Bloomberg - 78
Sanders - 78
Biden - 77
Who'd have thought that at 73 and with an energy and health of a man decades younger that Trump would be the young pup in this election?
Trump is 73 with dementia and morbidly obese. I can understand why he has hidden his health records from the American people.
shareWho'd have thought the oldest candidate would have the largest grassroots movement of younger voters.
Trump, Biden and Bloomberg are all competing with each other over geriatrics.
It's easier to indoctrinate the young. Wisdom comes with age. That's kind of a no brainer. But then again, what else is new? 🤪🤪🤪
shareWho'd have thought that at 73 and with an energy and health of a man decades younger that Trump would be the young pup in this election?
One of your guys has already been making noise about only serving one term if elected, and he's the young one of the group. Meanwhile your current front runner has already literally had a heart attack during the campaign.
It's all just worth noting given how much leftists like to whine about "old white men".
Again, I'm not sure what age has to do with anything unless you have some kind o prejudice or resentment against our aging population.
But if you want to talk medical history with Bernie Sanders, why is it that Donald T-rump was snuck out to the hospital on a Saturday during November, without even telling his wife ? He won't tell us - wonder what emergency procedure he had done at the hospital which couldn't be taken care of in the WH.
Trump claimed that he went to the hospital to get head start on his yearly physical exam. Of course his gullible supporters believe that.
shareAnd as everyone pointed out, that was pure BS - he could have done that in the medical facility located in the White House.
The story which made most sense was that he had stents put in after suffering a mild heart attack - like Sanders did. The truth will come out some day.
LOL! Here are you ignoring facts I posted to indulge in absurd age/health related speculation on Trump. You idiots often can't even maintain a coherent, consistent position through one exchange.
shareAs I said, earlier - IF YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT MEDICAL HISTORY WITH BERNIE SANDERS...
that was my lead in to my response to your post. We added the speculation on T-rump since he won't be honest with America (again) and you're a-ok with that (again).
As far as I know Trump's doctors are being honest when they say he's as healthy as a much younger man. It's believable. Trump seems to have boundless energy and even liberal pundits have commented (complained) about how he doesn't seem to visibly age anywhere near as fast as other presidents have. He actually seems to thrive on the high stress environment.
Meanwhile Biden is always confused, Boomberg has no charisma, and Sanders literally had a heart attack while campaigning.
As far as I know Trump's doctors are being honest when they say he's as healthy as a much younger man.
George W. Bush may have been the most physically fit at the time, but I've never seen a President with as much energy as Trump. You might have to go back to Teddy Roosevelt. Trump really does seem ageless. And he's a robust man who doesn't shrink from but thrives on challenges.
shareThat's a good way of dodging my question, so I will repeat it once again:
"So you believe Dr. Harold Bornstein's, T-rump's longtime personal physician, letter which described T-rump's blood pressure as 'astonishingly excellent' ? And when he assured Americans that Trump, then 70, would be “the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency” ?
You believe that ?"
I asked this question because you previously posted:
"As far as I know Trump's doctors are being honest when they say he's as healthy as a much younger man."
So please, answer the question. Thank You.
Get the sand out of your vagina. I already provided the relevant answer, which you included in your reply, LOL. He obviously hasn't examined every president in history but is giving a rough opinion that Trump is astonishingly healthy, which is certainly backed up by the aforementioned energy.
Your lame attack fails, especially given the facts in the op. You're trying to hit Trump on a strength when your own guys are clearly weak on that same point. Speaking of actual dodging, why don't you answer this question?
https://moviechat.org/bd0000082/Politics/5e501ce6017d35113a75ceef/Is-Trump-really-that-bad-Anti-Trumpers-personal-stuff-aside-what-actionspolicies-do-you-most-want-to-revert
The answer is a simple 'yes' or 'no', not a platter of bullshit to bury the fact you won't answer the simple question.
