Sen. Kamala Harris of California said during Wednesday night’s vice presidential debate with Vice President Mike Pence that she does not trust the administration’s push to rush a coronavirus vaccine into production.
“If the public health professionals, if Dr. [Anthony] Fauci, if the doctors tell us that we should take it, I’ll be the first in line to take it. Absolutely,” Harris said during the live debate in Salt Lake City, when she was asked if Americans should take a vaccine, if the Trump administration were to approve one either before or after the election. “But if Donald Trump tells us that we should take it. I’m not taking it.”
“He did it on purpose”
“It’s the modern day Zyklon B”
“Trump/Putin/Hitler”
“Worst attack on humanity since holocaust”
Remember the fake onscreen Death-counters? Remember the dumbuck Democrat lemmings swallowing it whole.
Remember the time a Democrat lemming thought for themselves for 5 seconds? Me neither.
Harris is just another dumbass Democrat who’s never accomplished a thing in her life. She blew Willy Brown and kickstarted her career. And since then it’s always been the first brown female yada yada.
What do you think the narrative will be if he wins in 2024? Day 1 will be the release of all the side effects, injuries, deaths...all of it. And it will be pinned on the new President. Bank it. They will let him win if it means saving their own skins.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
You seem to always dismiss videos, articles, and sources, especially since you don’t finish reading or watching them until the end.
From the last paragraph of your link:
During this time, VAERS received 19,476 preliminary reports of death (0.0029%) among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. CDC and FDA clinicians review reports of death to VAERS including death certificates, autopsy, and medical records.
Your supervisors are going to dock your pay for been a constant contradiction to your own lies. reply share
Keep accusing me of being paid to post here, and I'll keep reporting you.
CDC records self-reporting, but the actual amount of confirmed deaths due to the vaccine is tiny. Recieving reports doesn't mean they're automatically accurate.
but the actual amount of confirmed deaths due to the vaccine is tiny
Tell that to the families of those that died.
So typical for you to downplay the significant number of deaths.
I’m sure your bosses finds this unacceptable since they prefer a much higher percentage.
Recieving reports doesn't mean they're automatically accurate.
Precisely, since they are been paid to manipulate those numbers.
Your supervisors will also dock your pay for misspellings. reply share
Pfizer is trying to get the FDA to approve their latest vaccine which is almost certain to cause Guillain-Barre Syndrome.
People around the globe have suffered serious adverse reactions resulting from COVID vaccines, especially from the Pfizer shot.
Now the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tells us another Pfizer vaccine can cause serious complications in recipients. After receiving Pfizer’s Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) shot during a clinical trial, two older individuals contracted Guillain-Barré syndrome.
This was enough for the FDA to flag the disease as “an important potential risk” from the RSV shot. Yet Pfizer is still seeking approval for general public use.
According to the Mayo Clinic, Guillain-Barré syndrome is a rare disorder in which your body’s immune system attacks your nerves.
What? CDC records self-reporting, but the actual amount of confirmed deaths due to the vaccine is tiny. Recieving reports doesn't mean they're automatically accurate.
"When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event."
Thousands of healthy people from different age groups, suddenly and inexplicably fall dead sometime after the vaccine; is not a coincidence; only a sellout or shill would claim that it was a coincidence. Not to mention the terrible side effects that have injured and crippled those with the listed side effects.
Everyone responsible for creating and/or funding that virus along with the mandates/vaccines has everything to lose if they admit it.
They have profited from the virus, the mandates, and the vaccines and they will continue to lie, deny, and cover-up the actual number of deaths and injures caused by the vaccine for the sake of profit. Anyone defending or denying this in any way is worse than just a lackey or pawn, but an accomplice to crimes against humanity.
I am literally quoting the VAERS website where it specifically says that a report of an adverse event is not documentation that it was caused by the vaccine. And the notion that thousands of people have "suddenly fell dead" after the vaccine is complete nonsense. Actual documented cases have barely exceeded like 10 in the USA.
Why do I know no-one who has suffered any side-effect from the vaccine?
1. You dismiss everyone else’s sources and you try to replace them with your own regardless that they are deceptive, false, misleading, or inaccurate:
The first time I offered you evidence that China is Communist; this was your response:
No, regardless of what all those factsheets say, they are NOT communists…..trust me bro…..let me show you these articles where these trustworthy, and honest Chinese are saying that they are NOT Communists…ok….trust me bro.
