Do liberals know that Mohammed owned and traded slaves?

Jesus didn't own slaves but liberals have already been trying to cancel Christianity for years. "Too"? So you do feel it's time to cancel Islam?

Should the mob starting tearing down mosques along with monuments to George Washington and Thomas Jefferson?

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Slavery in biblical times isn't the slavery we know in recent history. It was a way to pay a debt. They willingly were slaves for a certain period of time till their debt was paid.
So please don't compare apples to oranges.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

LOL! The liberal squirming on this thread is hilarious. "Agency"? Islam is the most protected religious class in the world. It dominates about a third of the earth's land surface with a belt of theocracies and is the one major religion the Western PC left panders to, even absurdly having Islamist nutjobs like Linda Sarsour co-chair the so called "Women's March", and celebrating the radical anti-Semite Ilhan Omar's election to Congress. Western liberals spend time apologizing to Muslims after Islamist terrorist attacks murder massive numbers of non-Muslims.

The rest of your post is just as stupid. You claim Muslims have a "good idea what their prophet looked like"? That'd be a neat trick considering his image is strictly forbidden under penalty of death, even to the point where South Park's episode showing Mohammed was canceled by "Comedy" Central ("agency", lol?).

Unless, of course, you're saying all Muslim guys look the same. More irony from the ignorant, faceplant prone ultravioletx.

I won't bother clicking on the ignorant "white Jesus" bashing the left runs with from time to time that bigoted BLM drooling idiots are trying to make trendy again. Christianity isn't about cosmetic appearance. That's the left's obsession. But the so called "white Jesus" actually looks roughly like the Shroud of Turin image. Before that his depictions were speculative and all over the place, but they seem to have coalesced around a consensus standard a couple of centuries after his ministry that happened to resemble that Shroud image.

That was people in the East and Mediterranean who did that, before most Northern Europeans were Christian or even literate. Jesus was born as a Jewish guy in the Middle East, technically "Caucasian" in some of the oldest, broader racial categorization systems. He certainly wasn't "black" like BLM idiots are currently claiming.

At least you're honest enough to admit this though:

There's simply no room in the atheistic left for doctrine religions.

Agreed, except for the religion of Marxism, of course. Religious people should take note before voting for leftist candidates or endorsing leftist power expansions.

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Isn't it pretty to think so?

reply share

add reply

formatting help

Where did I mention "statues"? In fact I explicitly mentioned tearing down mosques above, sort of like how they've been burning Christian churches like the iconic Saint John's in the recent riots. Leftist "canceling" takes the form of deplatforming, changing place/institution names, vandalism, assaults, murders, getting people fired, and/or rhetorically attacking the target in the education system and media. Even just the latter would represent a 180 shift from current liberal practice of pandering to Islam, but would be required to bring the left's current "all slave owners are irredeemably bad and must be condemned regardless of context or what else they did" crusade to something approaching logical coherence.

Otherwise the liberals denouncing Washington and Jefferson are just hypocritical shitbags.

reply share

add reply

formatting help