Here's one more request, which requires a "YES" or a "NO" :
"So you believe Dr. Harold Bornstein's, T-rump's longtime personal physician, letter which described T-rump's blood pressure as 'astonishingly excellent' ? And when he assured Americans that Trump, then 70, would be “the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency” ?
You believe that ?"
A simple YES or NO.
Who won the Democratic Iowa Caucus?
shareOK, another victory lap around krl97a as he dodges the question yet again, admitting defeat.
Thanks kid!
LOL! If we're scoring by dodged questions than you really got lost big. You couldn't name a single actual Trump policy you oppose or even say who won the Democratic Iowa Caucus, two much more important things than your nonsense question I already answered.
Doggiedaddy has to take another defeat lap.
"name a single actual Trump policy you oppose"
Separating crying migrant babies, toddlers and young children from their mothers and placing the children in cold cages to be starved, deprived of food, water, soap and toothpaste in order to entertain his evil supporters who are obviously into child abuse - if the child is a migrant, of course.
Which is nonsense of course. Were you opposed to separating illegal migrant children from the adults with them (who may or may not be their parents) back when Obama did the same thing, when they really were keeping kids in "cages", as opposed to the more comfortable set ups established by the Trump administration?
Are you really such a hopeless partisan hack that the worst Trump issue, the policy reason you hate him so much, is something he dramatically on over Obama and previous presidents? Is that what you're telling me?
Then there's the fact that "child separation" is just something practiced by every nation in the world, including every time an American with kids is arrested, because it's a logical necessity if you don't want to imprison children along with their parents. This is such a bogus, manufactured non-issue, awash in shallow crocodile tears.
"name a single actual Trump policy you oppose"
My answer is still:
Separating crying migrant babies, toddlers and young children from their mothers and placing the children in cold cages to be starved, deprived of food, water, soap and toothpaste in order to entertain his evil supporters who are obviously into child abuse - if the child is a migrant, of course.
Your justification, pathetic deflection and excuses are meaningless.
Did you hate and vote against Obama for separating crying migrant babies (or American babies for that matter, not that you apparently care) from their "parents" and putting them in "cages"?
Pointing out that you're lying about what's happening and a raging partisan hypocrite isn't meaningless.
When did you ask me to name a single T-rump policy I oppose or even say who won the DIC?
I think you're losing your mind.
Here's one more request, which requires a "YES" or a "NO" :
"So you believe Dr. Harold Bornstein's, T-rump's longtime personal physician, letter which described T-rump's blood pressure as 'astonishingly excellent' ? And when he assured Americans that Trump, then 70, would be “the healthiest individual ever elected to the presidency” ?
You believe that ?"
A simple YES or NO.
I'm betting you don't answer with a Yes or No.
When did you ask me to name a single T-rump policy I oppose or even say who won the DIC?
OMG, you're dense.
Why would I answer those questions when you can't stay on topic and answer the ones asked of you ? You really expected an answer ?
You've really lost it.
LOL! You mean the questions you just pretended you hadn't even seen me ask?
You asked me a stupid, irrelevant question with a childish, irrational "yes" or "no" restriction that I have no reason to answer on your silly terms, and yet I did answer it in an expansive manner with several lines of commentary.
Meanwhile you're too scared to answer my vastly more legitimate, reasonable, and important questions about what Trump polices you even oppose, and who won the Democratic Iowa Caucuses.
At least your inability to recognize when to cut your losses often leads to hilarity.
Simple yes or no, but continue to throw word-salad and hope that people have enough interest in what you write. I know I don't.
shareGotta give KRL some props. He pivots from a question he doesn't want to answer and then proceeds to vomit a word salad better than anyone on this board. Of course that makes him a dishonest hack, but he's still very good at it.
shareSays the dishonest hack with a grudge whose MO has become to skim the side of a debate, fire off a cheap shot, miss badly, then flee, avoiding any substantive discussion.