When someone else recently provided you with their sources, this was your response as a projection of what you are constantly guilty of doing:
I am well aware of the claims you've made. I've heard them before. They're almost all propaganda, speculative and with dodgy sourcing.
2. You make assumptions for others by dictating to them what they are either thinking or implying as you just did on that previous reply: “does not say what you think it does”….You have also done the same to others on this site including recently to someone else, and this was their response to you:
“I never said or implied that. You don't get to tell me my opinion.”
3. When someone provides you with their sources, you almost immediately respond because you don’t bother to read the entire source but instead, you glance at it and then you use that as a narrative to dismiss the entire source with your own opinion.
reply share
I checked the VAERs site itself, and quoted what it literally says. It outright says that reports of death or injuries on here are not to be taken as evidence that the vaccine was relevant.
No, regardless of what all those factsheets say, they are NOT communists…..trust me bro…..let me show you these articles where these trustworthy, and honest Chinese are saying that they are NOT Communists…ok….trust me bro.
You of course, omitting that I literally gave you multiple sources that illustrate China's switch to becoming a state capitalist state. I didn't just base it from nothing.
2. You make assumptions for others by dictating to them what they are either thinking or implying as you just did on that previous reply: “does not say what you think it does”….You have also done the same to others on this site including recently to someone else, and this was their response to you:
What have I dictated to others, precisely?
3. When someone provides you with their sources, you almost immediately respond because you don’t bother to read the entire source but instead, you glance at it and then you use that as a narrative to dismiss the entire source with your own opinion.
You literally, point black, refused to open any of the sources I gave you regarding the shift of China's economic structure.
reply share
No, regardless of what all those factsheets say, they are NOT communists…..trust me bro…..let me show you these articles where these trustworthy, and honest Chinese are saying that they are NOT Communists…ok….trust me bro.
Also none of the sources I gave you were released from Chinese affiliated state media. They were all western sources, with western journalists and academics.
Why are you lying about the context of the sources I gave you?
reply share
All three things that I mentioned about you including the amount of posts in such a short period of time where you are provoking others as pointed out by the moderator.
It doesn't exactly take long to type replies on here, and your three points are just partisan claims about how you think I interact, and one point is an outright lie.
Also, I don't dictate to others how they think. That is an unfounded allegation. Regardless, none of them have anything to do with the accusations that I am some paid propagandist. Propaganda for what, exactly?
"Provoking others" by asking them to back up their claims, or simply giving responses in political threads? And I thought I was supposedly the sensitive one?
You pointed out quotes (and provided no contextual links). You didn't provide any examples of any users that apparently think I'm a paid propagandist. Only you have thrown that allegation against me.
Also, following me around on the forum and muscling in to accuse me of being a paid propagandist in discussions where it has no relevance seems to be borderline harassment per the forums rules, I would argue.
Jensen said, "Hospital administrators might well want to see COVID-19 attached to a discharge summary or a death certificate. Why? Because if it's a straightforward, garden-variety pneumonia that a person is admitted to the hospital for – if they're Medicare – typically, the diagnosis-related group lump sum payment would be $5,000. But if it's COVID-19 pneumonia, then it's $13,000, and if that COVID-19 pneumonia patient ends up on a ventilator, it goes up to $39,000."
Jensen clarified in the video that he doesn't think physicians are "gaming the system" so much as other "players," such as hospital administrators, who he said may pressure physicians to cite all diagnoses, including "probable" COVID-19, on discharge papers or death certificates to get the higher Medicare allocation allowed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. Past practice, Jensen said, did not include probabilities.
The coronavirus relief legislation created a 20% premium, or add-on, for COVID-19 Medicare patients.
If a Medicare patient is diagnosed with – or even presumed to have contracted -- coronavirus, hospitals across the United States are given more money from the federal government to treat that patient, economic assessments show. That amount can as much as triple if the patient requires a ventilator, making some wonder whether there is a financial impetus to overstate coronavirus numbers, with others calling such potential abuse "unlikely."
Ask FactCheck's conclusion: "Recent legislation pays hospitals higher Medicare rates for COVID-19 patients and treatment, but there is no evidence of fraudulent reporting."
The specific claim was that there is systemic corruption in the US healthcare system.
I never said there was systemic corruption. You just made that up.
