
shareOh good, then they wont take this down...
https://twitter.com/SteveGuest/status/1561383265143083008
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
Leftists always lie.
Wokeness is Weakness.
Trump won.
https://twitter.com/jj_talking/status/1561391971054129152?s=20
Georgia 🍑We Have Video of Brad Raffensberger Admitting That Trump Won
"If 100% of the remaining votes (2%) went to Joe Biden, Donald Trump would have still won the state of Georgia."
Translation: "We are losing traffic to Rumble. We are sorry. We won't do it again...until 2024 of course. Then it is full Commie censorship!"share
Between February and April Rumble had 400 million visits.
Youtube had 97 billion visits
Not even close dude
For now, but they are growing fast:
In Q4 of 2022, Rumble’s MAU’s (monthly active users) surged 142% YoY from 33 million to 80 million — a record level of growth for the burgeoning company.
Compare that to Youtube’s 2021 Q4 to 2022 Q4 growth of just 3.2% (2.598B vs. 2.681B according to the BoA).
Rumble revealed exponential year-over-year revenue growth, from just $2.9M in Q4 of 2021 to $19.9M in Q4 of 2022. This represents an increase of 686.2% over just one year.
Compare that to Youtube, which saw a 2021-to-2022 YoY decline in revenue during its Q4 earnings. The Alphabet sub-business raked in a record $8.633B in revenue during Q4 of 2021, compared to a still massive $7.963B in Q4 of 2022.
If you thought Youtube’s 33.5X multiple on Rumble’s MAU’s was steep, the difference in revenue is even steeper. Despite Youtube’s 2022 decrease, the video giant still took in 400-times the amount of revenue that Rumble received in Q4.
However, for investors in Rumble, it isn’t about the size of Youtube’s lead, it’s about the speed at which Rumble is closing the gap. That’s an area where Rumble shines. Rumble’s year-over-year revenue growth of 686% not only outpaces Youtube’s current statistics, but it outpaces any year-over-year revenue growth metric for Youtube spanning as far back as 2015.
Youtube is notorious for its strict censorship policies which reach beyond things like copyright infringement into things like ideological censorship through tags like “misinformation.” Youtube retains the right to delete any video it disagrees with, and isn’t legally required to give a material reason why. Youtube also frequently demonetized videos that cover politically sensitive topics, and has even automatically removed subscribers from certain channels without permission of the users. Rumble, on the other hand, makes it their mission statement to avoid censorship at all costs, as long as the material in question is legal.share
Youtube requires creators to have reached 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 minutes of watch time — Rumble allows for immediate monetization.
Youtube’s search algorithm is guided, meaning particular voices and businesses have a higher likelihood of receiving organic traffic than most small time creators — particularly those who release “edgy” content. Rumble’s search is a simpler calculation, and is intended to be unguided, meaning small creators have the same potential to receive organic search traffic as large creators.
Youtube hasn't got much higher to go. Rumble has. The notion that Rumble could ever be competitive with Google is utterly laughable.
shareDid you even read the entire quotes from the article?! No, of course not, you glanced at the first couple of lines and then you complain about others evading your stupid deflective and irrelevant questions.
Nevertheless; even if you were to read any or all of it, you have zero capacity to understand or comprehend anything. Zero common sense.
I am well aware. Rumble is growing, and Youtube is not. Youtube is an utterly massive site that already utterly dominates and quite literally can't realistically grow. Rumble can grow a lot and still be nowhere near Youtube.
I doubt Youtube gives a flying fuck about Rumble.
You are aware of absolute nothing except the rubbish that you were programmed to.
Based on that last answer, you are still clueless as to the information from those quotes. Go back to your very last sentence and tell me, what happens when Youtube looses a majority percentage of their subscribers/viewers and switch over to Rumble?! Don't think too hard on that but give it enough time and you will see.
>Based on that last answer, you are still clueless as to the information from those quotes. Go back to your very last sentence and tell me, what happens when Youtube looses a majority percentage of their subscribers/viewers and switch over to Rumble?! Don't think too hard on that but give it enough time and you will see.
You genuinely think that Youtube is going to lose a majority of their subscribers and viewers to Rumble?
Rumble would literally crash. It would be unable to actually support even 10% of Youtubes numbers.
LOL, LMAO: add servers, increase bandwidth, add programmers, etc. etc. etc.
Yes, with all their money and natural appeal.
You are living in a fantasy world if you think Rumble can compete with Youtube any time soon.
Yes, with all their money.
19million revenue vs. 8 billion
Plus Youtube is part of Google.