I commented more about health than anyone in this discussion. Since Doggiedaddy is a just a halfwit partisan troll who had no point and doesn't know when to cut his losses, I was rightly using his persistent presence as a prop for making other points, both for their own sake and to showcase how hypocritical and empty his comments are.
Gotta give KRL some props. He pivots from a question he doesn't want to answer and then proceeds to vomit a word salad better than anyone on this board. Of course that makes him a dishonest hack, but he's still very good at it.
Getting a straight answer is like trying to grab an eel.
shareAll I want is a yes or no to the question of whether s/he believes Dr. Harold Bornstein's letter about T-rump's health.
Instead I get this long-winded tome to dodge the answer (which I didn't bother to read) and no answer to my question. WTF?
Look fat, here's the deal. When you had a guy having a recent heart attack and another guy acting like a loopy hooplehead consistently not know what state he's in, how is it not an issue?
shareWhen Republicans stand behind a President who alters weather maps with a Sharpie and truly believes he's being taken seriously, it's not an issue. It's the least thing we need to worry about these days.
shareThat's the best you got? I guess having a heart attack doesn't alarm you to question ones health. Okay then. Also, I guess it's okay to overlook his claim that he would release his medical records in full that he claimed he would. I guess once you're a hypocrite, you can be hypocritical to everything. Then again, what else is new, yes? 🤪🤪🤪
share" I guess it's okay to overlook his claim that he would release his medical records in full that he claimed he would."
Simpleton Sandy, I guess it's okay to overlook his claim that he would release his TAX RECORDS in full that he claimed he would.
I guess once you're a hypocrite, you can be hypocritical to everything. Then again, what else is new, yes?
"I guess having a heart attack doesn't alarm you to question ones health. "
I guess having DEMENTIA doesn't alarm you to question ones health.
Exactly. That's the point. How can you allow Bernie to get away with it, but not Trump? Don't you see the hypocrisy?
Did I demand to see Bernie's medical records? No. Bernie VOLUNTARILY said he would release them and now he doesn't. That's the double standard, yet you and your komrades were too stupid to realize this.
Dementia alarms me as well, which is why Biden should release his records too.
Of course, Sanders is a hypocrite! I knew that three years ago when he branded himself as an outsider. How can a politician with est. 30 years experience be an outsider?
You hate hypocrisy, yet you support Trump. Unlike you, I have no interest in supporting demigods like Sanders nor Trump who would both destroy the U.S..
When are you going to put country before party like I have always done? You're very unAmerican.
Thank you for admitting the obvious. Now when are you going to admit that YOU are a hypocrite too for supporting Obama for bypassing Congress to enact policy?
I didn't even vote for Trump, but I am glad that he's in office over Hillary.
As Clint Eastwood said recently, when he was a politician, he sacrificed money. When the Clintons, Bidens, Obamas, and Gores got into politics, they made money. And yet, you supported every one of them.
Of course I support country over party. I do that by voting for the person who I think is best for the job. Do I always get what I want? No.
You say you support the country, yet you couldn't even admit that taking out Bagdadi was a good thing and you couldn't give credit where credit was due. That seems more party than country to me.
Is Pelosi for the country or the party? What about Schiff, Schumer, Nadler or Omar, pray tell?
"they made money"
Trump is breaking the Emoluments Clause.
Trump Golf Count: 247 Daytime visits to golf clubs since inauguration, with evidence of playing golf on at least 115 visits. Our last recorded outing was on February 15, 2020. Click on complete data table for a list of Trump's outings, or view our breakdown of total costs.
Cost to Taxpayer: About $130,000,000
https://trumpgolfcount.com/
"Of course I support country over party."
You're a liar. You're also an ideologue. Your anti-Democratic rhetoric is boring.
I like the fact that you ignore everything and key in on one thing and still manage to take it out of context. Such a talent you are.
So if Trump is making money via the Presidency and you are upset about it, then how the hell can you turn a blind eye that Clinton, Biden, Gore, and Obama all profited by it? Can you say hypocrite again???