Jensen clarified in the video that he doesn't think physicians are "gaming the system" so much as other "players," such as hospital administrators, who he said may pressure physicians to cite all diagnoses, including "probable" COVID-19, on discharge papers or death certificates to get the higher Medicare allocation allowed under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act. Past practice, Jensen said, did not include probabilities.
Recent legislation pays hospitals higher Medicare rates for COVID-19 patients and treatment.
Hospitals got more money for covid patients. They made more money off covid then regular illnesses.
This is disinformation. Anyone can SUBMIT a claim to VAERs, but an actual doctor have to validate it before it becomes an official entry and is the direct reason the backlog is so high, and it's really only representative of 1-3% of the actual reporting. So whatever VAERs reports, its probably way higher based on that information alone.
Please, no one take Skavau seriously...he is a leftwing disinformation troll that barely reads past headlines.
________________________
Great minds discuss ideas.
Average minds discuss events.
Small minds discuss people.
"When evaluating data from VAERS, it is important to note that for any reported event, no cause-and-effect relationship has been established. Reports of all possible associations between vaccines and adverse events (possible side effects) are filed in VAERS. Therefore, VAERS collects data on any adverse event following vaccination, be it coincidental or truly caused by a vaccine. The report of an adverse event to VAERS is not documentation that a vaccine caused the event."
Its funny and ironic, because we both know that the dems would be the anti-vaxxers if Trump was still President. If someone wants to get the vaccine thats fine with me, but Biden made it mandatory. Thats tyranny. If Trump made the vaccine mandatory, the dems would be against it. Dems just do the opposite of whomever is in charge.
Trump did (eventually) endorse the vaccine. I never agreed with the vaccine being made mandatory by pressuring companies, but it was struck down if I'm right.
Can you tell me, by the way, why I know no-one, and have heard of no-one in my country that had adverse reactions to the vaccine?
>More than likely no one in your Country took the vaccine.
No. Everyone I know did. I live in one of the countries with the best vaccine uptake. Explain to me why I know no-one, and have heard of no-one in my country that had adverse reactions to the vaccine?
However, as previously reported by Reuters Fact Check, it is misleading to claim these figures show vaccinated individuals are more likely to die with COVID-19 than the unvaccinated.
A spokesperson for the Office for National Statistics told Reuters via email: “Looking at the proportion of deaths among the fully vaccinated without accounting for the vaccination rate is highly misleading. For instance, if everyone were vaccinated, 100% of people would die vaccinated.”
Echoing this, Professor of Biostatistics Elizabeth Williamson told Reuters via email that the “graph in no way indicated a negative vaccine effectiveness”.
She explained: “In a world where most people are vaccinated… we would expect to see the proportion of vaccinated people who die from COVID-19 to be lower than the proportion of unvaccinated people who die from COVID-19. At the same time, we would expect the number of vaccinated people dying from COVID-19 to be higher than unvaccinated, simply because there are so many more vaccinated people... In addition, those at the highest risk are also the most likely to be vaccinated, exacerbating this phenomenon.”
Well considering there are only 518 people in your Country it makes sense that no one has any adverse reactions yet.
Its good to hear everyone is doing well. More than likely everyone in your Country didn't have to take the McFranklinVax that was mandatory in the US. We had to take 4 shots and wear 2 masks.
>Oh ok, what are your thoughts about your Country raising the retirement age from 62 to 64?
I am not French. I'm British. Vaccine uptake was high here. No-one was forced either (strongly urged, admittedly). France was notably much more vaccine skeptic than much of Europe.
>There are 339 million in my Country and I am still waiting for the long term data on the mRNA vaccine. So far no one knows what the effects will be.
meanwhile everywhere outside America the sane people people are taking the vaccine to lessen the effects or because they are vulnerable enough that covid might kill them.
they are blissfully unaware of the illuminati conspiracy in which all the all the doctors and scientists have been enrolled to pass off this killer injection as a benficial 'vaccine'
4.All were characterized as “potential violations” or disinformation “events” by the Virality Project, a sweeping, cross-platform effort to monitor billons of social media posts by Stanford University, federal agencies, and a slew of (often state-funded) NGOs.
Picking out a quote from someone and basing the whole history of Covid on one out of context comment ... well, it's the kind of goofball tactic from the Right that most people are sick of.