MovieChat Forums > Politics > What if everyone in the world when they ...

What if everyone in the world when they went to work ...


and everyone in the world got paid the exact same amount of money?

What would happen, why would that happen, and how would that happen?

reply

Depends how much they enjoyed their jobs. And someone who has pressure, responsibility and liability would probably not appreciate it if someone who's only task is to turn up and push a broom (for instance) was getting paid the same. It would probably have a detrimental net effect on innovation and forward progress.

reply

Yeah, good start ... but then what?
The person who dedicated their every hour to work, like a CEO,
or a person too poor who had to work 3-4 jobs every day just to
survive would have to re-strategize their lives. How though?

reply

I think it would depend on how much money it is.

If it's more than what the majority currently makes, it might be accepted.

If it's less, then it won't.

reply

Oh, I am sure it is impossible, and whether it would in theory work or not, the establishment people would make sure it didn't work. It's not a suggestion, just a thought experiment. Realistically what would happen?

If it was a living wage, would it be like an investment and then in a few years everyone would see if they wanted a raise they would all have to be more productive, or would people just not feel connected to salary so it would not motivate them?

reply

I have no idea. I think the socialistic UBI is in our future because of its simplicity. A communistic salary raises too many questions.

reply

What I was speculating about has nothing to do with communism, just the opposite of the massive inequality. Communism doesn't even have a definition in this day and age, if it ever day. Socialism is merely an economic and financial take on democracy because how can you have democracy when you have money as the primary arbiter of political reality in America? You can't, and in fact we are not even a republic any longer because there is and has been no representative of the people's interests in the US government or legislation for many years if not many decades.

reply

True the definitions are blurry depending on who you talk to. I see communism as the maximum that everyone is allowed to make, and socialism as the minimum everyone is allowed to make. But that's just me I guess.

Creating a solid ceiling (which I call communism) is problematic because it helps some who can't build high but restricts others who would normally be able to build higher.

Forcing that kind of ceiling goes against democracy unless the majority chooses it, but I don't see the majority choosing it until technology and infrastructure is at the point where everyone gets a ceiling thats pretty darn high.

reply

It always bothers me when someone attacks someone else's view of what communism or socialism or capitalism ... whatever is. Words are symbols, variables whose meaning comes from context and interpreting someone else's meaning means determining what they are trying to use their words to say. Words of the tools of people, not people to tools of words - or we are in the Orwellian world where we are slaves to words.

To me capitalism is the substrate, the basic archetype of trade and determining value, but that does not mean it is everything or should be the dominant determinant of reality, because if that is true then life is a game of monopoly and the first winner will determine the lives of everyone else in the game forevermore. That is an order that must be resisted and if necessary, overturned.

When Republicans make capitalism predominant, what they intend is anti-democratic, it is totalitarian, fascist, despotic, tyrannical, and only the people who believe they gain from such a system, or those who have grown up and been blinded to reality believe in it.

That is, capitalism, the market, always leads toward hierarchical power and tyranny, and in world history democracy only ever developed or meant anything in relation to its opposition to such a system. So that first their is human behavior, and then there are laws and conventions, society ... then in economic interactions first there is capitalism and then there is democracy developing to counter it, and then fascism to use the corruption of law and politics to control people leading to abuses, leading to democracy rebellion ... a continual process. Capitalism is the substrate of mass human behavior, and government and laws and democracy are there to regulate it to make sure the system exists to serve people and that it does not abuse those people, enslave them.

When I see how those terms are so often used in media in a political context, and that context is accepted by the political opposition, I see that we are wedged permanently in a fascist system that that oppresses and exploits the vast majority of people, and that the reason it does not get fixed is because people do not see it because their models of reality or corrupted so that the cannot put two and two together.

reply

To me capitalism is the power of the individual, and socialism is the power of a society.

We come together as a society for the common good, to keep the individuals out of the mud.

But in order to maximize happiness, we have to give power to the individual to compete with each other.

So we end up with this social/capitalist hybrid system where people fall to a certain point and then stop, and people simultaneously have the ability to build up to the clouds.

The problem we run into is when someone builds too high, they gain an additional benefit of having a louder voice than everyone else and can change government with that one voice. That is the primary flaw of capitalism in our system.

reply

Yeah, but you needs symbols, variable and models to be able to discuss that and model it.

reply

Jesus Christ....🤦🏻‍♂️

“Yeah, mr neuro surgeon...you’re going to take home the same pay as the guy who delivered the candy to the vending machine earlier today, even though you worked 14 hours straight today and saved someone’s life, but he delivered extra butterfingers to the machine. Yay socialism!”

I just can’t with this...

reply

I agree, but I think the OP is asking what would happen if people were paid the same per hour, not total.

reply

You can never get everyone in the world to want to work. Us rebels do need you to go work to pays us though.

reply