Again, you key in on one thing and take it out of context and EVEN THEN, you got nothing to rebut the facts. Truly pathetic.
Your usual deflection every time Trump's criminality and anti-American behavior are brought up.
shareSandcan getting owned never gets old. Him and KRL are getting smacked around like pinatas ITT.
shareYou and your comrades have been flattened. Cue BuckSwope's retreat...
shareSaid the person that defends Obama and bitches about the executive branch usurping its branch of power. That tattoo on your forehead spells H-Y-P-O-C-R-I-T-E. Perhaps you should've gotten it tattooed backwards so you can read it everytime you look in the mirror.
shareSilly boy - Bernie's medical records are 'under audit' so he can't release them. Biden's too. All being audited. Very complicated - as complicated as T-rumps taxes.
shareYou do know the difference is that Trump never voluntarily said he'd release his tax returns, but only because that was what previous candidates did, while Bernie said he do it voluntarily.
Then again, what do you care? You're a Bloomberg bot. Orange Man Bad still overrides that, yes?
Trump stated during his 2016 campaign he would release his tax returns once they were not under audit. Is your position that they are still under audit? And you are aware that being under audit in no way prohibits a person from releasing their tax returns, right? Trump lied. He is a proven liar. It's pathological.
shareHe did release a tax return. Didn't you see that Rachel Maddow BOMBSHELL special???
shareLOL. Care to address my comment? Are you saying Trump is still under audit over 3 years later? He said he would release his returns once the audit was over. Is Trump lying? Is Trump still under audit over 3 years later? Care to answer?
shareI don't know. I don't work in that accounting firm. You did see that Rachel Maddow special, didn't you? Quite a bombshell, wasn't it? Like Hiroshima times 100, yes?
Now, bringing the goal posts back to where they were, it's okay that Bernie doesn't show his medical records, yes? Even though he said he would release them for transparency, yes? So tell me how it's okay for him to do it, but not Trump? Shall I read your tattoo for you again?🤪🤪🤪🤪
Talk about moving the goal post. I wasn't talking about Bernie's medical records you goofball.
So Trump hasn't released his tax returns which he said he would when the audit was over. Do you really think Trump has been under audit for over 3 years? Does that sound plausible? No, it doesn't. It's complete horseshit. Add it to the mound of lies that have come out of Trump's mouth. You support a lying sack of shit. How does that feel?
That's what the whole discussion was about in the first place if you bothered to read the entire conversation, rather than just jumping in in the middle. Go thing you're just a grunt and not an officer.
shareI read the entire conversation, but I only commented on Trump's tax returns. Do you know what you're doing here?
shareAnd if you did, you would''ve or at least should've realized Bernie's and his bots hypocrisy. Being that you failed to realize this doesn't shine a favorable light on your intelligence level. But then again, what else is new?
How's your thread doing? You know the one that you created and proved your own hypocrisy and willful ignorance?
I wasn't talking about Bernie. I was asking you direct questions. As usual, Lil' Sandy ducks and dodges and obfuscates. I don't know why I bother with you or KRL. You two are the worst hacks on this forum.
shareOkay. So by reading the entire thread, as you stated, you WILLFULLY IGNORED the point about Bernie. You know, stating that fact makes you look like a dimwit. Just FYI.
Maybe you ought to figure it out why you bother to reply to me BEFORE you reply to me. That doesn't make you look too bright either.
Just to be clear, I've already answered your question. I don't work in the accounting firm that's auditing his taxes. I don't know the workload and I don't know what the priority is. But then again, is it that big of a deal after the fact?
Yet once again, you've show to be hypocrite on a completely separate issue. It's okay for a dem to say they'll be transparent, and then not be so, but not Trump. It's okay to bitch about Trump alleging to usurp executive power, but you turn a blind eye when Obama DID SO.
Perhaps you should get your hypocrite tattoo re-touched? It's not to remind others that you're a hypocrite, it's to remind you.