This is like thinking that the Daily Wire can compete with Netflix
Like I said, give it time. Ask keeliar to explain those two quotes for you.
shareGive it how long? 20 years? It's just utterly absurd.
shareIt is not going to take anywhere near that long:
Rumble = 686.2% over just one year vs YT = 3.2%
If took Disney around three years to accomplish in subscribers/viewers/revenue what it took NF to do in 15.
Disney Surpasses Netflix Subscriber Count:share
>It is not going to take anywhere near that long:
Rumble = 686.2% over just one year vs YT = 3.2%
You assume Rumble grows at the same rate each year.
>If took Disney around three years to accomplish in subscribers/viewers/revenue what it took NF to do in 15.
Disney is a massive brand with a ready to go huge back-catalogue.
Also Netflix still has 100 million more subscribers than Disney globally.
No need to assume anything since 686 vs 3.2 is just an example of their rate of growth.
NF is still losing subscribers while Disney is gaining.
Three years vs fifteen which is one fifth of the time it took NF to accomplish NW.
It was 100-million globally last year, but now it is down to 71 million. Within the next three years, Disney will likely take the reign.
It took Disney 5 months to reach 50-million while it took NF 7-years to reach that same number.
My point is that it will not take Rumble anywhere near 20-years.
>No need to assume anything since 686 vs 3.2 is just an example of their rate of growth.
Do you assume growth rates are constant?
>NF is still losing subscribers while Disney is gaining.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/250934/quarterly-number-of-netflix-streaming-subscribers-worldwide/
This isn't true
>Three years vs fifteen which is one fifth of the time it took NF to accomplish NW.
It was 100-million globally last year, but now it is down to 71 million. Within the next three years, Disney will likely take the reign.
Netflix has 230 million subscribers. Disney has actually also lost some subscribers: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1095372/disney-plus-number-of-subscribers-us/
>It took Disney 5 months to reach 50-million while it took NF 7-years to reach that same number.
Disney is a massive brand with a ready to go huge back-catalogue and tons of money and trust behind their name and longevity.
>My point is that it will not take Rumble anywhere near 20-years.
Rumble is not Disney.
Where did I say "constant"?...again 686 vs 3.2 in one year alone so it does not need to be anywhere near that much every year.
From Mar 10, 2023 and updated on May 30, 2023
Netflix will lose viewers for the second consecutive year in 2023, according to our new forecast update. The number of viewers is expected to decrease by 0.5% to 170.6 million
Netflix Inc. lost more than one million users in Spain in the first three months of 2023 according to market research group Kantar, a sign that the streaming giant’s crackdown on password-sharing could backfire.
>Where did I say "constant"?...again 686 vs 3.2 in one year alone so it does not need to be anywhere near that much every year.
I suspect its growth rate will decline.
>Do you ever understand anything?!
You're referencing the one site, that I can see that claims that Netflix has 170 million global subscribers. Every single other source I find identifies it as being at 230 million.
And you ignored Disneys slump.
>I'm making a point that it does not need to take 20-years like you claim.
There's zero way that Rumble could compete in the way Disney did after they set up. There's several orders of magnitude of backing and difference between them.
the only election you are allowed to say was stolen was the 2016 election.
here is Hillary saying the election was stolen.
Stellar work sir, on multiple levels. As Trump broke the "brains" of so many establishment drones, so this video seems to have broken the brain of the youtube Censorbot3000 hivemind. Memorializing the naked duplicity of the leetest of the leet shitbags and doing it on one of their foremost platforms of thought control deserves some kind of deep cosmic reward.
https://youtu.be/uoMfIkz7v6s
Donald Trump has not been elected president. The real election takes place December 19, when the 538 Electoral College Electors cast their ballots – for anyone they want.
If they all vote the way their states voted, Donald Trump will win. However, in 14 of the states in Trump's column, they can vote for Hillary Clinton without any legal penalty if they choose.
We are calling on “Conscientious Electors” to protect the Constitution from Donald Trump, and to support the national popular vote winner.
https://www.change.org/p/electoral-college-make-hillary-clinton-president-on-december-19-2017
Lolz....This petition had 4,880,210 supporters
Who hasn't been allowed to ask questions? All you folks do is ask fucking questions. You just won't accept the answers.
sharehttps://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/646276cd14b76e179e8b58cb/The-Hillary-BIG-LIE
Dems didn't accept the answers in 2016, they went on to complain for 4 years that Trump stole the election. 1 of the 4 attempts to illegally remove Trump was successful.
The usual gas lighting from haslet errr IP.
The ignore list is calling. This lemminGPT bot has grown boring.
YouTube is worthless for political discussion. Too much is censored.
Use:
Rumble
Bitchute
For real discussion.