Thugs take a person's personal property and play keep away by throwitng it to each other. The victim takes out a gun and shoots the thugs dead. I think it should be justifiable homicide because it would make for a more peaceful society.
shareWhat is the ethnic makeup of the incident? A minority against minority would just make a one day story in towns like houston that defund the police. With no police it is up to the people to do justice for themselves.
share"The HPD is the 5th largest police agency in the United States with a staff of 5400 sworn police officers and more than 1600 civilian employees."
You sound like a typical gun nut who just wants to kill people.
Video??
shareKyle Rittenhouse
The people he shot had priors like child endangerment, child abuse...
There were groups of criminals consisting of child predators and violent people going around assaulting people and burning property.
Democrats came up with the stand down policy which allows riots to occur
Vigilantism is illegal. Are you suggesting vigilantes should be shot by vigilantes?
shareNo when people with prior records are going through streets assaulting people and burning property.
The riot police should be able to Capture and arrest.
The Democrat policy or stand down and low riots to occur for days is retarded
Democrats went from soft on crime to pro crime. They set up savings funds to bail out people doing this.
Democrat prosecutors came out and said we will not charge people for resting arrest
How do you know a stranger has a prior record?
Anyway, vigilantism is illegal and unconstitutional. You may want to read the sections in the Constitution about "innocent until proven guilty" and "entitled to a fair trial" before taking the law into your own hands as judge, jury and executioner.
The people who rittenhouse shot and vile priors.
Taking a good look at all the BLM rioters, they all have criminal histories.
They was people wanting to steal his gun. All the reason a person carries a gun for is to protect the property they have.Republicans for guns. Democrats for giving everything to their China bosses when they come here.
shareThey were attempting to disarm a mass murderer with a gun.
This is the reason why only police and other law enforcement should be allowed to openly carry guns. It's too easy to confuse the motives of a citizen with a gun.
There have been multiple situations in which a mass murder was taken place and an armed citizen refused to shoot the killer because he didn't want to be mistaken as an accomplish by the police and shot by them. There have been plainclothes police who have been shot by uniformed police who mistook them for a criminal.
Your Wild West fantasy has too many innocent Americans killed each year. Leave the fantasy for TV and movies.
May I ask the fraction of a percent of gun owners that are mass murderers?
sharePeople with child abuse charges who were running around assaulting people and burning property were attempting to disarm someone who got in their way...
Ha ha ha ha ha
Kyle Rittenhouse did nothing wrong.
shareWhat would be the lower age limit of your system?
shareSelf-defense is defensible. Snuffing life for the sake of making "a more peaceful society" is less so IMO. There are punishments on the books for robbery and none AFAIK include capital punishment. Taking the law into one's own hands, unless there is no other way and a life is dependent on it, is not a peaceful society.
shareIt's justifiable. Sometimes people need to learn a lesson the hard way.
If you fuck around, you'll find out. Don't want to find out? Then don't fuck around.