Anybody hungry? There is plenty of word-salad above! Dig in!
shareRekt much? Was that short enough for your attention span to handle?
shareOh no!!!! I'm rekt now!!!!!!!! What will I ever do??? You are such a clown.
shareYou forgot the emojis!!!! I feel so unfulfilled!!!
shareI see that was within your attention span. Noted. In the mean time, why don't you figure out why you bother to reply to me in the first place! 😁😁😁
shareBoredom. I've got some money-making to do now though. Enjoy your echo chamber while I'm gone. Cheers!
shareAs Trey Gowdy would say, "See. That wasn't so tough."
Why give yourself such conundrums to figure out in the first place? 😁😁😁
I day trade so some days are literally spent in front of a computer following stocks. Leaves lots of time for posting BS on boards like this.
shareDid I ask what you did? Do you think I care? You're the one that left YOURSELF to ponder why you even bothered to reply to our posts. There was no need for your explain yourself to me or anybody else other than yourself.
Being that you found your answer was boredom, you come here and post for your own entertainment, don't ya?
You sound angry. That must be horrible.
shareWhy would I be angry, pray tell? I am your entertainment. That is why you're here.
shareYou are but a plaything. That is true. Why else would I hold a conversation with such a repulsive person?
shareHow should I know? You're not under duress.
Then again, let's see what your komrades think of you now on these boards. As I hold nothing against you from posting for your own amusement, all of the other dem regular posters are very sanctimonious here thinking there is a higher purpose in posting and these are "real convos".
I'm sure since they are all hypocrites, quite like yourself, they'll give you a pass 🤪🤪🤪
BuckSwope first burst onto this board with a trollish style and arrogance that indicated he thought of himself as really clever and creative, poised to dominate.
Lately he just seems depressed, trudging around like he realizes he sat in on a game that was over his head.
That's what hypocrisy staring back at him will do when Ignorance is chosen over the truth. He may have to visit sick bay and cry on a bench for a prescription of zoloft. Good thing Gen. Patton is no longer around or he'd get a slapping.
shareLet's get something straight. I'm not trolling you. The views I express are my beliefs. But, I would never bother with a person like you IRL. It just passes the time and amuses me when I'm at my computer.
shareI don't deny that you believe in what you say and I don't deny the boards are amusing. Nothing wrong in both. Now being there are idiotic and sanctimonious posters like dogdump and UV and Fredo, they don't take too kindly to people that reduce these boards as amusement. They're supposed to be reserved for "honest discussions". Whatever that means.
But as I said, they're hypocrites that share the same viewpoints as yourself, so they'll most probably give you a pass. As you probably know from personal experience, once you're a hypocrite, you can be hypocritical on everything else. 🤪🤪🤪
You should know.
And slander me all you want. The discussions I have had with you are on record and I stand by all of them.
As far as DD and UV or whoever else is my friend here, I'll take them over the likes of KRL any day of the week and twice on Sunday. That seems to be your only buddy here. I don't see you posting in the general about every day stuff where people can find common ground. I have found a few conservatives on here that I am friendly with here. You? You are hyper-partisan as is your buddy.
But I take it light. No weight on me. Like a feather floating in the breeze.
Yes, I would know as I've replied to both of them at length. So take my word for it. They're hypocrites just like you.
Good for you. Maybe you want to look them up on tinder to complete your matchmaking. I'm sure you'll have a wonderful threesome.
Of course I'm "hyper partisan" in your eyes. Spoken like a typical indoctrinated komrade. Common ground? We both believe that McCabe should be indicted. That's common ground, innit? We both believe in segregation of power. You just turn a blind eye when a dem usurps said power, yes?
Whenever I try to have a decent discussion with you I get back insults and innuendos.
Segregation of power is being pissed on right now. The Senate and the SCOTUS are being used as political weapons right now and there are no checks or balances on the executive branch. Of course you don't care because it's your "side" Just piss off. I'm done with you for today. Your buddy KRL is in permanent "I don't give a fuck and won't reply" land. You are close to being there. When and if I decide to put you in the corner with the rest of the kids like KRL you are going to miss me. Tread lightly.
