Do any Democrats here oppose this treasonous coup attempt?

Yes Eric
Yr father has to go!

Good lord!!
Talk about brainwashed!
I grew up in NY and trumps been grifting his whole life!
The guys bad news

Obama holdover and partisan hack Eric Ciaramella is the placeholder for the "whistleblower". He, Zaid, Schiff, and some other Democrats apparently worked out this scheme ahead of time. But you're right, he's obviously not a real whistleblower and they did a poor job gaming this out. It's hilarious going back and seeing Schiff repeatedly talking about the importance of Congress eventually hearing the "whistleblower" testify, only to do a 180 once unsavory facts about him began leaking out and he realized how catastrophic it would be to have a nervous, sweating Ciaramella grilled about his long history of political interactions with Democrat leaders, including the orchestration of this latest farce. Then it all became about "protecting" the "whistleblower's" secrecy and from even having to testify, LOL, and to heck with democracy and transparency.

So you're fine with Democrats truly undermining the American working class by importing foreign third world populations to cement their own political power while suppressing wages, along with killing jobs through tax and regulatory policies (Exhibit A: hollowed out urban centers with no tax base after decades of one party Democrat control), and would rather have Obama somehow get to force through a liberal replacement for the deceased conservative icon Scalia in the middle of a presidential election campaign rather than let the people decide something so important in the vote (democracy). You couldn't care less about Obama "separat(ing)" "children" "from their guardians" (or that happening to every American who's arrested, and rightly so), but like a good little Maoist you feign outrage about Trump supposedly doing the same thing (to a far less, more tightly regulated extent) when instructed to by your masters.

Got it. In that case I'm not surprised that you're a treasonous coup supporter willing to shred the Constitution and trample democracy. I appreciate you partly answering the question, though you didn't answer the part about whether you've thought about future consequences or if you're not seeing beyond just myopically wanting to get rid of the "publican" president.

What gets me about that is that most of the people who will be affected by the food stamp revocation are, ironically, Trump supporters. Hell, every person I know who is on food stamps is a Trump supporter.

Statistically, red states are the highest draw in this area.

Classic case of imbeciles voting to hurt themselves.

Have you ever seen National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation? Trumpers always say: "he's just like us!". No, Trump isn't. Trump is like that boss in Christmas Vacation to the letter: can't remember his employee's names, doesn't give a rat's ass about the worker stiffs beneath him and cuts all their bonuses out without notice to save himself money. THAT is who Trump most closely relates to. It's absolutely headache-inducing how Trumpers can't see that.

Can’t help stupid.

"Stealing a Supreme Court nomination (McConnell/Gorsuch) "

Classic example of the Republican mentality at work.

When they are in power, they'll do anything they can get away with. We're just going to do a blanket rejection of anyone Obama nominates to the court for a full year because we can. We get to make the rules.

Meanwhile an investigation into a Republican's shady dealings that follows the constitution and the law to a T is called a coup, unconstitutional, treason!

There is no coup attempt.

No, it's completely sane, I'm very serious, and even the provocative title is based on a chief Democrat architect's own words.

It's called a "coup" because it's an attempt to oust the elected president under false pretenses for political reasons. The Constitution isn't foolproof. Stability depends on enough leaders doing the right thing rather than trying to game the system, in this case violating both the letter and spirit of the "impeachment" segment for a narrow, partisan, obsessive vendetta. As Turley laid out in his testimony, in public discussions the founding fathers warned about the dangers of factional impeachments and certainly opposed the notion that the House could or should impeach for any reason it wants. They adopted the language they did to try and restrict impeachment after seeing its abuses in British history, and even the Brits had more restrictions than the Democrats' current working theory of "the House gets to do whatever it wants".

But you may have missed the part of the op where I point out that about half the country views it as a treasonous coup attempt. Whether you do or not, that's a fact you have to deal with unless you ignore reality. Even if you believed you somehow had a technically sound case for impeachment does that necessarily mean you should impeach?

Have you thought through the potential consequences of forcing through impeachment on a purely partisan basis (likely against bipartisan opposition), when you're not able to bring half the country with you and if anything it's been looking like opposition to impeachment has increased since these hearings began, especially among moderates in battleground states?

I'm not just talking about the next election either, but the long term impact this precedent would have on the stability of the country.

Wrong. I quoted the fake whistleblower's lawyer, a Democratic activist who got a lot of support and encouragement with his "coup" boasts.

By contrast your post is a series of hysterical lies and actual conspiracy theory nonsense that's been debunked.

I'm on solid ground in rejecting your premises. By contrast you can't rationally dispute the premise that Democrats have openly wanted to impeach Trump since the beginning for whatever pretext they could gin up, the fact that this impeachment effort is purely partisan, or the fact that no crime has been proved.

Sadly half the political spectrum hates this country and is dedicated to destroying it.