Insults and innuendo? Puh-leeze. I gave you a chance to end your hypocrisy, but you let your ignorance get in the way. And then you just blew it off with some ad hominem insult. So spare me your sanctimonious victimhood. So pathetic.
Segregation is being pissed on and yet you turned a blind eye to Obama! How can you bitch about one thing and fail to acknowledge the truth? You bitch about partisanship and yet you're doing exactly that. Again, willful Ignorance to the truth.
LOL! Oh wow, you're undeservedly full of yourself. You're delusional enough to believe that your posting is so awesome and important to other people that you're literally warning him to "tread lightly" lest he be cut off from your replies? That's awesome.
Since you are just a stupid, hypocritical hack anyway, I prefer it this way. I still have fun kicking the crap out of you and correcting your misinformation, and it's clearer for new posters to see that without you polluting the exchange with a lot of noisy replies.
Your buddy KRL is in permanent "I don't give a fuck and won't reply" land.
They're supposed to be reserved for "honest discussions". Whatever that means.
No. Pray tell me what constitutes an "honest discussion" on these boards?
You do lie and you are willfully ignorant. Those are irrefutable facts not accusations. How can you call yourself honest when you're incapable of being honest with yourself??? You and Bucky are WILLFULLY IGNORANT, so how honest can you be, pray tell? 🤪🤪🤪
Ask your special ed teacher to define "honest discussion" for you. I'm not getting paid to teach you.
shareEven you don't know, because it's just a chepooka made up term from you and your komrades to fall back on when you paint yourselves in a corner.
You notice how you failed to refute being called a liar and a willful ignoramus??? Usually when people are called a liar, they fight tooth and nail with denial and yet, it's absent because it's true. 🤪🤪🤪
Releasing tax returns are not a requirement in any regard, all past Presidents have released their tax returns voluntarily you wing-nut.
If his taxes are still 'under audit' since 2016, then there's a serious problem with is taxes - a very serious problem for the IRS to keep digging deeper into it after four years. You want to take a stab at what the problem is ?
The fact is there is nothing saying a person cannot release tax returns even under audit.
shareExactly. But when one files no taxes, then one has nothing to release.
shareTrump knows his true wealth is no where near what he claims. And I'd bet my left nut his returns would prove he has personally profited from tax-payer money. We have a gangster in the Whitehouse. And not one of those cool ones. The ones from New Jersey in their Fila warm-up suits and gold chains that you can smell when they enter the room. When I see him on T.V. I can almost smell that "old man" smell. That mixture of body odor, cologne, and IcyHot.
shareThat's the best you got?
😄 You answered him with defeat alright. 😄
You literally replied to his point about your guy having a heart attack with some babbling nonsense about a "sharpie", I guess garbling a lame old "scandal of the week" DNC talking point that wouldn't matter even if it had been true.
You and your faceplanting comrade Buckswope stumbling around like a slapstick farce and getting owned never gets old.
Warren and Trump are in their 70s too -- all of them are too old to be president. It takes way too much energy.
shareTrump's in his early 70s, several years younger than the Democrats. Unlike them, he also seems to have boundless energy and to thrive in the role.
shareYes, but he also has extreme anger issues and many would say he is a heart attack waiting to happen.
shareNah, looks like he's loving life to me. Nothing like the perpetually sour-faced Democrats.
shareOh, I have no doubt that he loves his life. But also that he thinks himself invincible and brushes aside the warnings of doctors etc. I'm sure his diet isn't the healthiest, either.
shareIndividuals are different and respond to diets differently. The doctors say he's very healthy, and I have no reason to assume they're lying given the public evidence of his robust behavior.
shareHillary is a spring chicken! Only 72.
Watch all the candidates die mysteriously over the next 7 months. Hillary and Bill 2020!